• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Kudos

DeanM

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2007
3,633
402
60
✟5,870.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Hi folks,

I just wanted to take a moment and thank you all for keeping level heads throughout the past few weeks here. The recent changes have been especially hard, and I have been a bit cranky throughout some of the process. If I offended anyone in Trad-Ad, I apologize.

Some of the issues have been quite stressful. On the whole, this community has done very well at keeping the peace among the forums.

I can't go into details, but I can say that the fruits of peace seem to be becoming more apparant each day.

Your restraint and grace has been exemplory. Kudos to you all.

Dean
 
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
Being forced to co-exist for so long was not fruitful for anybody.

I think they have forgotten who asked for the split this time, so now the accusation is that we're hiding. Fine, I'll take that, because it doesn't change the fact that some people aren't very good at hiding their anger when you take their punching bags away.

I think the whole reason we had to disallow the "type" of debating they brought here is getting blamed on the wrong people too, but I'll live with that also.

The end result is some peace, and it's nice to finally have that!
 
Upvote 0

DeanM

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2007
3,633
402
60
✟5,870.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Hi Trust,

Being forced to co-exist for so long was not fruitful for anybody.

I can understand that. Granted, I wasn't a part of this forum during the much of the "combined" days, but I saw enough heartache to realize what you're saying is very true. A lot of good people got hurt (in fact most, I think). Was it completely fruitless? I don't know. What counts now is going to be the future, and I believe that there is a very real chance at peace, now.


I think they have forgotten who asked for the split this time,


Maybe they have forgotten. They certainly supported the split, for the most part. There were a couple of votes that we'll never know the origin of. On the whole, Trust, I believe that you are quite correct that most of them supported the split.

But, truth be told, I would remiss to not offer myself up for blame in this split. I was the one who who started the poll in WWMC. Granted, that poll never did do what it was intended to do, which was to give any adventist wishing to discuss subjects that deviated from the Statement of Faith, and do so in an area where they could still enact a modest set of exclusionary rules for themselves. -edit I meant in the WWMC, that never happened.

The poll may have had an overall effect towards the forum split (I think it did). It may not have (which I doubt). So, the Progs did what they could for a split, and I like to think that I have helped them.

So, there's probably good reason to blame me just as much as anybody else for what happened. I admit to using "overly sensational" language when I wrote that poll. I realize that my calling the Progs "persecuted" was a drastic overstatement, and had negative repercussions by showing the Trads in a bad light.

I'd like to apologize to each and every one of you who was hurt by my characterizations. I'm truly sorry that anyone was hurt by my actions.


so now the accusation is that we're hiding.

Perhaps. Some may say that you've all wrapped yourselves in a legal net of safety to "hide." What anybody else thinks is not your problem. The SDAs have often found themselves in a similar position throughout history. Other people have quite a lot to say that has been quite negative. Saying that you're "hiding" is among those things.

But, CF allows all communities the right to protect themselves. It is written as to not be argued against. Your rights are there for a reason, and I have defended your rights in this regard.

If by "hiding" you have found safe haven for your discussions, then I applaud you. You have exercised your rights, and done so in a polite and responsible manner, on the whole. Given the severity of your past situation, I think you all did quite well.


Fine, I'll take that, because it doesn't change the fact that some people aren't very good at hiding their anger when you take their punching bags away.

I speak specifically at your restraint in the arena of cross-forum baiting. There's an announcement stickied at the top of the page about this, and it's there for a reason. The staff was starting to see a few shots fired across the boundaries of the forums, and we wanted it to stop.

Given the situation, I admit that this practice of CFB could have escalated into a real war. It did not. There were a few instances, but on the whole, I respect each and every one of the Trads for showing restraint.


I think the whole reason we had to disallow the "type" of debating they brought here is getting blamed on the wrong people too, but I'll live with that also.

The reason you altered your FSGs was well within your rights, and I will continue to support and defend your rights. You have not been told this, but the instigator that got D+D closed was very possibly me, as it was me that initiated the inspection of that forum. I did so because I saw that very few people were reading the FSGs, and violations were rampant. To me, the name of the forum was the problem. I pointed this out to upper staff as a possible cause of so many reports. To me, the average member would see "Debate" in the forum's name and go there to do just that.

I believe the wording I used was "report-mill."

While I was initiating a discussion among staff to find the best way to approach your community with the suggestion of altering the name of the forum, your old FSGs were found to be inadequate, and your forum was closed while new FSGs were decided upon.

