• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Logical Problems with Calvinism

Status
Not open for further replies.

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Why can't a fully sovereign God grant freedom to His creatures? How does sovereignty prevent Him from doing that?

I believe it is a fallacious idea to claim that man's freedom limits or reduces God's sovereignty. There is no basis for such a claim.
 
Reactions: Job8
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Nonsense. It is not a zero sum game.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,885.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Then, with all respect, I do not consider you within the realm of the orthodoxy. Thus, any conversation we have will be fruitless because we are not on the same page with the most fundamental, basic aspects of God.
Are you open to a discussion about the Biblical case against "full" omniscience?
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,885.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Hi expos4ever, have you ever seen the movie, Mouse Hunt? If you want to see what could happen to the universe if even a single "maverick molecule" existed in it outside of God's purview, watch that movie
I appreciate the suggestion, but I prefer to get my theology from a careful, open-minded examinations of the Scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,885.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Nonsense. It is not a zero sum game.
Please actually defend your position. How, and please be precise and make an actual argument, is anything I have posted "nonsense" from a specifically Biblical perspective?
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,135
45,788
68
✟3,104,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Are you open to a discussion about the Biblical case against "full" omniscience?

I thought Rice's and Pinnock's "Open Theism" had been given a fair hearing by many/most denominations and seminaries over 10 years ago and was declared to be a heresy by all of them IOW, according to the churches and seminaries (like TEDS), there is no Biblical case for anything short of "full" omniscience ..
 
Upvote 0

Jesus First

Lover of Jesus Christ
Aug 24, 2015
204
26
Visit site
✟16,384.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God doesn't play dice. That would make the dice God, you see.

Dear Calvinist, brother,

We have different views of God. I believe free will choices don't limit His sovereignty. How is this possible? By believing that God’s greatness is greater than our human minds can fully understand.

One’s view of God is not inconsequential. Did God create Adam and Eve to sin, or did God make them with the capacity to resist (free will)?

In Christ!
 
Reactions: FreeGrace2
Upvote 0

Jesus First

Lover of Jesus Christ
Aug 24, 2015
204
26
Visit site
✟16,384.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dear Calvinist Brother,

Are you not limiting God’s greatness down to a human level of understandability for validation? God’s sovereignty is greater than the limits imposed by a model using human philosophy.

In Christ!
 
Upvote 0

Jesus First

Lover of Jesus Christ
Aug 24, 2015
204
26
Visit site
✟16,384.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Dear Calvinist Brother,

I respectfully object to your statement that “Christ taught man's will is not free” (your partial quote) from John 8:31-36 & Romans 6:22-23. Your claim is not substantiated by the context. You are absolutely correct, however, that all men are slaves to sin. But you are confusing apples with oranges. The point of Christ’s teaching was not that man doesn't posses a free will but that man is a slave to sin and can be made free from sin. Once saved, sin’s right to rule in one’s life has been broken.

Mankind’s slavery to sin doesn’t nullify free will choices. It means that choices are limited by man’s fallen state.

Before the fall in the Garden, man’s ability to chose wasn't limited by sin. The choices available to Adam in his pre-fallen state were within the limits imposed by God during creation. Man's ability to make limited choices before and after the fall didn't/don't threaten God sovereignty unless one’s view of God greatness is reduced to a human level of comprehension where God must preordain every detail to remain sovereign.

You surely don't understand fully the doctrine of the Trinity. Yet, (I assume), your belief in the Trinity is not limited to your minds ability to fully grasp the magnitude of a Triune God. Since you surely apply faith to understand aspects of the Trinity that are outside our mind’s capacity, should not this practice be applied to God?

In Christ!
 
Upvote 0

Isaiah55:6

Active Member
Nov 20, 2015
275
86
43
✟23,416.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
2 Thesa2:13 But we should always give thanks to God for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God has chosen you from the beginning for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and faith in the truth.

Can you tell me what this verse means please? If it doesn't mean ' God chose you from the beginning for salvation'.
 
Upvote 0

Jesus First

Lover of Jesus Christ
Aug 24, 2015
204
26
Visit site
✟16,384.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Dear Calvinist Brother,

In my opinion, your view of God is limited by the mental framework you attach to His greatness. Since He must preordain everything in advance to remain sovereign, any challenge to your view of God and man’s ability to make choices becomes a limitation on God’s sovereignty (if true) or a misunderstanding of free will.

