• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

LDS LDS persecution complex

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,897
14,168
✟458,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private

Well that's disgusting.

Still, I don't want to seem like I'm arguing degree here, but some people pouring glue into the locks of a meeting house or whatever is really not comparable to having your church blown up by suicide bombers. It's vandalism, not terrorism.


Okay, see. There ya go. I would count that as persecution (even though it's not really theologically-based as things are in the Middle East/North Africa, it's still restricting your rights, and that's not acceptable). Thank you for informing me of this.


It appears that the LDS still operate in Russia, but have had to change the name which their missionaries operate under. Seems like kind of a grey area there, probably due to the (intentional?) vagueness of the law.

Also, if you take the third comment on that story as truthful, it seems that when Mormons used to work in Mexico under similar restrictions, they went by an acronym "M.I.A"...combine that with the missionary dress code, and I could see how that could get mutated into fears about Mormonism being connected to shady government agency activities/CIA front groups. (That in no way excuses any acts of violence against Mormons or their properties in Mexico or anywhere else, I just found it interesting; the comment-writer even quips that they were "the original Men In Black" -- that's not really a good thing in many contexts, but maybe Mormon missionaries of the time or now don't really understand the culture they're going into sometimes, same as any other missionaries.)

As of the 1990s, when a relative of mine was serving in South America, the rumors were still in circulation and - along with the perception that all Americans are rich - was still a massive stumbling block for efforts in the region.

Well...I think that's a bit further than the kind of thing I was talking about. Basic rights and making things easy for foreign missionaries are not at all the same thing. If you encounter people who do not trust you or want you around, that's not persecution in itself.



See the last comment above about the difference between having basic rights (which Mormons do) and having an easy time/less opposition to your movement (which neither Mormons nor anyone else could possibly be guaranteed in any way).

Also, don't miss the point I was making as you throw all this irrelevant stuff: The Mormons fielded a seriously-considered candidate for the presidency of the United States. Maybe it wasn't easy, but you did it, and were allowed to do it, and were quite successful. And rather than being forced to hide his Mormonism, I remember that at that time the media coverage on Romney focused a lot of interest on his beliefs. Granted, not all of it was positive, but it was not hidden, and to the extent that it was a deciding factor in his loss (which I'm not sure it was), that was manifested on the basis of individual choice on the part of those who would not vote for a Mormon, not on any a priori restrictions on voting for a Mormon comparable to the type that plague Christian and other religious or ethnoreligious minorities in various places throughout the world and account for the lack of representation in society commensurate with their numbers (which is what you would expect in a truly meritocratic society, particularly as Christians are generally better educated in the Middle East and North Africa than others), as discussed with regard to Egypt in the video of HG Bishop Suriel of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Australia.

So yeah... a lot of things went down.

Some things. I definitely agree with you on the Ghana situation, which I was unaware of (and I am glad that the ban is no longer in place), but the rest of this stuff is not really comparable to what I am talking about, which are incidents of preplanned physical attack spurred on by months of preaching targeted hatred in government-sanctioned religious, edcuational, and media institutions; blatant government-sponsored restriction on basic human rights; etc. There's nothing like that in any of your stories with the exception of the Ghana example. (I don't believe Russia counts, because LDS still operate legally in Russia, and not being able to call missionaries by that particular label is really a rather low level of 'oppression' when they can continue on as usual by simply saying that they are volunteers.)
 
Upvote 0

Ironhold

Member
Feb 14, 2014
7,625
1,467
✟209,507.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
It's vandalism, not terrorism.

Did you get to the part about the anthrax scares? Yeah; that's terrorism.


It's a recurring thing for more prominent critics of the church to go to some foreign country where the church doesn't have a strong presence and stir things up.

Israel? When Brigham Young University wanted to build an auxiliary there as a home base for students studying topics relating to the Middle East, a prominent critic tried to get the government to block the paperwork by alleging that the church would also use it as a base for missionaries. From what I understand, a lawyer the church hired in response to this was murdered because local militants regarded him as guilty by association.

Ghana? Like I said, word is that the ban was preceded by a prominent critic of the church lobbying the government.

South America? Ditto, and church members died as a result.

Wouldn't surprise me if some of these same individuals were at least partly to blame for what's going on in Russia.


The Russian politicos straight want us gone.

They basically want anyone who isn't Jewish, Eastern Orthodox, or Muslim out of the country, and we're being held up as the main cause celebre in getting it done.

Also, don't miss the point I was making as you throw all this irrelevant stuff: The Mormons fielded a seriously-considered candidate for the presidency of the United States.

Remind me - did any of JFK's opponents have employees who were caught pressing the Catholic issue? Or was that all just third parties?
 
Upvote 0

DominicBaptiste

Active Member
Oct 16, 2017
178
73
42
North Alabama
✟36,144.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I have a friend who was Mormon in his young adulthood and went to Mexico on a mission. I think he feels like he has to explain to people that Mormonism is just another boring conventional American phenomenon, like many churches. I kind of believe him, but I understand how people see it as "different" as well. I think it's ok for people to have their beliefs, but they just shouldn't expect others to change theirs. People don't have to agree with you to respect you. I usually talk to Mormon missionaries when I see them, especially because I ride my bike some. People have thought I was one before. The only time they [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]ed me off is when they came to my old apartment complex because we didn't allow solicitation, which I think they have a policy of disregarding, but other than that they don't bother me that much.
 
Reactions: Jane_Doe
Upvote 0