• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Let's Talk About Hell (6)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Nice story.
Thanks :wave:
I intended it as a parable. The Just Law represents the True God of the bible. The Evil King represents the false god pictured by eternal torment preachers. The dungeon represents their false hell of eternal torture. The torture represents the torture that the false preachers say await everyone else. The man represents mankind, who sinned and was redeemed. In the story he had to redeem himself. Perhaps I should have put an external redeemer in the story to represent Jesus.

I'm sorry if the meaning of the story as a parable was not clear enough. I'm not a very good story teller. Perhaps the story was a little too subtle.
 
Upvote 0

Soulgazer

Christian Gnostic
Feb 24, 2011
3,748
90
Visit site
✟26,903.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Except Justice is a two edge sword. If the same Judgement for this life can reconcile people to God into bliss, then it cannot follow that the opposite reconciliation is only Just if it does not last as long as the bliss does. It is A or B and both equal Just (and Love and Mercy for that matter). If one fate is eternal and that be a Just reconciliation for this life, then making the opposite fate eternal could not possibly be unjust, or unloving or unmerciful.
This isn't math class.(Thank goodness) No one goes to heaven because it is "just". Did you ask to be born? No? You're here. Where is the justice in that? Did you ask to die? No? You're going to. No justice there either? You're going to heaven because it is your Father's responsibility to take care of you. He gave "birth" to you, and He loves you.

Annihilationism is not foreign to pre-catholic Christianity.


11 Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away.
The dead are not alive, and the living will not die.~Thomas

A Gentile does not die, for he has never lived in order that he may die. He who has believed in the truth has found life, and this one is in danger of dying, for he is alive.~Philip


Kinda gives fresh meaning to "let the dead bury the dead", eh? I don't believe in a far off judgment day. Everyday is judgment day, and you are either dead, or alive. "Jesus answered him, "I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

strangertoo

sin is diabolical abuse of fellow humans-1John 3:8
Nov 2, 2011
2,337
15
UK
Visit site
✟25,141.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
This isn't math class.(Thank goodness) No one goes to heaven because it is "just". Did you ask to be born? No? You're here.

Where is the justice in that?
where is any injustice in it ?... before creation there was no 'I' and without creation there would not be an 'I' ... the spirit is ONE God ... the self exists briefly for God's purpose in it , to perfect love so all selves become happy before God 'moves on' to a new creation which equally begins and ends with no change to God... justice is 'seen' in creation only , in that God shows He is worthy to be called God of all men by bringing all to see themselves as freely choosing to love and be happy together in [automatically destructive] physical life of change, necessarily, temporal,temporary, transient... God doesn't even have time, change, God is simply ONE [united, indivisible] spirit , so physical life is a virtual reality to God , death means nothing and indeed all men are resurrected to the physical from the first and second deaths as God states and showed through Jesus, also translation to be free of death and the lack of any necessity for death if one simply did Love truly all folks in life to show one's Love of God ...

Did you ask to die? No? You're going to. No justice there either?
You are mistaken and I wonder why ... no-one has to die except to free folks from sin they are not prepared yet to give up themselves as man destroys this earth with sin ... no problem for God to make another universe and new earth , but clearly there would be no point if the same just happened again... so God establishes Jesus' kingdom of pure righteousness to Love FIRST in the new earth , so that many , countless many, all destroyed in this earth BY THEMSELVES , by their way of life [so it is justly , because they refuse to listen to God's advice on how to avoid it , they choose what to believe in , Satan, and so get it wrong], countless many of the many destroyed for sin in this earth are saved because of the Love of the few in this earth by which the kingdom of Love of God and Jesus Christ is built to guide the many to God's Truth of love in the new universe... it is indeed very just, God is not forcing anyone , just advising TRULY , unlike Satan's tales of the benefits of sin which in fact all brings misery and death... in simple terms, Satan pretends to be God, but he LIES... 2Thess 2:4 ... that is unjust and he dies for it [Ezek 28] ,but so does almost every man in this earth because they fail to listen to God , fail to perfect their Love in life... fail to see that sin leads to death, Love leads beyond not only death, but beyond physical life ...

