• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Macro Lense VS Macro Filter

flying_kiwifruit

used to be bellaandpjforever I had a name change</
Site Supporter
Mar 24, 2006
5,487
220
New Zealand
✟97,205.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Hey

I want to be able to do more macro work, I was talking to the guys at a photography shop and they said I have two options a filter for my camera or a lense which both would allow me to get clearer close up work.

Can anyone tell me which is better and the pro and cons of each thanks
 

MarkEvan

Senior Veteran
Jun 15, 2006
2,279
482
Manchester
✟34,842.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
First thing to say is that you have a interesting photo considering your faith icon.
Secondly, personally I would go with a lens rather than the filters (I think he is refering to extention tubes), mainly because the quality is better from the dedicated lenses. Unforutuantly they also cost most :p .


Mark
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,868
7,883
66
Massachusetts
✟409,609.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There are a number of ways of doing macrophotography. You have the choice of:

1) Dedicated macro lens. Macro lenses are optimized to have maximum sharpness and flatness of field (i.e. the plane of sharp focus is really a flat plane, rather than curved) at close distances, and probably gives you the best image quality. They also cost the most. Most macro lenses these days can give you 1x magnification (i.e. the image on the sensor will be the same size as the object), although some can only do 0.5x (or 1:2, as it is usually called).

If you are still using an Olympus E-system SLR, you have a somewhat limited selection of macro lenses. Olympus makes several. I don't know anything about these lenses, but Olympus generally makes excellent lenses, and almost all macro lenses are good these days, so I suspect they are quite good. There are also two or three Sigma macros in the four-thirds mount; these lenses in other mounts have an excellent reputation.

Note that, if you choose a macro lens, the big choice will be the focal length. Since they all generally yield the same magnification, the choice won't affect the image size you get. What a longer focal length buys you is greater working distance, that is, distance between the front of the lens and the object -- at the cost of greater size and cost.

2) Supplementary lens. Mounted like a filter, these are often (incorrectly) called "diopters". Cheap ones can give poor results, but the good ones (with two lens elements) can be very good. Probably not quite as good as a dedicated macro lens, but close, and a lot cheaper; typically they don't give you as much magnification, but I don't recall the details. They are also a lot lighter and easier to bring along than a macro lens. Since they mount on the filter threads, they are interchangeable between brands -- you just have to get the right size to fit your filter threads (possibly with a step-up or step-down ring). The standard high-quality choice is the Canon D series (e.g. the 500D).

3) Extension tubes. These are tubes with no optical elements that go between the lens and the camera. They increase the image magnification at the cost of loss of light; the magnification is larger for wider-angle lenses. You can get different sizes for different magnifications. Image quality can be quite good, although I think it depends on the lens you're using. They are kind of inflexible, though, and a bit of a pain to use, but a lot cheaper than a macro lens. They can also be used with macro lenses for greater magnification.

4) Bellows. Bellows are like extension tubes, but continuously variable. I don't know if there are any available for the four-thirds mount.

5) Lens reversing ring. This permits you to mount your lens backwards on your camera. With some lenses this can give very good images, with high magnification, but it may not work well with all lenses. It's kind of an odd solution, and not something you see very often.

6) Coupling rings. These let you mount one lens backwards in front of another lens. A smaller focal length mounted on a larger one gives you magnification. Again, this works best for some lens combinations.

As the photo store person said, options (1) and (2) are the most common, and easiest, ways to proceed.
 
Upvote 0