- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,931
- 52,600
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, they aren't the same depth.The human footprint is the same depth as the dinosaur footprint.
There are numerous problems with the fossil claim, as documented here: http://paleo.cc/paluxy/delk.htm .
Erosion couldn't handle that?The foot prints did not disturb any micro lensing.
GM Crops are banned in 38 countries. Why do you suppose people do not believe that these mutated foods are good for them?
Dude, I've seen a lot of the evidence first-hand; when multiple independent lines of evidence, across many domains of knowledge, tell the same story, a reasonable person should take them seriously.
But strangely there was no designer for the designer, perhaps the designer wasn't complicated enough to need a designer.
The CT scan was made in a medical center by medical people, who had no expertise in studying fossils, who made no lab report of what they found. Their claims of compression of the layers by the footprints has been shown to be false.
Step barefoot into some mud...look at the prints. You'll instantly see that your evo-minded boys really don't know what the heck they're talking about.
I know that actually thinking about things before posting is not a favorite past time of yours, but instead of doing some insipid home experiment, why don't you answer a simple question - Baugh claims the dinosaur footprint is an Acrocanthosaurus which were 11 ft. long and weighed 6 tons. The human footprint is the same depth as the dinosaur footprint. So, which is it, the human weighed 6 tons or and 11 ft. long dinosaur weighed 140 lbs.?
Or perhaps the dino didn't weigh what you claimed....OR, perhaps the mud wasn't as soft and the dino didn't sink in as far.
You need to learn to think out of your textbook box. Realize reality.
LOL! There have been no attempts, only suspicions. Baugh keeps it too close for anything else.The problem for you is this....so far every attempt to prove the fossil to be a fraud has been dismantled.
The problem for you is this....so far every attempt to prove the fossil to be a fraud has been dismantled.
So, do tell us just what it is.
Post 3 said the motor protein is complex. We all agree it is complex. But you have furnished nothing to prove it is so complex that nature`s god could not have evolved it.post 3. You asked the question in post 1 and post 3 answered it.
Or maybe it had wings and could fly. Maybe was a ninja and was light on it's feet. Or, maybe, it was the size and weight that the skeletons suggest and therefore the "print" is problematic because you either have a 6 ton human or a 150 lb. dinosaur.
And you need to learn that ad hoc rationalizations are logically fallacious and not an actual explanation.
Or perhaps the dino didn't weigh what you claimed....
OR, perhaps the mud wasn't as soft and the dino didn't sink in as far.
You need to learn to think out of your textbook box. Realize reality.
It's a fraud. Just like everything Mr. Carl Baugh has in his museum. Especially himself.
Oh, my bad. I apologize....I forgot your statement was the only way the fossils could have been made. Forgive me for questioning you.
But, it was soft enough for the human to sink??
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?