Let the Reckoning Begin

[essentialsaltes]

What is the religion of atheists?

The religion of equality.

Nope.

 

[iluvatar5150]

The self-called progressives of this world want us to keep quiet about the sexualization of children.'Shhh just let it happen'.

Discussions of transgenderism aren’t “sexualizing” anybody any more than marketing pink dresses to girls and baseball mitts to boys sexualizes them. Where were your complaints about that?

It’s you guys who eagerly gobble up every bit of anti-trans propaganda you can find who keep making this about diddling. Transgenderism isn’t about boinking people or who you get to boink. Why do you keep talking like it is?

But you know what does sexualize kids? Youth marriages and kiddy beauty pageants that are popular among conservatives. I’ve never heard conservatives complain about those or about all the kids movies that feature straight characters falling in love.

 

[driewerf]

Uuh, the reckoning, this is sure to be an interesting... aaand it's another thread about other people's genitals. *Sigh*

Isn't that what the Internet is for - the display of genitalia?

 

[ozso]

Discussions of transgenderism aren’t “sexualizing” anybody any more than marketing pink dresses to girls and baseball mitts to boys sexualizes them. Where were your complaints about that?

It’s you guys who eagerly gobble up every bit of anti-trans propaganda you can find who keep making this about diddling. Transgenderism isn’t about boinking people or who you get to boink. Why do you keep talking like it is?

But you know what does sexualize kids? Youth marriages and kiddy beauty pageants that are popular among conservatives. I’ve never heard conservatives complain about those or about all the kids movies that feature straight characters falling in love.

Anti-trans propaganda isn't needed. What trans-activists have to say is plenty sufficient. Right at the time trans-ideology started being taught in elementary schools, schools also started acquiring books for children that have material that's so obscene, school board members can't tolerate them being read out loud by parents at school board meetings. That says enough about what's really going on right there.

 

[BCP1928]

The self-called progressives of this world want us to keep quiet about the sexualization of children.'Shhh just let it happen'.

What do you mean by "sexualizing" children? Children sexualize themselves. It's part of their natural growth to adulthood and happens whether we interfere with it or not. Their minds and bodies gradually become mature. They gradually become sexual adults just as they grow taller and more robust. What do you want to do about it?

 

[ozso]

What do you mean by "sexualizing" children? Children sexualize themselves. It's part of their natural growth to adulthood and happens whether we interfere with it or not. Their minds and bodies gradually become mature. They gradually become sexual adults just as they grow taller and more robust. What do you want to do about it?

Right at the time trans-ideology started being taught in elementary schools, schools also started acquiring books for children that have material that's so sexually graphic, school board members can't tolerate them being read out loud by parents at school board meetings. That says enough about what's really going on right there.

 

[BCP1928]

Right at the time trans-ideology started being taught in elementary schools, schools also started acquiring books for children that have material that's so sexually graphic, school board members can't tolerate them being read out loud by parents at school board meetings. That says enough about what's really going on right there.

What does that have to do with the ongoing process of sexualization? Do you think it would stop if we stop exposing them to what you call pornography? Do you think the kids would grow up to be asexual beings incapable of reproducing?

 

[ozso]

What does that have to do with the ongoing process of sexualization? Do you think it would stop if we stop exposing them to what you call inappropriate contentography? Do you think the kids would grow up to be asexual beings incapable of reproducing?

If it's not inappropriate contentography, then why do school board members start yelling "STOP! STOP!!" when it's being read out loud. Explaining sex to young children has always been done in a way that's appropriate to their age level. Now sexually explicit graphic material is being given to them along with their trans-ideology training.

"We're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children!".

 

[RileyG]

What is the religion of atheists?

The religion of equality.

You can't have equality if there are two different sexes. There needs to be a queering of everybody. Welcome to the trans movement. Sitting in the background, and very happy to help, is China.

Why China-Based BILLIONAIRES Are Funding the U.S. Trans Movement - YouTube [57 seconds long]

This is part of China's warfare against the West.

The Must-See 12-Minute Documentary on the Transgender Movement - Daily Declaration

All part of a bigger movement. In the video below, James Lindsey gives an almost 2 hour talk on the Woke movement. It was so interesting that I watched the whole thing over a few days.

Woke is Marxism Evolved to Take on the West | STARRS

Interesting since LGBT is considered taboo in many parts of China.

 

[Belk]

Eventually in retrospect this is going to looked upon the same as lobotomies and other medical/surgical monstrosities.The great thing about medicine coupled with science is it comes to with every better solutions. Let's hope that a much easier and more elegant solution to the issues people face presents itself.

 

[BCP1928]

"We're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children!".

I think that's cruel. They know they can't turn your kids gay but that you believe they can, so they taunt you.

 

[ozso]

I think that's cruel. They know they can't turn your kids gay but that you believe they can, so they taunt you.

G for gay is just one letter in LGBTQQIP2SAA+. So what about all the other stuff? They don't want to turn your kid "gay", they want your kid to have the mindset that they can be anything and everything or a combination thereof. Lots of young people now have whole cocktail of what they "identify as".

 

[BCP1928]

G for gay is just one letter in LGBTQQIP2SAA+. So what about all the other stuff? They don't want to turn your kid "gay", they want your kid to have the mindset that they can be anything and everything or a combination thereof. Lots of young people now have whole cocktail of what they "identify as".

Lumping all those trait variants together is merely political and you should not take it as descriptive of anything real. What is really under attack is the notion that there is only one package of traits that is acceptable for each biology. Or (referring to my latest post in American Politics) that the outliers are "wrong." Take, for example, a biological male with many of the traits we normally associate with a biological female. What do we do with that person? Make him stay in the closet? Allow him to live his public life as a woman? Allow him to have himself surgically altered so he can function superficially as a biological woman? To my mind, the best thing for most people like that would be to do as in some other cultures, let him live openly as what he is: a biological male with female traits, effectively accepting it as a third recognized gender. (and a fourth, for biological females with mostly male traits.)

 

[Vambram]

I think they mean the “science of biology”, not “biology as I understand it to be”.

Creationism has a very clear and rational understanding of biology. One does not have to be an evolutionist in order to have a rational, clear, and scientific understanding of biology.

 

[Vambram]

But you know what does sexualize kids? Youth marriages and kiddy beauty pageants that are popular among conservatives

I am a conservative who strongly objects to youth marriages and kiddy beauty pageants.

 

[BCP1928]

Creationism has a very clear and rational understanding of biology.

That may be, but creationists as individuals rarely seem to.

One does not have to be an evolutionist in order to have a rational, clear, and scientific understanding of biology.

Anyone may use the theory instrumentally. One does not have to accept its ontological claims.

 

[Nithavela]

Creationism has a very clear and rational understanding of biology. One does not have to be an evolutionist in order to have a rational, clear, and scientific understanding of biology.

 

[Vambram]

That may be, but creationists as individuals rarely seem to.

Don't you mean that they rarely seem to understand it the way that evolutionists do?

 

[BCP1928]

Don't you mean that they rarely seem to understand it the way that evolutionists do?

No, I don't mean that.

 

[Vambram]

No, I don't mean that.

Then, may I know what you did mean?