Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,243
- 7,490
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You know why.
Plate tectonics can take a hike.Catastrophism involves accelerated plate tectonics. That is absolutely ridiculous.
The red sea was never parted. It was the sea of reeds.One of my favorite comics:
I always think of the parting of the Red Sea when I look at this.
Pharaoh and his army drowned in the Sea of Reeds, did they?The red sea was never parted. It was the sea of reeds.
Creation science can take a hike.So you've gone over to the creation science side now?
Yam Suph is "Sea of Reeds", (suph by itself means 'reed', e.g. in Exodus 2:3). This was pointed out as early as the 11th century, by Rashi. (Wiki)Pharaoh and his army drowned in the Sea of Reeds, did they?
Catastrophism is creation science.Creation science can take a hike.
I get it, me too. I like to remind evolutionists that, from listening to some of their nonsense, I understand it's perfectly reasonable to believe that they not only evolved from a monkey, but beyond the upright position, they haven't evolved much further. However, the reality is, that's just not an excuse for their lack of common sense because it simply didn't happen that way.
Seriously, I wouldn't waste any more time feeding the trolls. I counted at least 15 different alerts from the same individual under my alert tab in under 24 hours, at which point I just ignored them. The fact that some of these atheists come to a Christian forum, obsessively argue their non-Christian point, and obviously have no regard for the Bible, should be a clear enough indicator of a troll. Let's not continue to feed them.
Ah, in addition to science you don't understand what the phrase Internet troll means.Seriously, I wouldn't waste any more time feeding the trolls. I counted at least 15 different alerts from the same individual under my alert tab in under 24 hours, at which point I just ignored them. The fact that some of these atheists come to a Christian forum, obsessively argue their non-Christian point, and obviously have no regard for the Bible, should be a clear enough indicator of a troll. Let's not continue to feed them.
Pharaoh and his army drowned in the Sea of Reeds, did they?Yam Suph is "Sea of Reeds", (suph by itself means 'reed', e.g. in Exodus 2:3). This was pointed out as early as the 11th century, by Rashi. (Wiki)
Perhaps you could show me in that link where it is.
Multiply by God/God?You didn't answer my question: how do we factor God in to an equation?
Yam Suph is "Sea of Reeds", (suph by itself means 'reed', e.g. in Exodus 2:3). This was pointed out as early as the 11th century, by Rashi. (Wiki)
Okay, so if you had 400 generations of ancestors, . . . Let's just take the low frequency mutations, since they couldn't have been present in Adam and Eve, and ignore the really rare ones, since they could have occurred after the population got large. Let's say those that are between 1% and 10% in the modern population. You're carrying roughly half a million genetic variants in that frequency range. Now remember, these had to occur while the population was still really small -- less than a few hundred, and that certainly wasn't true at any time in recorded history, say for the last 4500 years (180 generations). That leave 220 generations, meaning your ancestors were accumulating ~2000 mutations per generation. That's about 40 times higher than the actual human mutation rate, and would undoubtedly be lethal. So no, that doesn't seem very likely. (In reality, the bulk of higher frequency variants would also have to be the result of mutations, meaning the actual mutation would have to have been more like 5000 mutations per generation. And how did the population jump from a few hundred to tens of millions overnight, anyway?)
There's a reason professional creationists avoid ever actually explaining any genetic data.
The would depend upon the accuracy inwhich you base your mutation rate upon.
Where did you develope your mutation rate from?
Seriously, I wouldn't waste any more time feeding the trolls. I counted at least 15 different alerts from the same individual under my alert tab in under 24 hours, at which point I just ignored them. The fact that some of these atheists come to a Christian forum, obsessively argue their non-Christian point, and obviously have no regard for the Bible, should be a clear enough indicator of a troll. Let's not continue to feed them.
The purpose was to remind readers that you have a track record of refusing to address evidence and admitting that you don't understand said evidence, it seems your participation in these threads is purely to derail and obfuscate. That quote was from a thread specifically created to provide you with evidence which you consequently hand waved away or ignored, preferring instead to fall back on your vacuous rhetoric. If you want evidence for evolution please go back to that thread.
Yet the truth of the matter was, I waved my hand because as I saw it, the evidence fell apart at the onset, or no one could/would explain how what little was brought forth was evidence at all...no more to it.
Also, on more than one occasion I've asked evidence be brought to the table for examination, offered to address it as I did the prior, and was met with mostly excuses and few takers. And I do get why that is, but don't just lie about it and try to trow it back on me, I did what I could to offer you all the opportunity.
So what you are saying there is far from the actual truth...but no surprise...more desperate attempts from the losing end.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?