Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There are many different breeds but they are still horses.
"Dawn horse (genus Hyracotherium), extinct group of horses that flourished in North America and Europe during the early part of the Eocene Epoch (55.8–33.9 million years ago). Even though these animals are more commonly known as Eohippus, a name given by the American paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh, they are properly placed in the genus Hyracotherium, the name given earlier by British paleontologist Richard Owen."
So what did the Hyracotherium "evolve" from, what evidence that can be verified?
Well, to be fair, [Yockey] believed that "the origin of life is unsolvable as a scientific problem," doesn't sound all that scientific.Anyone care to bet that it will be claimed that he is not a "real scientist"?
Yes, it seems that both monogamy and polygamy both have costs and benefits and seems to be species dependent. Not sure why you're so excited about this? We've known this for decades.There are different views from people who have attended the same educational institutions and have the same big letters behind their name and, access to the same data. So why are they wrong and can you provide verifiable evidence proving your answer?
[Evolutionists have long taught and believed that promiscuity increases genetic and rapid diversity, thereby helping the evolution of new species along. But this “conventional wisdom” has now been overturned by a new study on shorebird populations, led by the University of Bath’s Milner Centre for Evolution.
Polygamy vs. Monogamy
This new study suggests that promiscuity does the opposite of what has long been believed. Instead of speeding up supposed evolutionary processes, it slows down the formation of new species. Polygamous bird species (species that breed with more than one partner during the season) have less genetic diversity compared to monogamous bird species populations (species that breed with just one partner per season).
Here’s why:
· Polygamous species have to travel farther to find their mates, so they spread their genes over a wide geographical area. This mixes up and dilutes the gene pool over a larger area so that populations are “less likely to diversify into new species over time.”
· Monogamous species generally come back to the same breeding sites, which allows them to gradually adapt to that specific environment. This increases the chance they will split off and form new species.]
New Study Overturns the “Conventional Wisdom” of Evolution
I take it back. By trying to move the goalposts past Hyracotherium tevans has not only effectively admitted that humans are apes, he has admitted that humans are primates.You are moving the goal post. By your standards you just admitted that humans are apes.
I wonder why cdesign proponentsists insist on muddying the waters with "information" nonsense. LolI wonder why the evolutionists want to argue about meanings of “evolution, transitional, speciation, adaptation, etc. and the changing of one breed of horse into another breed of horse but never want to start “in the beginning”.
Life from Nonlife
“Life comes from life” is a fundamental law of biology, and yet formation of the first living thing must violate this law. How this could happen still stumps scientists.
by Kevin Anderson
Information of Life
Life consists of more than all the physical parts working in unison—it requires the information to run the parts. Scientists still don’t understand where this information could have come from.
by Brian A. Catalucci
Irreducible Complexity
Darwinian evolution requires that every complex component of life arose step-by-step. The discoveries of genetics and cell biology have highlighted this impossibility, which scientists still can't explain.
by Nathaniel Jeanson
Your "logic" sadly does not work. By those standards the entire mass of the Earth should be bacteria.I try to stay away from Christian sites when in discussions with non-Christians but since I am inundated with information from sources that I do not agree with, at least not all of it, I see no reason why I should not present some information from sources that I do agree with...mostly.
[Creationists are often asked, “How is it possible for the earth’s population to reach 6.5 billion people if the world is only about 6,000 years old and if there were just two humans in the beginning?” Here is what a little bit of simple arithmetic shows us.
SIMPLE, CONSERVATIVE ARITHMETIC REVEALS CLEAR MATHEMATICAL LOGIC FOR A YOUNG AGE OF THE EARTH.
One Plus One Equals Billions
Let us start in the beginning with one male and one female. Now let us assume that they marry and have children and that their children marry and have children and so on. And let us assume that the population doubles every 150 years. Therefore, after 150 years there will be four people, after another 150 years there will be eight people, after another 150 years there will be sixteen people, and so on. It should be noted that this growth rate is actually very conservative. In reality, even with disease, famines, and natural disasters, the world population currently doubles every 40 years or so.1
After 32 doublings, which is only 4,800 years, the world population would have reached almost 8.6 billion. That’s 2 billion more than the current population of 6.5 billion people, which was recorded by the U.S. Census Bureau on March 1, 2006.2 This simple calculation shows that starting with Adam and Eve and assuming the conservative growth rate previously mentioned, the current population can be reached well within 6,000 years.]
Is this wrong and if it is, can you explain why and can you provide evidence proving that is wrong?
[The difference between life and matter is information
The information is located in the one-dimensional DNA-sequence of four letters A,T,C,G which is translated with the help of the genetic code to the one-dimensional sequence of 20 different amino acids in proteins [17]. This one-dimensional sequence of the protein determines the 3-D structure of proteins. The 3-D structure of proteins enables specific biochemical reactions to be speeded up. This sustains structures essential to life. In the end, information is the difference between life and matter, between biology and physics. Information is the ultimate explanation of life. Information is the secret of life [12]. This view of life is an oversimplification. Other scientists point out that life consists of 3 subsystems: a chemical motor, a double-layer membrane and an information storing system [13].
It is fortunate that information theory in mathematics and engineering exists. Yockey explains this theory in part I of his book and applies it in part II to problems in biology: protein complexity, the genetic code, the primeval soup theory, the origin of life, theories of aging, and molecular evolution.]
Information theory and molecular biology. (Hubert Yockey).
Seems to me to be a valid question.
[Some Real Scientists Reject Evolution
Do any scientists with Ph.D. degrees reject the theory of evolution? Yes, they do!
The Credential Attack
You may have noticed that evolutionists often attack the scientific credentials of any scientist who rejects the theory of evolution. They have to do this because:
1. There is so little scientific evidence that supports evolution.
2. What little evidence they have is highly questionable.
Since they can’t refute the scientific evidence, they try to refute the scientist.]
That is irrefutable, how many times does one see an attack on the source but never an effort to challenge the content? One needs to look no further than this thread to see it in black and white.
Nope, bad title. The theory of evolution is not being questioned there. What is being discussed is how life evolved, now whether it evolved or not. Evolution is a given in that article.I can agree with that.
[Evolution theory questioned
Skull of human ancestors suggests early man was single species
Georgian scientists on Friday presented a 1.8 million-year-old skull discovered in the Caucasus nation that researchers say could force a re-evaluation of current theories of human evolution...
The scientists behind the discovery claim the different lineages some experts have described in Africa -- such as Homo habilis and Homo Rudolf Ensis -- were all just ancient people of the species Homo erectus who looked different from each other.
They also suggest that early members of the modern man's genus Homo, first found in Africa, soon expanded into Asia despite their small brain size.]
Evolution theory questioned
Onboard sound.IF, one has a case, motherboard, memory, hard drive, power supply, video card, monitor, a CPU, a connected power source and it is all connected correctly, can any information be extracted from that system? If not, why?
What if it remained in that condition for four billion years, what, if anything, would evolve?
I don't know what came before Eohippus.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?