We can agree to disagree

Why is it that most Believers are perfectly fine with God having pre-eminence in all things, EXCEPT for Salvation? Why does man feel that he must stick his nose into it and try to claim a piece of it as his own doing?

You have created a straw man (I say this respecfully) and knocked it down.


In Christ!
 
Upvote 0

Jesus First

Lover of Jesus Christ
Aug 24, 2015
204
26
Visit site
✟16,384.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Dear brother,

This means what it says. "God has chosen" us "from the beginning". Are you in agreement with Romans 8:29 where foreknowledge comes before predestination?

In Christ!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,135
45,788
68
✟3,104,417.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Dear brother,

This means what it says. "God has chosen" us "from the beginning". Are you in agreement with Romans 8:29 where foreknowledge comes before predestination?

In Christ!

Hi JF, if προγινώσκω [proginosko], "foreknew" could be clearly shown to support the "prescient" view of Arminianism (IOW, God making His choice of us based upon our choice of Him), this would go a LONG way to support your view. How does the Bible put it, "God loved us because we first loved Him", right? Wait, that's not it, is it

Unfortunately, the scholars are divided, and sometimes not even along (or completely along) "party" lines. Vincent's Word Study, for instance, says it is definitely Arminian "prescience" that is in view, while Robertson, on the other hand, clearly shows why it is not

Perhaps we should take some time to study 'both' sides and honestly report what we find concerning προγινώσκω in Romans 8:29? Chances are we will end up, as you put it above, simply agreeing to disagree, but the effort may still be worthwhile

Yours and His,
David
 
Upvote 0

Job8

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2014
4,639
1,801
✟29,083.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
That verse means exactly what it says PROVIDED YOU READ IT THROUGH TO THE END without any preconceived ideas. Salvation means the ultimate perfection of the saints -- body, soul, and spirit. And it is through sanctification by the power of the Holy Spirit that the believer is changed into the likeness of Christ. God has predestinated each one who believes to be perfected in Christ -- CONFORMED TO THE IMAGE OF HIS SON (Rom 8:29). So that is exactly what God has chosen us to be from the beginning -- elect according to the foreknowledge of God "through sanctification of the Spirit" (1 Pet 1:2). As you can see both verses correspond. "Chosen", "predestinated", and "elected" are all the same. And the purpose is always the perfection of the saints (1 Jn 3:1-3).
 
Reactions: FreeGrace2
Upvote 0

sdowney717

Newbie
Apr 20, 2013
8,712
2,022
✟117,598.00
Faith
Christian
Man can not make himself free, he is a slave of sin. Only Christ can set you free.
Man has a free will within a boundary of his own natural condition, and that means to chose to continue to sin, heaping sins upon sins, which men do, but he can not chose to do good of his own free will. Good would be to chose Christ and seek after God.
Man can not choose to seek God, unless God regenerates man, man wont be seeking God and can not know spiritual things that are of the truth, but can know spiritual things of darkness being evil. Natural man is evil.

God here would be Jesus Christ and no one seeks after Christ, all seek their own.
20 For I have no one like-minded, who will sincerely care for your state. 21 For all seek their own, not the things which are of Christ Jesus.

Good here is only what God considers good, not what fallen man considers good.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
You said this:
"Well, you are probably not going to like this, but I do indeed believe that God is neither fully omnipotent nor fully omniscient. So I can then claim that man can have free will without creating a contradiction. No doubt, you believe that the omniscience and omnipotence of God is Biblical; I disagree and politely suggest it is an idea that leaks in from the "caricature" of the Christian God that floats around in the air of our culture and which many take onboard as if by osmosis.

We agree on one thing, at least: If man has any freewill, this takes away from the "sovereignty" of God."

I responded with:
nonsense. It's not a zero sum game.

And your reply:
Please actually defend your position.
Actually, it's you who said this first:
"While I suspect you and I are on the same side of this issue, I think the point is that to the extent man has free will, this necessarily reduces the sovereignty of God. Thus, I think your opponent in debate would say, God cannot remain fully sovereign if man has any degree of free will whatsoever."

The burden of proof is on you to defend your claim about God's sovereignty. I have challenged that view. So, ball's in your court.

How, and please be precise and make an actual argument, is anything I have posted "nonsense" from a specifically Biblical perspective?
Go ahead and serve the ball. Then we'll see if you can handle the return.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The question really is this: On what basis did He choose you for salvation? And the answer is found in that verse: through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.

Salvation is ALWAYS based on believing what God says about His Son and His promise of eternal life for believers.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.