• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Kill vs. Murder

MrJim

Legend 3/17/05
Mar 17, 2005
16,491
1,369
FEMA Region III
✟59,025.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
this will serve as answer to Jim as well...

Nadiine's point was correct. There are two issues here, first is the use of force, second is the level of force to be used, or more specifically is lethal force justified.

First dealing with Lethal force. Lethal force is ONLY justified in the case of defending your life or the life of another. This is of course speaking of private citizens. With governments its another issue.

Thus Arizona is quite correct to make it illegal for you to shoot a guy who is leaving your house with your TV. The key there is that he is leaving. If a burglar is LEAVING then he is no longer a reasonable threat to your life/person. Thus you are not justified in using lethal force.

This is the issue where home owners have commonly gotten in trouble when defending their property against a burglar. They shoot a guy who is either leaving, or has already left their house. At that point he is no longer a threat and they do not have the right to use lethal force. Thus the burglar, if he survives, sues them and wins.

You do have a right to use force to protect your property, but only proportional to that which is being used upon you. Thus if a person is stealing your TV, you have a right to tackle him and subdue him, and at least in my state you have the right to put him under citizens arrest because he is actively committing a felony.

The law usually recognizes a scale of force and catagorizes certain actions at various levels. For example, some one hitting you in the chest or stomach is not considered lethal force.. but someone hitting you in the head MIGHT be. IF someone is using a weapon such as a knife, crowbar, or baseball bat.. that is lethal force. Guns obviously are as well.

Also you don't have a right to kill someone just for being in your home, even if they aren't leaving. If you come upon a burglar, you can't use lethal force until he shows signs or attempts to use force on you. Thus if you come out with a gun and the guy freezes, you can't shoot him. This is one of the reasons that deadly booby traps are illegal. You can't use lethal force just because someone is intruding on your property.

Those are all 'legal' standards, but they are based on historical precedents and legal theory, which in turn is based primarily off the biblical standard.

I was just asking for NT teaching of use of deadly force to protect my stuff...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Communion
Upvote 0