Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Or maybe God told them, which is why they wrote it down in their Bible?
Espousing verbal plenary inspiration, are you? maybe mechanical inspiration (dictation)?
Only because when you agree with something, I disagree; and when I agree, you disagree.Just wondering why you're suddenly rejecting it.
Because it sounds suspiciously like the Bible itself can take a hike when you find it inconvenient.
Only because when you agree with something, I disagree; and when I agree, you disagree.
So when we both agree, your mental block confuses you.
Not.You're rejecting the Bible --
Not.
Not.But you are rejecting the possibility of verbal plenary inspiration...
Not.
This guy Rob Skiba is a bozo.Rob Skiba about the firmament and the canopy theory.
Genesis 1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
Genesis 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so.
Genesis 1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
Once again, let me open your eyes:It's a conspiracy!
Or maybe not. Okay, it's not exactly the same, but it's clearly a drawing "like that".
Once again, let me open your eyes:
Try to stretch the radius of the dome to the size of radius of the universe.
Once again, let me open your eyes:
Try to stretch the radius of the dome to the size of radius of the universe. Or, make the curvature go the other side. Or, make not just one, but many of such dome.
Any way, it does not violate the description.
Why would the authorship matter? Does not the drawing accurately reflect the information in your bible?
Notice that the sun, moon and stars are embedded in the firmament. The moon is much closer to us than the sun, which is much closer to us than the nearest star, which is much closer to us than the Pleiades, which is much closer to us than the Andromeda Galaxy, which is much closer to us than the 'size of the radius of the universe'. This model of the universe does not reflect reality.
Perhaps your own eyes aren't open enough:
Try to make the dome out of peanut butter. Or... try to make the Angels on the other side of the dome pay admission to enter and pass messages to the faithful down here. Or... imagine the whole thing on the back of a giant English Sheepdog named "Bosko."
Any way, it does not violate the description.
Consider all you said are true, what is the problem of this model?
You are not reasoning. Pretty bad response.
As I said before. "Notice that the sun, moon and stars are embedded in the firmament."
This means the model has them all being the same distance away from the surface of the earth. The moon is not the same distance away from us as the stars.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?