You're going to heaven because it is your Father's responsibility to take care of you. He gave "birth" to you, and He loves you.
that doesn't change that one must be persuaded not to sin in order to Love... God cannot choose to stop sinning for one...

11 Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away.
The dead are not alive, and the living will not die.~Thomas

that is counter to even common sense , as well as much scripture ...

Mark 12:27 He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err.

the spirit of a man is the endlessness of man, the essence of man and is indestructible, of God, just as 'alive' as God is :-

Ecclesiastes 12:7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

A Gentile does not die, for he has never lived in order that he may die. He who has believed in the truth has found life, and this one is in danger of dying, for he is alive.~Philip


pretty confused and rather obviously false ... gentiles live - and die to remove their sin [Rom 6:7] ...a very few gentiles even cease to be gentiles, become Israel and may in fact never die, but live until translated to 'life' of the spirit ... BY believing the Truth of Love of God , by ceasing to abuse with sin...

Kinda gives fresh meaning to "let the dead bury the dead", eh?
hardly ... Jesus was simply indicating that there is nothing else to be done in THIS earth for those who choose to sin all their life... that deathbed and burial ritual is just superstition [as one has to perfect Love IN LIFE to be a saint else one will indeed die a sinner]

I don't believe in a far off judgment day.
the term 'judgement day' is one of Satan's many subtle deceptions... just consider that the few saints are indeed JUDGED to be saints by God at Jesus' return... and indeed Jesus was judged by God before translation to spirit some time after resurrection to the flesh [never died a second time]

the 'Great white Throne' judgement is simply the time when most men are saved [by WORKS- Rev 20:13] - Rev 7:9-10 , after death frees all sinners that even lived from sin to Live by Love in the kingdom of Jesus or be excluded in a second death for sin whilst those countless many who CHOOSE to Love are saved by translation or works of Love after death Rom 6:7

Everyday is judgment day, and you are either dead, or alive.
well one can choose any day to judge oneself and come more alive by choosing to Love , not sin... but there is no FINAL judgement of who are the FEW saved first in THIS earth until Jesus' return... so whilst 'poetic', your statement is literally false ... anyone can at any time decide to choose Love, reject abuse with sin... and after trial of Love to PROVE one is not fooling oneself [and spirit baptism by God to show one ALL one's sins one hides even from oneself and ENABLE one to fool all Satan's subtlest lies about the desirability of sins of all kinds] ... but there is a cut-off at Jesus' return, few are ready to Love by then, but enough to build the kingdom of Jesus... by 'judgement day' countless many in the new earth have chosen Love and perfected it in works and are saved free of another death to free them from sin, no need ...

but the mercy of God goes on , never ends in finite time it takes for all to see sin doesn't make anyone happy eventually... the final judgement is the judgement of Satan when he ceases to be Satan [it only means adversary] and perfects his Love in the final baptism of fire in the lake of fire , God's prodigal son...

"Jesus answered him, "I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise."
"Jesus answered him, "I tell you the truth today - you will be with me in paradise."

clearly Jesus' spirit was in 'hell' that particular day, seemingly not paradise :-

Acts 2:31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Soulgazer

Christian Gnostic
Feb 24, 2011
3,748
90
Visit site
✟26,903.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Sorry Stranger.. I'm very sure you believe that. I was taught otherwise. You may argue with the authors when you meet them.

There are people who insist that Jesus said "I tell you the truth today". But that implies he wasn't telling the truth on other days.

There wasn't anyone close enough to hear them converse....it was the author saying that you pass from the living to the living, and that death had been defeated.

Don't confuse justice and injustice for Love. Justice is an animal desire.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What do you think of the "justice" of eternal torture?

Hello again Timothew, and thanks for the invite. I have through a few pages but not all of them, lol.

First I would ask you where you get the term "eternal torture?"

Very much look forward to this conversation, based upon what I have read. I would ask that since this topic is centered on God's word and the teaching that is found there that responses focus on what scripture teaches. Extra-biblical resources carry very little weight with me, and often in this particular debate it is sidetracked by references to books and words of men, rather than the word of God and the books of the Bible, which is the source for the Doctrine of Eternal Punisment.

God bless.
 
