Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Kylie's Pool Challenge
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SelfSim" data-source="post: 75258462" data-attributes="member: 354922"><p>Ok .. so in your original post you (the hypothesist) stated <em>an untestable assumption</em>:</p><p>.. an unverifiable assumption of 'truth' made by the poser of the hypothetical (aka: you).</p><p></p><p>It depends entirely on your initial, unverfiable assumption.</p><p>Other responses based on the (objective) observation of the table and following the rules of logic, are just as equally 'true', (with the added benefit of also being <em>objectively</em> true). So <em>'Nice break'</em> is a consistent logical deduction, based on measurable observations that 'breaks' objectively occur, which can then be compared with your above initial <em>unverifiable assumption</em>.</p><p></p><p>PS: We can also show that your assumption may also be just another a belief .. because if we can't test it, we can then treat it as being a belief .. by objective definition.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SelfSim, post: 75258462, member: 354922"] Ok .. so in your original post you (the hypothesist) stated [I]an untestable assumption[/I]: .. an unverifiable assumption of 'truth' made by the poser of the hypothetical (aka: you). It depends entirely on your initial, unverfiable assumption. Other responses based on the (objective) observation of the table and following the rules of logic, are just as equally 'true', (with the added benefit of also being [I]objectively[/I] true). So [I]'Nice break'[/I] is a consistent logical deduction, based on measurable observations that 'breaks' objectively occur, which can then be compared with your above initial [I]unverifiable assumption[/I]. PS: We can also show that your assumption may also be just another a belief .. because if we can't test it, we can then treat it as being a belief .. by objective definition. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Kylie's Pool Challenge
Top
Bottom