• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Life on Mars????

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chi_Cygni

Well-Known Member
Nov 10, 2003
954
25
From parts unknown
✟1,221.00
Faith
Anglican
AlaskanDan said:
Once again, before i go to bed, i must add...evolution is a theory, you stated it yourself, such a theory should not be used in science until it is proven. Science is not factual until proven unfactual, it is unfactual until proven factual. Evolution is a creative theory, but it is yet a theory. Goodnight fellow believer in the risen Lord Jesus Christ? The only way to eternal life is through Him, If you do not believe Jesus Christ is your only way to Heaven, i recomend you reevaluate your life and accept the Lord as your personal savior. I know where I am going after I die...do you?


Creationist mistake #1. Do they actually teach these errors you guys make in some online class or something. This must the billionth misuse of the word 'theory' and the word 'proven' in a scientific context. Learn what science is so you don't make this mistake.
 
Upvote 0

notto

Legend
May 31, 2002
11,130
664
55
Visit site
✟29,869.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
rkonfire said:
Notto, if you think any type of dating explains millions of years old, you are mistaken. "The dating methods can be corrected and adjusted in accordance with dating and ratios of samples of known age (and this is currently done)."
Known age? So in other words, if calculations don't agree with "known ages", then they're thrown out? But if you don't have a "known age" yet for something, then the calculations are kept? Yet these calculations always match up with each other? You can't just keep want you want and throw away what you don't want. If these dating methods ALWAYS worked, then they would go RIGHT ALONG HAND with your so called "known ages." Also, how're "known ages" proven?
I was speaking specifically of c-14 dating which can be compared to things of known ages such as trees, ancient artifacts, volcanic eruptions, and is determined to be fairly accurate and its limitations are well know.

I didn't say anything is thrown out. The curves and tables that are used in c-14 dating are constructed by measuring the samples of known ages.

You misunderstood my post and the methods I discussed on how the c-14 dating is calibrated are valid and accepted. You need to understand how this dating works before you attempt to try to overthrow it. You have not shown that you understand the methods and your post only validates that.
 
Upvote 0

Rabidone

Member
Apr 22, 2004
63
1
✟188.00
Faith
Christian
Noone has mentioned idea of life on Mars having origionated on the earth.

Martian rocks are found on the earth, it is expected that rocks from the earth exist on Mars. Life is found deep within rocks on the Earth. There is a posibility life was propagated from Earth to Mars by being blasted off the earth via a meteor strike.

Don't be surprised if life is found on Mars or if it's found to be simillar to life on earth.
 
Upvote 0
D

Drotar

Guest
pgp_protector said:
It is now accepted that there IS Now Life on Mars



The thing is



We brought it there, they say the probes we sent may not of all been steralized, and there is now some cross comination going on.
They probably weren't sterilized. In fact, they weren't. They were exposed to open air at some point so life did arrive at Mars.

That life is dead now- it's too cold, there's no water, no food, and it can't breathe in a foreign atmosphere (they're specialized to our environment after 3.5 billion years of fine-tuning). Life doesn't exist on Mars anymore (if the microorganisms were capable of surviving to that point). It might have at one point though. :)
 
Upvote 0
D

Drotar

Guest
The planetismal collision which created our moon would have been capable of such. However, that was 4.25 billion years ago, according to Encyclopedia Brittanica 2004 if I remember correctly. Even if the microorganisms did get blasted off, I don't see how they would be capable of traveling months through space after such a blast. It is said that the heavy bombardment era sterilized the earth. Would not such a blast that projected rocks into space have a similar effect.

What would the rocks have landed in? The inner earth is quite different from ice on the surface of Mars. Doubt they'd have survived.

The most important fact to remember though is that life probably synthesized through abiogenesis AFTER the heavy bombardment of meteors. So such mechanisms to deliver a safe trip to Mars would be lesser in number.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.