- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,334
- 52,694
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Did you go to Sunday school, Merle?So components of the soil just popped up out of the ground and started forming a zebra? And since soil is low in carbon and oxygen, but the zebra is mostly carbon and oxygen, did air molecules rush in and work into position? And millions of times the necessary atoms rushed together to form the proteins and other molecules of the first zebra? And then--clear!--the heartbeat is started and the zebra jumps up and starts running about?
That must have been a sight to see! I would have loved to sit there and watch it.
I didn't say that, did I?Uh no, it is not true that every Christian agrees that life came about in the way that you interpret Genesis.
Many, many Christians think it came about by evolution.
Scientist have show they are not in the same place....all you are doing is...cut and paste.
Scientist have show they are not in the same place....all you are doing is...cut and paste.
The ATP connected to the Kinesin!
Ya ... I'm familiar with the rhetoric.As time progressed there was one line that looked more and more like reptiles, and a line off that looking more and more like mammals, and a line off that looking more and more like a zebra.
Ya ... I'm familiar with the rhetoric.
That's why I say evolution is nothing more than a game of connect-the-dots.
My snowman challenge thread shows how two things can be made of the exact same material ... not just one looking more like the other ... but from exactly the same material, yet one not being related to the other at all.
In other words, it shows a common designer, not a common ancestor.
And zebras popping into existence, fully formed, with all the motor proteins and everything in place is possible? Why exactly is it that you think your preferred process for making the first zebra is possible, and mine is not?
And no, saying God did it is not the answer. A God who could create a zebra out of nothing could create a zebra through evolution. If you think God created the first zebra out of nothing instead of through evolution, then one would think you would have a reason for saying your view has more scientific credibility than mine. Strangely, after 640 posts, you have not made the slightest effort to explain why zebras popping into existence fully formed is a more scientifically valid explanation of the first motor proteins of the first zebra, as opposed to evolution.
Wrong. I have repeatedly referred to a link with 29 major reasons for believing in macro evolution. You have simply ignored that link, and pretended I didn't mention it. Would you like me to provide the link again for your benefit?
And why not then?And no, saying God did it is not the answer.
Sigh..A God who could create a zebra out of nothing could create a zebra through evolution.
No, even on paper it doesn't account for what we observe in real life.It works on paper though, and that's good enough for them.
Oh really?
Well, if what you are claiming is true and you haven't dishonestly made it up, you should be able to quote those 'scientists' in giving their findings that the retroviral insertions are not identically located.
Off you go.....,
Okay provide evidence for this, and show it's not just genetic drift and such.
It is amazing that there are people that are brilliant with books but they can not even tie their shoe. They use to make comedy movies about absent minded professors that live their life in a world of books and could not function in the real world with the rest of us.It works on paper though, and that's good enough for them.
Atheistic model? Millions of Christians accept evolution as being a fact simply because it is.Sigh..
There is no God in evolution, it's a naturalistic / atheistic model.
But you think a God can? saying a God did it explains what? less than nothing.A model that can not even explain what we observe in reality.
Wait a min. I just had a talk with my son about this. I was looking at his Calculus book and it looks a lot like the Physics that I learned in college. So they had to explain to me what Newton was doing and just what the association is between Calculus and Physics. Just like people today are trying to explain the association between Darwin's Theory of Evolution and Creationism.
Yes, atheistic model.Atheistic model? Millions of Christians accept evolution as being a fact simply because it is.
How many times do i have to remind you that God is absent in the ToE ???Where did you study metaphysics??? The hand of God is in everything.
How many times do I have to remind you that the ToE simply does not address the metaphysical question of divine providence? No scientific theory does.How many times do i have to remind you that God is absent in the ToE ???
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?