I am violating my contract with CF to not disclose staff actions. I do so knowingly and willingly because you all deserve to know who initiated the closing of D+D.

In fact, when I said you folks were "wrong" about who to blame in the instances that forced your forum to change, I did so because in most of those cases, it should have been me you were blaming, and not the Progs. I did so in a selfish and harsh manner. I have defended my actions by saying that I was "protecting the innocent." That was partly true, but really I was protecting the truly guilty, and that was because I was guilty. I chose a very poor manner to do this, and I hurt you all with my words. I apologize to you all. I'm truly sorry.

The end result is some peace, and it's nice to finally have that!

Yes, Trust. Now you have peace. At this moment, the current number of active reports made against members in the combined Adventist forums is Zero. This, I believe, is unprecedented. It is truly peace.

You really have yourselves to thank for the peace, as you have been quite focused during the processes that happened to around you. There were some behind-the-scenes discussions that may never know about. There were a lot of feathers ruffled.

I think you folks are well on your way to being able to finally enjoy your space. The progs have been "well trained" to understand your forum's rules, and your right to have those rules.

I hopefully had some part in that as well.

You see, I'm not against you. I'm working hard (mostly behind the scenes) to get some real changes made in a forum that was once thought to be a lost cause. By being assigned here, I was essentially "thrown to the wolves." I say that with no disrespect for the upper staff who recommended your area, nor to you and your family, but as a statement of fact. This forum was a war zone, and there have been many casualties along the way.

I didn't see my job as just "working the reports" and handing out infractions until there was nobody left. Granted, I have infracted some of the folks here, but no more than I have done so with the Progs.

I saw my job as taking active steps to be able to attain peace in this forum. I had to play some real hardball at times. Your staff found themselves at odds more than once. In the end, we pulled together and formed a unified front that still stands. I may have initiated some of the actions, but your staff has done an incredible amount of work behind the scenes. We have worked through our own problems to provide you with the best moderation that we are capable of. I cannot take credit for the peace that you now enjoy. You have gotten peace by being peaceful, and your staff has worked to provide you with some safety, to help ensure that your peace will continue to be manageable.

Along the way, I made a few enemies. I've said some things that I regret. I am truly sorry to those I've hurt along the path.

If given another chance, I'd choose my words far more carefully, to avoid hurting anyone. But, I'd do many of the same things that I did do. Things that did not make many members (or staff) happy.

My goal has always been peace for the SDAs. Nobody thought it was possible, but Zero reports? You can't argue with cold hard facts.

You now have peace. You have yourselves to thank, and the other members of your staff who kept their cool while I was doing little other than stirring up trouble.

I am going to stay on as a moderator for your forum and continue to protect and insure the peace (until I get booted out). I have never been one to back down from anything. I know that you folks don't like me because I have said some venomous words, and that I stir up trouble. I can't blame you.

But, I've learned a lot about showing respect, and I'm still learning. Hopefully, given time, I may be able to prove that my efforts are beneficial for your forum.

I'll try to be nicer.

In the end though, I'm not trying to win a popularity contest. I'm trying to fix that which needs fixing, and protect the rights of our members with every tactic I can muster.
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
Hi Trust,

I can understand that. Granted, I wasn't a part of this forum during the much of the "combined" days, but I saw enough heartache to realize what you're saying is very true. A lot of good people got hurt (in fact most, I think). Was it completely fruitless? I don't know. What counts now is going to be the future, and I believe that there is a very real chance at peace, now.

I agree, the future is what matters. I do wish you would've been around a little longer before you grouped a bunch of people in the "victim" category, but hey, everyone that had spent some time here (non-Adventist included) recognized this forum for what it was...antagonistic on both sides.

DeanM said:
Maybe they have forgotten. They certainly supported the split, for the most part. There were a couple of votes that we'll never know the origin of. On the whole, Trust, I believe that you are quite correct that most of them supported the split.

But, truth be told, I would remiss to not offer myself up for blame in this split. I was the one who who started the poll in WWMC. Granted, that poll never did do what it was intended to do, which was to give any adventist wishing to discuss subjects that deviated from the Statement of Faith, and do so in an area where they could still enact a modest set of exclusionary rules for themselves. -edit I meant in the WWMC, that never happened.

The poll may have had an overall effect towards the forum split (I think it did). It may not have (which I doubt). So, the Progs did what they could for a split, and I like to think that I have helped them.

