Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Paul Bunyan is, in my opinion, either a fallen angel, or a Nephilim.It's not an answer -- it's a specific, legitimate question. Answer my question and I'll answer yours.
1 Timothy 2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.Eve.
GEn 3:20 And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was the mother of all living.
Did he marry his mother?
So is the trash in garbage dumps.
Dogs are not evolving. Do you even understand the definition of evolving? Maybe dogs will "evolve" and lose their legs like snakes did, too. I suppose you also believe Genesis was being symbolic where it says God created them as man and woman and that it could have meant they were less intelligent poo-slinging apes that evolved into humans.
Your lack of evidence is very telling.
Why would you think Paul Bunyan was a fallen angel? If he ever existed at all, which is doubtful, he was just a logger. The stories about him being a giant were later inventions.Paul Bunyan is, in my opinion, either a fallen angel, or a Nephilim.
He has no mother.
He was created ex nihilo.
No ... that's why I don't believe in evolution.Do you believe every story you hear?
IF the stories about Adam are true, then he didn't have a mother.No ... that's why I don't believe in evolution.
But IF the stories about Paul Bunyan are true though, then he was either a fallen angel (created ex nihilo), or a Nephilim (created ex material).
Your turn to answer my question please.
Who was Adam's mother?
I see you haven't changed since our last 'debate'.....
I'm not going to waste my time with going back and forth with you, you revel in your refusal to learn about the facts of biology whilst proclaiming how wrong they are. You might not see anything wrong with this but I'm sure everyone else can.
If you've actually got a specific scientific argument against evolution please go ahead, otherwise we can assume that you're talking out of your hat and ignore your inflammatory rhetoric.
What kind of answer is that?
I'm asking you a specific, legitimate question.
Who (or what) was Adam's mother?
IF the stories about Adam are true, then he didn't have a mother.
I just like to pop by every now and then to remind you guys that the type of nonsense creationism that you spout is taken as seriously as the existence of leprechauns by scientists.
The authors of the NT also present them as types. The authors of the NT sometimes treat OT narratives as allegories. They sometimes completely change the meaning of OT passages. They do a lot of things, not all of which are things we would consider ideal ways of reading.The authors of the NT present them as true.
The authors of the NT also present them as types. The authors of the NT sometimes treat OT narratives as allegories. They sometimes completely change the meaning of OT passages. They do a lot of things, not all of which are things we would consider ideal ways of reading.
Go read my response again: I said they "also" presented A&E as types. That means that I was agreeing that they presented them as historical. (Though I'm not sure you should be citing Jude here, since he's quoting a non-Biblical book. It's almost as if he doesn't know what's in the Bible and what isn't.)Jude 1:4 It was also about these that Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying, “Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of his holy ones,
ADAM PRESENTED AS LITERAL.
I get it, me too. I like to remind evolutionists that, from listening to some of their nonsense, I understand it's perfectly reasonable to believe that they not only evolved from a monkey, but beyond the upright position, they haven't evolved much further. However, the reality is, that's just not an excuse for the lack of common sense because it simply didn't happen that way.
Then it should be right at home when we go to a one-world government, shouldn't it?The study of evolution has and continues to be a scientific discipline worldwide.
The difference is, your words mean nothing beyond this forum.
Go read my response again: I said they "also" presented A&E as types. That means that I was agreeing that they presented them as historical. (Though I'm not sure you should be citing Jude here, since he's quoting a non-Biblical book. It's almost as if he doesn't know what's in the Bible and what isn't.)
Anyhow, could we get back on topic? When did the millions of mutations you carry occur among your ancestors? How many occurred per generation?
Difference from what? You seem to have squeezed out half a thought there. You replied to a post about monkeys, how does that comment fit with what you replied to?
Maybe you should stick with the "popping in and reminding", and leave it at that.
Then it should be right at home when we go to a one-world government, shouldn't it?
Still not answering the questions. How many mutations had to occur in each generation of your ancestors? How many generations has it been since Adam, roughly speaking?They occurred from Cain to the present.
As I told you before, I've already answered this question twice, giving you a specific answer, my reasoning and (in one of the threads) references. There's a nice search function here if you want to read my answers again.Now, answer my question...what % of your 1% mutations are beneficial? Ballpark answer is fine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?