Neither did I. And to boot, I answered your question. Again, you picked the wrong arena then 
You might want to try your fancy poetry tricks in another forum area?
Knock, knock..
Again, one more time, you could put any requirement you like on it, it does not concern me, I was here to 'only' present my offer. Which you were free to accept, or refuse a long time ago. Instead you dragged it out until I had to say, if you do not answer the question I'm going to have to assume you rejected my offer and took the blue pill. At which time you reluctantly answered the question, getting it part right, and part wrong. Then in your very next post, 'circular' back to your requirements, keeping your endless debate going
(which I have no interest, nor has it anything to do with my offer).
And to answer this statement of yours, "
'True prophecy' does not need for me to first perform 'baby steps'" - Truly, for everyone it does
(even Christ grew in wisdom), where 'you're not willing' to go..
One of the
(obvious) ways to the Knowledge of the invisible God is by prophecy and fulfillment in our day, or as you would have it, a '
Lotto winning psychic', even though you have stated elsewhere..
"
if the Bible got something right, how do we know this was foreknowledge from your asserted God?"
..and..
"
Reading the Bible to prove the Bible is about as circular as one can get. Honestly, it would be no different then reading a 66 chapter, 40 person authored 'Big Book of Science, 2000 years ago by the 'established scientific high council' of the time period, which is never later allowed to be updated or modified, to confer all absolute answers, while also without confirming outside this one and only book"
..showing flawed, and biased logic.
Which such logic would also produce "Going to a Lotto winning psychic to prove a Lotto winning psychic is about as circular as one can get." Though you also stated that such a psychic you would
"
<have to acknowledge> that something 'beyond' does then truly exist."
You say for yourself, scripture is hard to understand, vague, and open to interpretation
(but this I would agree, many denominations/nondenominational, something be wrong).
You won't except anybodies word of a prophecy of fulfillment who claim, God spoke in His word, yet, you just want me to tell you.
Knowing under the restraints of your requirements which you have laid down..
1) you would not simply except my word on it's own
(leading, or forcing a debate).
2) That this would then require effort on your part, to look into them with help
(because their vague, requiring aid), that you may understand them for yourself, yet..
You refuse to put in the effort, relying on someone else to tell you, at which you would not except, anyway
(forcing a debate), knowing you would have to see and understand them for yourself
(not requiring a debate).
You needlessly prolong a useless, and unnecessary debate, which to my offer only required a Yes, or a No, to end it all.
You were against going though the scriptures, to Know and understand them for yourself.
You refused the help that you received, that you may understand them.
You remain in you circular state, and refuse to get out.
And you blame God for this!?
Saying, 'It's not my fault I don't believe!'
Any seed thrown would bounce off and land wayside.
God justified, you took the blue pill
(even before I came along)!
To both reasons as to why I was in this thread, finished, and accomplished.
If you will not, and "God won't," then neither will I.