Don't get me wrong, the split was a GOOD thing and I've always supported the idea. It wouldn't have worked if they had felt forced into it though, understandably, so you actually did us ALL a big favor....but the wording....oh man, the wording.

DeanM said:
So, there's probably good reason to blame me just as much as anybody else for what happened. I admit to using "overly sensational" language when I wrote that poll. I realize that my calling the Progs "persecuted" was a drastic overstatement, and had negative repercussions by showing the Trads in a bad light.

Blame isn't the right word Dean. I'm thankful to you for starting the ball rolling on something we all needed. It could've been done in a different manner and that was the only thing I took offense to.

DeanM said:
I'd like to apologize to each and every one of you who was hurt by my characterizations. I'm truly sorry that anyone was hurt by my actions.

70 X 7!! :) Thanks Dean, it means a lot to me.

DeanM said:
Perhaps. Some may say that you've all wrapped yourselves in a legal net of safety to "hide." What anybody else thinks is not your problem. The SDAs have often found themselves in a similar position throughout history. Other people have quite a lot to say that has been quite negative. Saying that you're "hiding" is among those things.

But, CF allows all communities the right to protect themselves. It is written as to not be argued against. Your rights are there for a reason, and I have defended your rights in this regard.

If by "hiding" you have found safe haven for your discussions, then I applaud you. You have exercised your rights, and done so in a polite and responsible manner, on the whole. Given the severity of your past situation, I think you all did quite well.

It was a necessity, and it's as simple as that. If the debate had been fruitful then I don't think any of us would've complained, because the truth is, I don't see too many of my Adventist friends that hide from debate. In fact, they seem to love it....ha! It went beyond debate though--it was an attempt to sway and people got really bad at hiding that toward the end.

That's the crux of it all. We aren't given the benefit of the doubt that we HAVE studied something out and just don't agree. I don't think there's been an argument on here yet that I haven't already considered, and that's the truth.

DeanM said:
I speak specifically at your restraint in the arena of cross-forum baiting. There's an announcement stickied at the top of the page about this, and it's there for a reason. The staff was starting to see a few shots fired across the boundaries of the forums, and we wanted it to stop.

That's actually ALWAYS been the problem. The belief is not usually what's attacked, but the person WITH the belief is. If people can't talk amongst themselves without constant debate, seriously, what is the point?

DeanM said:
Given the situation, I admit that this practice of CFB could have escalated into a real war. It did not. There were a few instances, but on the whole, I respect each and every one of the Trads for showing restraint.

It's just not necessary to CFB, in my opinion. The people I didn't relate with know that and they know why. To continue it after the split is just childish.

DeanM said:
The reason you altered your FSGs was well within your rights, and I will continue to support and defend your rights. You have not been told this, but the instigator that got D+D closed was very possibly me, as it was me that initiated the inspection of that forum. I did so because I saw that very few people were reading the FSGs, and violations were rampant. To me, the name of the forum was the problem. I pointed this out to upper staff as a possible cause of so many reports. To me, the average member would see "Debate" in the forum's name and go there to do just that.

I believe the wording I used was "report-mill."

While I was initiating a discussion among staff to find the best way to approach your community with the suggestion of altering the name of the forum, your old FSGs were found to be inadequate, and your forum was closed while new FSGs were decided upon.

You're not telling us anything we didn't already know Dean. Staff aren't the only people that talk behind the scenes. ;)

The REASON you did it is what is questionnable...because your "friends" and the ones you took it upon yourself to defend were the ones getting reported.

Stop for two seconds and realize why they were being reported though. It was continued harassment and bullying. I think you're getting a glimpse of that now, so I understand where the apology is coming from.

You live and you learn, but we sure could've spared you the trouble a long time ago.

DeanM said:
I am violating my contract with CF to not disclose staff actions. I do so knowingly and willingly because you all deserve to know who initiated the closing of D+D.

Then YOU'RE FIRED! :)

We knew exactly why it got closed down, so again, you're not telling us anything we didn't already know. It was a direct result of WHO was getting reported and that's what we said all along, and you told us we were wrong.

DeanM said:
In fact, when I said you folks were "wrong" about who to blame in the instances that forced your forum to change, I did so because in most of those cases, it should have been me you were blaming, and not the Progs. I did so in a selfish and harsh manner. I have defended my actions by saying that I was "protecting the innocent." That was partly true, but really I was protecting the truly guilty, and that was because I was guilty. I chose a very poor manner to do this, and I hurt you all with my words. I apologize to you all. I'm truly sorry.