Upvote 0

Soulgazer

Christian Gnostic
Feb 24, 2011
3,748
90
Visit site
✟26,903.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You may ask, but the question was directed at me, and Tim knows the Bible carries no more weight for me than any other Christian scripture. I believe that it is the word of men as all scripture is, and puts forth the opinion of those men. Not all of us are catholic, and the anthology that you call "the Bible" is an anthology compiled by catholics for the promotion of catholicism. I am not going to be restrained by the superstition of others.

I don't mean to sound harsh, but this is a conversation, not a debate, and if others opinions are so invaluable to you, you may end up feeling uncomfortable.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Hello again Timothew, and thanks for the invite. I have through a few pages but not all of them, lol.

First I would ask you where you get the term "eternal torture?"

Very much look forward to this conversation, based upon what I have read. I would ask that since this topic is centered on God's word and the teaching that is found there that responses focus on what scripture teaches. Extra-biblical resources carry very little weight with me, and often in this particular debate it is sidetracked by references to books and words of men, rather than the word of God and the books of the Bible, which is the source for the Doctrine of Eternal Punisment.

God bless.
Have you read Jonathan Edwards sermon "Sinners in the hands of an angry God"?

He goes into great detail about how the lost are burned alive in hell. Tormentists claim that the lost are going to suffer forever in a burning lake of fire. I don't think that burning alive can be said to be anything other than torture. Of course tormentalists don't like it when I say that being set on fire and kept alive forever while your skin is charring away is torture.

According to the bible the wages of sin is death, not eternal conscious torment. Read John 3:16. The two results are "perish" or "have eternal life". 2 Thess 1:9 says the penalty is eternal destruction. Revelation says the lake of fire is the second death. Ezekiel 18:4 says that the soul that sins will die. Paul said that death entered the world because of sin. Jesus said that the way is wide that leads to destruction (not eternal conscious torment).
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You may ask, but the question was directed at me,

And I will have to guess, since no designation is given, that this response is directed to me.

Are you against someone fielding a question or response directed specifically to someone else? If you are, you may feel a little uncomfortable with me in this discussion...conversation...debate...lol.


and Tim knows the Bible carries no more weight for me than any other Christian scripture.

You say this as if it is supposed to mean something. You are not the only one that has denied the word of God, my friend...it is an ancient tradition.

I believe that it is the word of men as all scripture is, and puts forth the opinion of those men.

And I am very sorry for you.

What then...do you base your beliefs on?

I can already tell you...on the word and opinions of men. You can deny it, but consider that you will not offer a single original thought that has not been embraced by one before you, of that I am fairly confident.

But we will see, as the discussion progresses. You may surprise me.


Not all of us are catholic,

Not sure what Catholicism has to do with anything I have said, if in fact you were speaking to me, lol.

and the anthology that you call "the Bible" is an anthology compiled by catholics for the promotion of catholicism.

Moses was a Catholic?

Or do you mean that Catholics have conspired to fool mankind?

lol

Honestly, if you would get out of the books of men, you might, by the impact of the word of God, be convinced that His word is true.

I am not going to be restrained by the superstition of others.

But that is all you have. Any concept that is among men in regards to religion is just that...superstition.

Unless of course one has witnessed demonic power at work, but that is a different topic, and I have not as yet seen someone profess such activity or experience directly (specifically).

I don't mean to sound harsh,

Don't worry about it, it is priority in my responses not to let emotion direct my thoughts or statements.

Please speak your mind...that is where the rubber meets the road, lol.

but this is a conversation, not a debate,

According to who's definition?

Certainly not yours. You have submitted an opposing view, made statements of opinion...and you do not see yourself as antagonistic?

and if others opinions are so invaluable to you, you may end up feeling uncomfortable.

Your interpretation of my statement is incorrect: it is not a general "I don't care what people think," if I did not, I would not be here, now would I?

It is a matter of extrabiblical resources that I am not interested in. If I did not make that clear, I apologize. But I do think I made it clear, and the fact that I have asked for the individual's view of scripture, rather than the individual's view of another's individual's viewpoint as taken from the books men have produced...shows clearly that I do take an interest in the viewpoints and opinions of others.

