Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
why do you want to know the unknown ?Ok, but my point is that the discussion is about "What is the language of God and how is the creation and the process of it part of it",
Ok, but please, my point is that the discussion is about "What is the language of God and how is the creation and the process of it part of it", however, it seems that the discussion now went toward the human science that study the language called linguistics what has nothing to do with the language of God, or how God communicates Himself, it has nothing to do with the Word of God, for the Word is God.
John 12:v.49-50 - JESUS said: 49 - For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.Jesus said his words were spirit and the words he spoke were not his own, so like him, it's not the package, but what is in the package.
That part of my statement I meant more in a mundane way like the effect of yelling Shark! has at the beach ...While the prologue of St. John's Gospel reads "καὶ θεὸς ἦν ὁ λόγος", the proper translation into English is "and the Word was God". "God" is being applied to Word, rather than "Word" being applied to God.
In the beginning was the Word (Jesus).
And the Word (Jesus) was with God (the Father)
And the Word (Jesus) was God (Jesus, as the Word, distinct from the Father, is God).
The Eternal Logos is Himself truly God, as the only-begotten of the Father, "begotten before all ages" as we confess in the Nicene Creed.
-CryptoLutheran
why do you want to know the unknown ?
who was there but God alone prior to creation ?
the bible doesn't say what you are asking so what is the point ?
no one knows Gods language within the Trinity prior to creation.What you are asking has nothing to do with my reply to AV1611VET.
But we do know the language within the Trinity now since the Incarnation.
How did Son communicate with the Father in the gospels ?
no one knows Gods language within the Trinity prior to creation.
Since the incarnation? Oh no, the Word was made flesh only about two thousand years ago.But we do know the language within the Trinity now since the Incarnation.
This is why I'm a literalist.There are repetitive pictures that relate to overall patterns that depict the process found in the soul both collectively and individually, whose end and and beginning are found in the purpose of God, and to which this language speaks on multiple levels depending on where you behold it from, or where you are in the journey.
For instance what the woman was to Adam, Mount Sinai is to Israel, or light called out of darkness as a son called out of Egypt. The carrying away into Babylon a son/Israel wandering around in the wilderness (like Joseph in a field) or making a name for yourself depicted as a tower, or the treasure cities of pharaoh/flesh); which relates to us, and must be in type a first in Jerusalem, as one we are born of (as opposed to where christ was crucified, which is as Sodom and as Egypt).
Only a son abides in the house forever, which the promises to those overcome all speak to (and what we overcome, is as a bondwoman and her son/Barabbas/scapegoat (as opposed to the son we are) who is cast out/let go into the place of confusion (babylon/wilderness) of face we leave in respect to our soul and the truth of the mind we are born of (as something we enter or come to (of water and spirit (which speaks to process), and as to what light is the light of the city) which Abraham looked for as something relative to his own soul, and the son he was by the light of "My/Christ's day".
This is why I'm a literalist.
Does the phone book give you nightmares?
I thought Linnaeus did?Adam names everything ...
I thought Linnaeus did?
Given that flesh is the one who can speak, I'd say so.Flesh so to speak, names everything ...
No. Should I?Scott Husted said:So as a literalist do you believe knowledge grows on a tree?
Given that flesh is the one who can speak, I'd say so.No. Should I?
The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. This explains why there is a legion of soul-killing preachers around the earth through their sects, and dead churches, whose angels are also dead, and are killers of souls. Actually they have NAME that they live, but they are dead, like the angel of the church of Sardis.Given that flesh is the one who can speak, I'd say so.No. Should I?
What is the language of God and how is the creation and the process of it part of it?
My question was threefold ...
"What is the language of God and how is the creation and the process of it part of it?"
Would the language of God had any meaning without a tree, or a garden man is put in to tend and keep ... and why the leaves of a fig tree ... cohesive narrative or just happen to be the closest tree in proximity ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?