I appreciate the apology, again, but you gotta expect a little kickback on this one (not that you're not forgiven). You were dishonest with us, and we knew you were, so you do have to appreciate why it is that we don't respect you as a moderator right now. I'm willing to give you another chance, and I'm sure my friends here would agree...but Dean, are you promising us that it's done? Your job as our moderator is to protect us too, and up until now you certainly haven't done that.

Don't make us have to report harsh words over "there" to do something about it. We don't want to do that. We really do just want some peace here, even if there are people foaming at the mouth to get back over here and have the "let me at 'em" mentality.

Fellowship is highly overrated for some people. They don't want to fellowship if it means the person they're talking to won't ever change their beliefs, and that's when it gets truly sad. I don't think I'm telling you anything you haven't already realized for yourself though, and I think that's what spirred this post from you (which I really do appreciate).

DeanM said:
Yes, Trust. Now you have peace. At this moment, the current number of active reports made against members in the combined Adventist forums is Zero. This, I believe, is unprecedented. It is truly peace.

You really have yourselves to thank for the peace, as you have been quite focused during the processes that happened to around you. There were some behind-the-scenes discussions that may never know about. There were a lot of feathers ruffled.

I think you folks are well on your way to being able to finally enjoy your space. The progs have been "well trained" to understand your forum's rules, and your right to have those rules.

I hopefully had some part in that as well.

You see, I'm not against you. I'm working hard (mostly behind the scenes) to get some real changes made in a forum that was once thought to be a lost cause. By being assigned here, I was essentially "thrown to the wolves." I say that with no disrespect for the upper staff who recommended your area, nor to you and your family, but as a statement of fact. This forum was a war zone, and there have been many casualties along the way.

I didn't see my job as just "working the reports" and handing out infractions until there was nobody left. Granted, I have infracted some of the folks here, but no more than I have done so with the Progs.

I saw my job as taking active steps to be able to attain peace in this forum. I had to play some real hardball at times. Your staff found themselves at odds more than once. In the end, we pulled together and formed a unified front that still stands. I may have initiated some of the actions, but your staff has done an incredible amount of work behind the scenes. We have worked through our own problems to provide you with the best moderation that we are capable of. I cannot take credit for the peace that you now enjoy. You have gotten peace by being peaceful, and your staff has worked to provide you with some safety, to help ensure that your peace will continue to be manageable.

Along the way, I made a few enemies. I've said some things that I regret. I am truly sorry to those I've hurt along the path.

If given another chance, I'd choose my words far more carefully, to avoid hurting anyone. But, I'd do many of the same things that I did do. Things that did not make many members (or staff) happy.

My goal has always been peace for the SDAs. Nobody thought it was possible, but Zero reports? You can't argue with cold hard facts.

I have never felt the need to report someone in their own "home". Not that there wasn't some definite flaming going on over there the day I decided to have a gander...but they deserve peace as much as we do.

DeanM said:
You now have peace. You have yourselves to thank, and the other members of your staff who kept their cool while I was doing little other than stirring up trouble.

I don't envy the jobs of moderators. I imagine you guys feel unappreciated from all angles sometimes.

If you disrespect our peeps (mods) though, I don't think you'll be around too long. Give 'em a chance Dean. Doc, Red, Daryl....three of the finest men God ever created. If you fight with them, then you'd fight with anybody. HA!

DeanM said:
I am going to stay on as a moderator for your forum and continue to protect and insure the peace (until I get booted out). I have never been one to back down from anything. I know that you folks don't like me because I have said some venomous words, and that I stir up trouble. I can't blame you.

But, I've learned a lot about showing respect, and I'm still learning. Hopefully, given time, I may be able to prove that my efforts are beneficial for your forum.

I'll try to be nicer.

In the end though, I'm not trying to win a popularity contest. I'm trying to fix that which needs fixing, and protect the rights of our members with every tactic I can muster.

"I'll try to be nicer" ain't gonna cut it. Can you PROMISE us that you won't make further actions here in an effort to make it more comfortable for the people making US uncomfortable?

That's what I want to know.

This whole thing has been a lot like moving into a new house. The moving is horrific and getting settled is terribly time-consuming, but the end result is beautiful and worth the effort.
 
Upvote 0

DeanM

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2007
3,633
402
60
✟5,870.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I can make no promises, Trust. I can only try my best.