Please try not to insert what you want to believe into what I hhave said, it will make this debate (and you have set the tone) much more enjoyable, and I will not have to waste time responding to something irrelevant which is the construct of my "antagonist."

God bless.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Have you read Jonathan Edwards sermon "Sinners in the hands of an angry God"?

Hello Timothew.

Not exactly an answer to the question, but thanks for the response and especially for providing scripture which you have for a basis of your belief. I don't have much time, but I think perhaps you have given enough to get the discussion off to a great start.

Yes, actually I have. However, I must say that I am not quite so impressed with the theology of the "greats" as some people are. Don't really have time to get into that right now, so suffice it to say that as Children of God, we have a mandate to verify the preaching and teaching which we sit under and are exposed to.

One thing that I am opposed to is the common trend of believers to latch on to the work that the Lord has done in other men's lives. Rather than allowing God to speak to them Himself as they immerse themselves in scripture, which God in His mercy has provided that we might know Him better, and to the extent which we can in this body.


He goes into great detail about how the lost are burned alive in hell.

Most agree that there will be degrees of punishment in Hell. All according, even as believers will be judged, to the knowledge one possesses and what they do with that knowledge. This is why scripture gives dire warning for those that know the truth, but reject it knowingly. They believe that Jesus is the Christ, but want nothing to do with Him, as they are steeped in rebellion, doing despite unto the Spirit of Grace.

Fire represents judgment in many passages. Some take a hyper literal view of this and, like Edwards, present the picture you mention. It is also unfortunate that some preachers try to scare people into salvation, denying God's capability to bring a man to repentance and belief, whereby He saves them.

As we get into this conversation, there will be, I hope, a few things that you may not have considered before. But we will see. But, what I have to ask, Timothew, is that you refrain from assuming that my belief is founded upon the work which God has done in other men's lives, so that rather than presupposing what it is I believe and the sciptural basis for that, you will better be able to recognize what it is I am presenting as my basis. If you lump me in with those from before, it is entirely possible you may overlook what I present.

I will break this up, as is my habit, both to keep each post short and more easily answered, as well as to break some of this into separate issues, which should also make responses easier.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I didn't bring up Edwards because I believe that you are influenced by him.
I brought him up because you asked why I use the word "torture". He is a traditionalist, and his sermons illustrate why I call the torture of sinners "torture" and not torment.

I would rather forget Edwards completely and I wish everyone else would too, due to his sadistic POV.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Tormentists claim that the lost are going to suffer forever in a burning lake of fire.

the fact that you designate those that hold to this position as "tormentists" shows that an objective discussion may be difficult for you. I hope that is not the case, but we will see.

It is not "tormentists" that originated this doctrine, but the Lord Himself.

The first thing concerning Hell to do is distinguish between Hell and Hades, so as to keep in context that which the Lord is teaching. For example, in Luke 16 the Lord teaches concerning Hades, and places this story in the Age of Law...which only makes sense, seeing that He had not gone to the Cross at this point.

In Revelation 20 the punishment that the wicked receive is described as the Lake of Fire. "Tormentists" did not originate that designation...God did.

But we go back to the use of fire to describe judgment. We see applied both to Believers and non0believers alike.


1 Corinthians 3:15

King James Version (KJV)


15 If any man's work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.



Do you believe this, Timothew?

But wait, shall we believe the terminology describes the works of believers to go through fire...or is it just saying that they will be judged?

It is no different when we speak of the punishment of the wicked...they will be judged.

I will at this point ask you to answer the question posed in my initial response to you:


First I would ask you where you get the term "eternal torture?"


Because we will look at the terms used by the Lord and we will see that in fact the word "torture" could be used to describe their punishment, though we will see this in it's historical meaning, rather than the modern usage, which demands a negative view.

But, we will also see that punishment is exactly that, punishment, and without question scripture defines it as everlasting, leaving no room for annihilation.



I don't think that burning alive can be said to be anything other than torture.




But that's just it...they are not alive, they are dead, though they are conscious. But consider this: all those born into this world are, by spiritual definition...dead.

Apart from Christ a man does not have life. And this is where those that adhere to soul sleep and annihilation (for the two usually go hand in hand) make the critical mistake of not understanding such a simple truth in scripture. They do not distinguish between the temporal (earthly) and the eternal (spiritual).

