Kylie's Pool Challenge, Mark II

[Speedwell]

You need a better analogy than that if you are looking at disproving Intelligent Design and Creationism.

I for one would not have a problem with both things and could believe them simultaneously. That the pool break, little break, I suppose a microcosm of the big break, aka Big Bang. But that there was a kind of "guiding force" if you will to the process and especially when it comes to origins of Life etc.

There may be, but there is no theological necessity that it be manifest in the behavior of natural phenomena as explored by science. A fully naturalistic abiogenesis and a fully naturalistic evolution are entirely consistent with divine creation.

 

[Pavel Mosko]

There may be, but there is no theological necessity that it be manifest in the behavior of natural phenomena as explored by science. A fully naturalistic abiogenesis and a fully naturalistic evolution are entirely consistent with divine creation.

Sure if they can ever make their case I could go from being a Christian Old Earth Creationist to a Christian Evolutionist.

But people don't realize just how much stuff is tuned to for human life. It's staggering. And pool hall analogies are not going to cut it.

 

[Speedwell]

Sure if they can ever make their case I could go from being a Christian Old Earth Creationist to a Christian Evolutionist.

But people don't realize just how much stuff is tuned to for human life. It's staggering. And pool hall analogies are not going to cut it.

Or human life is fine-tuned for the "stuff."

 

[FreeinChrist]

ADVISOR HAT


This thread is closed for staff review. ​