Ironically, the same "bias" that I have been accused of here has also occurred among the Progs. They see me (sometimes) as facilitating unfair rules that will prohibit them from teaching you all the errors that they see in your beliefs.

In the end, I'm nobody's friend on either side. You can read my posts in their forum and see that I am treated very suspiciously and my thoughts are often referred to as supportive of thought policing.

Nobody needs to like me, though. Again I'm not here to win any popularity contest. I'm here to take actions toward peace that was once though impossible.

This has made me be perceived as a "Friend to the other side" on both sides.

Ultimately, you have peace now. If I ended up alieanating myself in the process, then that's a casualty I'm just going to have to live with.

You can continue to view me in a negative light if you like. I have thick skin. I've made my apologies. I did so because I think you all deserve it.

But, my job is to keep the peace in CF. Frankly, I'll keep on doing what I do, which is getting results, and I'll do so without ever being accepted as a friend by either the Trads or the Progs.

While both camps are addressing their issues with me, at least you're not at eachother's throats any more.

Peace, with one casualty. Me.

It's a trade that I'd make again and again.
 
Upvote 0

honorthesabbath

Senior Veteran
Aug 10, 2005
4,067
78
76
Arkansas
✟27,180.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Dean--I would like a clarification if I might. When you first appeared you posted in the prog area that you had 'volunteered' to become their mod; THEIR mod--not the trad mod since we had enough mods already.

Now you state that you were 'recruited' by an admin. Would that be the same admin that you stated 'directed' your modding 'strategies'?

So can you clear up this discrepancy please?

Thank you for your apologies, but remember, once trust is violated, it's almost impossible to get it back.
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
85
San Marcos, CA
✟70,664.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Dean,

You have had much to say both in this thread and what has led up to it. You have said your piece in open forum and with the protection of staff confidentiality as have other staff members. Fortunately or unfortunately, depending on one's viewpoint, I've been physically unable to use the computer for over a week and haven't said a single word for at least that long in open forum or in closed discussions. I have been accused of things of which I am not guilty. Has any of this gotten through my "thick tough hyde?" No! I've got the toughest hyde/skin of anyone on these boards. There is no one here that can get to me personaly. Am I upset Yes! Why am I upset then you ask? To put it very simply the truth has been attacked and members have been hurt by those that had this as their agenda from the start.

When I can put the time necessary into drafting a response to what you have written here I will post it here for all to read for themselves. I will also draft a response for staff and the closed discussions.

Respectfully,
Doc

Everyone must climb fool's hill. Some just stay on top much longer than others.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,331
19,834
USA
✟2,080,573.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
We've been real busy for the last 48 hours and will be through the upcoming uipgrade.

did you see this announcement?
 
Upvote 0

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
85
San Marcos, CA
✟70,664.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Yes Free,

I have indeed seen the anouncement and ALL the FINE PRINT conecteted with it, eventhough it's not all in one place. Erasing these threads and post will not let any of the questions ask go without response, or the promised rebuttle go unposted. Nor will it exponge the record of past activitity.

Doc
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,331
19,834
USA
✟2,080,573.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Dean--I would like a clarification if I might. When you first appeared you posted in the prog area that you had 'volunteered' to become their mod; THEIR mod--not the trad mod since we had enough mods already.

Now you state that you were 'recruited' by an admin. Would that be the same admin that you stated 'directed' your modding 'strategies'?

So can you clear up this discrepancy please?

Thank you for your apologies, but remember, once trust is violated, it's almost impossible to get it back.
I think you may be misunderstanding something. All of us who were mods of the Progressive area when it was combined with this one were asked if we would be mods of the new P/M/F fourm. The request was pm'd to us and had the names of all our admins on it - like CaDan, Tishri1, Athene, BBAS 64, CelticGrace, et al. No one was asked to pick one or the other.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,331
19,834
USA
✟2,080,573.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
?? - did you get your answer then from Dean?
I read through what Dean wrote and then read your question and it doesn't make much sense to me.
 
Upvote 0

DeanM

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2007
3,633
402
60
✟5,870.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Clarification- I PMed Honor with an answer, rather than post it here. It's getting off topic. This is supposed to be a thread to thank the Trad/Ads who kept their cool during the recent changes.

I also added a few comments of my role in those changes.

Discussion of my placement as a moderator in multiple forums is beyond the scope of the discussion here, but FreeinChrist is accurate in her statement about how the mods were asked to volunteer in the Prog area, which is the same explanation that I PMed to Honor.
 
Upvote 0