They make "soul" to mean the immaterial aspect of men, when the fact is that soul is primarily a reference to the person as a whole, such as "how many souls were aboard the ship."

Simple, basic truths...overlooked. I hope you will give this some consideration as we delve into this topic.

Of course tormentalists




"Tormentists" sounds better...lol.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I didn't bring up Edwards because I believe that you are influenced by him.
I brought him up because you asked why I use the word "torture". He is a traditionalist, and his sermons illustrate why I call the torture of sinners "torture" and not torment.

I would rather forget Edwards completely and I wish everyone else would too, due to his sadistic POV.

So Edwards designated himself a tormentist?

I have to be getting ready to go to an apple festival, though I would rather be here. It is a great topic of discussion. I will try to get one more in before I have to go, so I hope youwill be patient with me.

God bless.
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Why do you object to the term "tormentist"?
I am called an "Annihilationist".
You claim that the tormentist doctrine comes right from Jesus. That is begging the quuestion. You assume that he teaches what you believe. Would it have any weight with you if I said "It is not 'Annihilationists' would originated this doctrine, but the Lord Himself"? After all, the Lord said "The way is wide that leads to destruction".
He didn't say "The way is wide that leads to torment".

Tormentist is just a way to identify the key players in this debate.
There are 3 sides, Tormentists (who believe the lost are tormented), Annihilationists (who believe the lost are destroyed), and Universalists (who believe the lost are reconciled to God, universally).

I sometimes slip and refer to the tormentists as tormentalists. Sorry about that. It is a mis-spelling, not an insult.
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So Edwards designated himself a tormentist?

I have to be getting ready to go to an apple festival, though I would rather be here. It is a great topic of discussion. I will try to get one more in before I have to go, so I hope youwill be patient with me.

God bless.

I don't know what else to designate those who believe in torment. They want to be called "the only true believers". So do I.
Okay, Let's put the discussion on hold. An Apple Festival sounds like fun.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
don't like it when I say that being set on fire and kept alive forever while your skin is charring away is torture.

And it is. But consider (and I apologize for bringing a previous response to the table, but I am pressed for time):

Now let us look at a few more passages that speak about the conditions of that judgment. One passage that one needs to consider is Luke 16, in which the Lord taught a place of torment (and I will just use a few key verses to illustrate this, it is up to the reader to examine this in full on his own):


Torment




Luke 16


22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;


23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.






27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:


28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.




Torment is:


931. basanos bas'-an-os perhaps remotely from the same as 939 (through the notion of going to the bottom); a touch-stone, i.e. (by analogy) torture:--torment.



(NOTE-that in the definition which follows ":--" are the English words that translate basanos, not definitions themselves)



There are two conclusions one can come to concerning the story the Lord gives in this passage: 1) it is a parable; 2) it is an account of an actual event.


I take the latter position based upon the fact that names are given and real people are spoken of in the account (i.e. Abraham).



This does not speak of Hell, but of Hades, which some such as myself believe to be the place of the dead after death. Before the Cross, both just and unjust dwelt there after death, both parties separated from each other: the just comforted and the unjust, as in this story...in torment.

One thing to consider in this is that this account is given before the Cross, and falls, without doubting, under the Age of Law, as verified by the Lord Himself:




27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:


28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.


29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.




No mention of the Cross or Christ is made, the brethren of the rich man have Moses and the Prophets, which we see here is sufficient in that Age to make man just. A preview of the Cross is given:




30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.


31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.




The account bears witness to the fact that even the resurrection of one dead is not enough to convince sinners. Sad...but true. Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. Scripture is key to repentance, and those that lived before the revelation of the mystery of Christ were provided enough to place their faith in God our Savior.


And at this point we again contrast our teaching on Hell with the provision of God. In every Age He has revealed enough to man that he might not suffer that which the rich man suffers here. Every man, every woman...has been given opportunity for faith and salvation, and it is by conscious choice they reject the provision of God our Savior, Who is not willing that any should perish.


So we see that it is not unjust for God to punish those that reject His gracious offer, but reflects the Holy Nature of God. What would be an injustice would be for God to say He is unwilling that any should perish, then withhold the means for one to escape destruction.

