Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, if the number represent His will, anyone can. Go ahead, pick 5 pre split stars, give them all wildly different speeds. Make an equation.
OK!
onion * garden rake[sup]2[/sup]/orange = 1/8 harbor[sub]seal[/sub]
Well, if the number represent His will, anyone can. Go ahead, pick 5 pre split stars, give them all wildly different speeds. Make an equation.
Star O, star Y, star B, star Z, and star P. Compared to present light speed (C), then, we have, on fine former state day...
C[sup]22[/sup] = B C[sup]107[/sup]=O C [sup]1002[/sup]= Y C[sup]8001[/sup]= Z C[sup]10,012[/sup]=P
W (God's will)
__--- So [B,Z,O,P,Y] times Former light speed = W
If you crunched the numbers, you would see that they do not add up to the speed of the same star's light in this state.
So, all the jokes people make about you aren't really jokes -- you really are making this stuff up as you go along?
Gee, how funny, given that you set things up to give you those results.
I ask some questions. Test the limits of our knowledge. The bible points out that, even now, stars differ in glory.
1Co 15:41 -There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. It also reminds us in this same chapter of the heavenly nature, versus this nature!
Very good. Some are naughty, some are nice. Some are fast, some are slow.I guess stars are like people -- some are bright; some are dim.
Very good. Some are naughty, some are nice. Some are fast, some are slow.
Could you be under achieving, in the content dept?Is it possible you're overpersonifying?
Could you be under achieving, in the content dept?
Don't be Poe. Talk to us about topical things, things that relate to the OP. Things about clouds rising up like a genie from a lamp, and forming the moon. Things like the fables science resorts to to explain the lunar water. Things like how we know distant star light is coming at us at the light speed we see in out solar system...etc.Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
Don't be Poe. Talk to us about topical things, things that relate to the OP. Things about clouds rising up like a genie from a lamp, and forming the moon. Things like the fables science resorts to to explain the lunar water. Things like how we know distant star light is coming at us at the light speed we see in out solar system...etc.
One cannot be defeated by silly strawmen questions, that are insane, and off topic.Can't answer my question, can you?
Can't commit your own unforgivable sin of admitting fallibility?
Consider yourself defeated, dad.
What defeats one, is a failure to address the real issues actually being discussed in a meaningful way.
I am not here to play games.
Some with problems of perception might think too much is made of what they miss.You don't consider the possibily of reading too much into something to be meaningful?
Some with problems of perception might think too much is made of what they miss.
I think this is enough diversion for me, address the topics.
Couldn't agree more.
Already did -- I already said that the most plausible explanation for the presence of ice is a comet impact.
Hardly a stretch, since the Moon's covered with impact craters.
...
So, in other words, you don't know where the meteor or comet came from. OK.
The OP link listed earth as a source of the material that impacted the moon, and left water. Both science and the bible seem to be in agreement to some extent here.
The article even mentions wind. Solar wind. In todays news, they link the sunspots with magnetic fields.
We also know that there were a lot of magnetic reversals and activity on earth, and it is related to the time of the separation of continents. (i.e. the sea floor, etc)
Again, a link with science and the bible.
Space, yes, the theories from science admit that much, but have earth as the source first.I don't think it would be too much of a leap to say "outer space."
No, I saw them, but they are foolish. At least with earth, they have a nearby actual known source.Actually, dad, the OP link listed Earth as one of four possible sources. Did you not notice the other three, or did you choose to ignore them?
Right, .....and..?? Point? If they are right about that wind hitting earth, and taking water, one imagines that it could also produce wind in our atmosphere, at least near where it was focused. Obviously in space, it would not be wind as we think of it.Because solar wind is the term for charged particles ejected from the sun.
"Extending those measurements to the oceans, around 1960, revealed a surprising difference. In the ocean floor the magnetization was orderly, arranged in long strips. The strips on the Atlantic ocean floor, in particular, all seemed parallel to the "mid-Atlantic ridge." That is a volcanic ridge running roughly north-to-south (with some zigs and zags), halfway between Europe-Africa and America. It is marked by the focus-points of earthquakes and by some volcanic islands, and more recently it was explored by research submarines, which have at times observed lava oozing out at its crest."Actually, it's a link you just fabricated -- you've never been able to connect the magnetic reversals with the time of the separation of continents.
Seafloor Spreading InteractiveCome to think of it, you've never been able to connect anything with the time of the separation of continents.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?