Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Least qualified Republican VP candidate?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Allahuakbar" data-source="post: 48427984" data-attributes="member: 192970"><p>Actually this is an actual application of memory. I remembered you claimed the Senator supported a position he did not, and you deliberately told untruth out of political animosity without regards for ethicality, morality, or your own claimed religious mores. I then spent about 7 minutes looking in my posting history to find it. It would have been faster, but I was using someone elses internet connection which was abysmally slow. </p><p></p><p>I do have files, I store them in a device called a brain. It was given to me for free, and admittedly it took a while to set it up. It requires constant updates and inputs, but Ive grown fond of it and it processes very well. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I have evidence where the complete opposite occurred of what you claimed happened. You have zero evidence that your claim is real. Yet you call me brainless. You have fallen into personal attack, not I. I simply said your memory has proven false in the past and is not a reliable source.</p><p></p><p>Here is what you are claiming. At a debate that apparently only you heard, Senator Obama supported a reparations policy. In the publicly available information Senator Obama specifically does not support reparations. So according to you, he supported reparations in one debate, completely reversed his position in the following debate, and no one caught it. This would be a political faux pas of monumental proportions, and it passed without comment, despite the fact that representatives from both campaign would have been in attendance at any debate and been carefully analyzing every comment for political fodder. What you are claiming happened is simply inconceivable. </p><p></p><p>What I am claiming is that you simply created a story, had no clue what the truth was, and stuck by it in order to smear a politician you did not agree with. It is quite possible that your opinion is racist, and you simply assumed that a black Democrat must support reparations and felt your falsehood had a possibility of truth, so you could get away with it.</p><p></p><p>As it is I am the only person who has provided evidence and facts, so it seems the ball is in your court, but you have failed to act. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You claimed the Senator supports reparations. I provided evidence that the Senator does not support reparations. Unless some evidence is provided to the contrary, it cannot be assumed that your claim is true. Your claim above is simply saying that anything you say is true unless specifically proven wrong. So the evidence provided is not really evidence, since you claim to have heard the support a few days earlier (or whatever time period it is). </p><p></p><p>This is absurd. You cannot smear anyone and then say Well you cannot prove it did NOT happen. This is childish, and based on the false witness standards established in Christian theology, morally wrong. </p><p></p><p>Let me reiterate, you have no evidence at all. Evidence exists that clearly and unambiguously contradicts you. Neither the Senator, no anyone else for that matter, is guilty until proven innocent based on your accusation. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again your ad hominem only belies the weakness of your claims and argumentation. In the above, all you show is your true colors and dedication to your claimed Christian faith, and nothing about me.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? How do you know this? He seemed to think Murphy Brown was a force for influencing societal mores and standards. I thought Murphy Brown was a character in a sitcom, and not a very good sitcom at that. I also thought Harry Potter was fantasy too, however, so maybe I am just perceptive. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think having a mother and father is a good thing. I do not think a single mother or father is an evil or horrible thing. I also do not think I am going to go out and buy yogurt because Michael on Burn Notice likes yogurt (I hate yogurt). I am a strong enough personality to NOT base my entire life on what I see on television. Maybe I am just exceptional?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Allahuakbar, post: 48427984, member: 192970"] Actually this is an actual application of memory. I remembered you claimed the Senator supported a position he did not, and you deliberately told untruth out of political animosity without regards for ethicality, morality, or your own claimed religious mores. I then spent about 7 minutes looking in my posting history to find it. It would have been faster, but I was using someone elses internet connection which was abysmally slow. I do have files, I store them in a device called a brain. It was given to me for free, and admittedly it took a while to set it up. It requires constant updates and inputs, but Ive grown fond of it and it processes very well. I have evidence where the complete opposite occurred of what you claimed happened. You have zero evidence that your claim is real. Yet you call me brainless. You have fallen into personal attack, not I. I simply said your memory has proven false in the past and is not a reliable source. Here is what you are claiming. At a debate that apparently only you heard, Senator Obama supported a reparations policy. In the publicly available information Senator Obama specifically does not support reparations. So according to you, he supported reparations in one debate, completely reversed his position in the following debate, and no one caught it. This would be a political faux pas of monumental proportions, and it passed without comment, despite the fact that representatives from both campaign would have been in attendance at any debate and been carefully analyzing every comment for political fodder. What you are claiming happened is simply inconceivable. What I am claiming is that you simply created a story, had no clue what the truth was, and stuck by it in order to smear a politician you did not agree with. It is quite possible that your opinion is racist, and you simply assumed that a black Democrat must support reparations and felt your falsehood had a possibility of truth, so you could get away with it. As it is I am the only person who has provided evidence and facts, so it seems the ball is in your court, but you have failed to act. You claimed the Senator supports reparations. I provided evidence that the Senator does not support reparations. Unless some evidence is provided to the contrary, it cannot be assumed that your claim is true. Your claim above is simply saying that anything you say is true unless specifically proven wrong. So the evidence provided is not really evidence, since you claim to have heard the support a few days earlier (or whatever time period it is). This is absurd. You cannot smear anyone and then say Well you cannot prove it did NOT happen. This is childish, and based on the false witness standards established in Christian theology, morally wrong. Let me reiterate, you have no evidence at all. Evidence exists that clearly and unambiguously contradicts you. Neither the Senator, no anyone else for that matter, is guilty until proven innocent based on your accusation. Again your ad hominem only belies the weakness of your claims and argumentation. In the above, all you show is your true colors and dedication to your claimed Christian faith, and nothing about me. Really? How do you know this? He seemed to think Murphy Brown was a force for influencing societal mores and standards. I thought Murphy Brown was a character in a sitcom, and not a very good sitcom at that. I also thought Harry Potter was fantasy too, however, so maybe I am just perceptive. I think having a mother and father is a good thing. I do not think a single mother or father is an evil or horrible thing. I also do not think I am going to go out and buy yogurt because Michael on Burn Notice likes yogurt (I hate yogurt). I am a strong enough personality to NOT base my entire life on what I see on television. Maybe I am just exceptional? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Least qualified Republican VP candidate?
Top
Bottom