And we know God does not do that.



Having looked at an account which the Lord gave, knowing that this was not a baseless account but given to illustrate and warn of the danger of judgment after one's physical death, let us look at a "torment" which does pertain to Hell, which is, the Lake of Fire:




Matthew 8:28-29


King James Version (KJV)



28 And when he was come to the other side into the country of the Gergesenes, there met him two possessed with devils, coming out of the tombs, exceeding fierce, so that no man might pass by that way.


29 And, behold, they cried out, saying, What have we to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God? art thou come hither to torment us before the time?




Torment here is:



928. basanizo bas-an-id'-zo from 931; to torture:--pain, toil, torment, toss, vex.




What exactly is it that these devils fear? What do they mean "torment us before the time?"



Consider:



Revelation 20:10


King James Version (KJV)



10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.





A couple of things to consider here: first we see that the demons have knowledge of their impending judgment, and they are afraid and ask to be cast into swine rather than go into eternal torment.


Secondly, they recognize it as torment...not annihilation. There is no connotation of cessation of existance associated with the teachings here.


Lastly we see in a couple of places where not just Satan, not just devils, but men...enter into this torment. As seen not just in Revelation 20:10 (where we know Antichrist and the false prophet are men), but here as well:




Revelation 14:9-11


King James Version (KJV)



9 And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand,


10 The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:


11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.




This refers to those in the Tribulation that worship the Beast, and they are men. They will come into judgment (v.10) and their torment is described in terms which signify unending torment.


Advocates of Annihilation miss the fact that it is their torment, not their bodies, which is pictured in terms of burning, producing smoke which "ascends for ever and ever." In order for one's torment to continue, it is reasonable that the one sufferiung that torment does as well, which is also taught by Christ, Who quotes the Old Testament to present this same picture:




Mark 9:43-44


King James Version (KJV)



43 And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched:


44 Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched.





According to Annihilationists, the worm must die, and the fire is quenched, contrary to what the Lord teaches concerning Hell. Most do not consider that the wicked, like the Just, will be resurrected, and that they will receive bodies suitable for eternal punishment. The imagery of a garbage dump is used here, where it is said that fires continually burned and maggots continually fed. We do not have to necessarily apply that to the concept of Hell, as one said earlier in this post (rightly, I believe), the horror of eternal judgment is separation from God itself. The rich man bemoaned his brethren...which is a torment that would exceed a physical burning, if you ask me. Many will remember the times they were given the Gospel, when they were being drawn by the Holy Spirit unto repentance, where they crossed that line and though they were brought to a point of belief...rejected the One that could save them.


Continued...
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't know what else to designate those who believe in torment. They want to be called "the only true believers". So do I.
Okay, Let's put the discussion on hold. An Apple Festival sounds like fun.

lol...I think it will be, and I am looking forward to a fresh apple taken from the source itself.

Look forward to this discussion, Timothew.

God bless.
 
Upvote 0

Timothew

Conditionalist
Aug 24, 2009
9,659
844
✟36,554.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
When we continue please bring your objections to conditional immortality forth one at a time so we can discuss them. Otherwise, I can't devote the proper time to each one.

In Luke 16, the man says that his brothers are still alive. So this parable can't be explaining the final punishment.

You had other objections, that I want to discuss one by one. But I don't want to do it now. Have fun at the festival.
 
Upvote 0

DrBubbaLove

Roman Catholic convert from Southern Baptist
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2004
11,336
1,728
65
Left coast
✟100,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This isn't math class.(Thank goodness) No one goes to heaven because it is "just". Did you ask to be born? No? You're here. Where is the justice in that? Did you ask to die? No? You're going to. No justice there either? You're going to heaven because it is your Father's responsibility to take care of you. He gave "birth" to you, and He loves you.

Annihilationism is not foreign to pre-catholic Christianity.


