His_disciple3
Newbie
- Nov 22, 2010
- 1,680
- 33
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
ok let's see if I got this right, you can accuse me of being in a cultand accuse me of worshipping a dead King. so I guess by your own standard, you lost "ALL" my creditiblity by insulting me long ago. I'm just glad you finally realize it . still prayingStep two of the defense of the KJVO cultish belief, ad hominen attacks. Do you not realize that one looses all credibility by insulting the opponent? This is the typical argument fallacy designed to shift ones inability to defend their premise by drawing attention away from themselves and unto the opponent's character. Pitiful.
I justify the originals as being the inspired word of God. I do not justify, nor is there any evidence to justify, a translation separated by over 1500 years from the originals as being the "English" inerrant word of God. Paul tells us that ALL scripture is profitable not just the KJV.
The Latin word Lucifer is not a modern word but one used by Jerome while translating the Vulgate during the 4th century, almost 1200 years prior to the KJV.
this is your quote:
so some reading on the historical accounts of King James before you continue to deitize him.
Last edited:
Upvote
0