- Apr 19, 2012
- 32,708
- 6,391
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
I may or may not agree with handing over the addresses of people who receive medicaid I lean towards no. As to records being confidential information to a certain extent it is and should be. On the other hand, if someone is reaching out for help with basic needs food, medicial care shelter ECT then whomever is providing that help whether it be the government, a charity or a private party should have some right to know what they are doing with the money ( what kind of care it is prviding and in the case of food they should in fact have some right to ensure that it is spend on basic, quality usually mid-range price wise food. If it is their own money it is their business how they spend it, but if they are claiming they need help then to a certain extent it becomes whomever's busiesss that is providing that help.If one read the article, they’d know that they could have limited their data pull to emergency Medicaid enrollees and states where the state governments allowed illegals to enroll. Instead they are wasting man-hours digging through the whole stack.
Also, according to that article, the immigrant enrollees should be in a separate database anyway because the states weren’t allowed to bill the federal government for those enrollees. Not that those states are overly cooperative.
Anything related to being broke is private and confidential information, because there’s still a stigma about being poor here in the U.S. Let’s just toss the full Medicaid database around where a hacker can get it and expose the personal data of the nation’s most vulnerable people. Smart.
Upvote
0