11 Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass away.
The dead are not alive, and the living will not die.~Thomas

A Gentile does not die, for he has never lived in order that he may die. He who has believed in the truth has found life, and this one is in danger of dying, for he is alive.~Philip


Kinda gives fresh meaning to "let the dead bury the dead", eh? I don't believe in a far off judgment day. Everyday is judgment day, and you are either dead, or alive. "Jesus answered him, "I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise."
No one except the poor deluded folks who have stated here that both annihilationism and universalism represent more modern enlightend views would argue that this discussion is not thousands of years old. Of course we could find people writing about their understanding of the afterlife, that does not mean they were correct only that the same thoughts that occur to some today, occured to them also.

As far as being Just, that would be what a Judgement and reward (reconcile can be good or bad) would be all about. So I fail to see how Hell cannot be about Justice, no matter what one believes happens there.

Mat 5:12 "Rejoice and be glad, for your reward in heaven is great; for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.

Mat 6:1 "Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven.

Rev 22:12 "Behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to render to every man [fn]according to what he has done.
 
Upvote 0

P1LGR1M

Stranger
Jun 20, 2012
2,528
145
✟32,889.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When we continue please bring your objections to conditional immortality forth one at a time so we can discuss them.
Hello Timothew, take your pick. The length of some of these are necessary, really, because it takes more than a short paragragh to look at what is involved.

Surely there are more objections one can find in the posts so far than what is offered here.

But, I am glad for that one, as it is key to this issue, as mentioned ealier, distinguishing between Hades and Hell.

Otherwise, I can't devote the proper time to each one.

As I said, take your pick. I don't run the conversation, I simply respond to what is said.

In Luke 16, the man says that his brothers are still alive. So this parable can't be explaining the final punishment.

And you are correct. It speaks of the Old Testament equivalent Sheol, and while atheits (and others) try to dance around this by claiming Babylonian influence, and others try to make this story a parable, despite the use of specific names of the people involved, we can say that it was given for some purpose, some teaching.

Why is it with the parables one can accept the teaching, yet with this one...they cannot?

In this we see the Lord speak of...


Luke 16

King James Version (KJV)

22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;

Physical death.

23 And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.

Existance after physical death.

(See v.28 for definition)

24 And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame.

Regret.

Torment (see here and here).

Recognition and acceptance of punishment, which does not lead to an appeal for release from the torment, merely relief within the torment.


25 But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented.

Unlike the caricature painted of those that recognize this teaching as that of Christ, Abraham states the condition...without gloating.

(same word as v.24)

26 And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence.

Separation between the just and the unjust.

27 Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house:

28 For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment.

Again regret, and a desire to save his family from this fate.

Again...torment, but another word this time:


931. basanos bas'-an-os perhaps remotely from the same as 939 (through the notion of going to the bottom); a touch-stone, i.e. (by analogy) torture:--torment.

And again I would point out that there is no "tormentor" present, the torment is the punishment itself. See here for other usage of this word.


29 Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.

Clear indication this is during the Age of Law, as they are directed to the Law, rather than Christ. And as I remarked earlier, this only makes sense since Christ has not yet died and resurrected.

In other words, The word of God is sufficient (and here the Hebrew scriptures) in this age for a man to be justified and escape hades. And it is clear that men are expected to...hear.


30 And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.

31 And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.


Just one passage that teaches that miracles are not a sure method of bringing saving faith. It is curious that there was a Lazarus that did indeed rise from the dead.

But the bottom line is this, Timothew: one must conclude the Lord was in the habit of using fairy tales in His teaching if they conclude that the Lord does not teach an afterlife here, as well as a conscious existence.

I do not, but see this as dire warning for those that reject the word of God.


You had other objections, that I want to discuss one by one.


Looking forward to it, Timothew.


But I don't want to do it now.

Nor do I, lol. I mean, I want to, but, it is late, and need to get some rest.


Have fun at the festival.

It was pretty good. A drive into the mountains is always a good time for me. When I was oung, I liked the beach, but now that I am older, one thing I know: not so much sand in the mountains...lol. (I hate sand)

The leaves are turning, winter is coming, and it was great to eat an apple fresh from the tree.

Again, looking forward to the conversation, one I haven't had for a little while, but one that I feel is of extreme importance. Certain doctrines are gaining great popularity in "modern Christendom," and this is one of them.

I will leave you with one question: do you also believe in soul sleep?

God bless.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.