• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Kalam and Free Will

cutupmaster

Member
Jan 22, 2008
5
1
✟22,630.00
Faith
Atheist
The KCA is suppose to establish the existence of a being who freely chose to create the universe into existence. Below, I argue that such a "free" being is precluded if we accept the first premise of the KCA.
1. God created the universe by the act of freely willing it into existence (FWUE) - i.e. he freely chose to bring about an effect without antecedent determining conditions. [Craig's assumption]
2. The act of FWUE either began to exist or it didn't. [premise]
-------------------------------------
i. If the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist, then the act either (a) always existed or (b) it didn't exist at all. [premise]
ii. If (b) is the case--the act of FWUE didn't exist at all-- then (1) is false. [claim]
iii. Therefore, if the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist, then (b) cannot be the case. (from ii)
iv. If the act of FWUE always existed, then our universe is always being created, which is absurd. [claim]
v. Therefore, if the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist, then (a) cannot be the case. (from iv)
vi. Therefore, since neither (b) nor (a) are the case, then it is false that the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist. (from i, iii, v)
--------------------------------------------
3. Therefore, the act of FWUE began to exist. (from vi)
4. The first premise of the KCA states: Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence (where 'cause' is understood as the sufficent determining factor that brings the thing which began to exist into existence). [premise]
5. Therefore, if the first premise of the KCA is true, then the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. (from 3, 4)
6. The cause of the act of FWUE either began to exist or it didn't.
7. [repeat arguments i-vi on 6].
8. Therefore, the cause of the act of FWUE began to exist.
9. Therefore, the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. (from 4, 8)
10. Therefore, the cause of the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. [repeat 6 and 7]
11. Therefore, the cause of the cause of the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. [repeat 6, 7]
12. Ad infinitum... [repeat 6, 7]
13. Therefore, (1) is false: God's willing the universe into existence wasn't free. (from 5-12)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lord Emsworth

cutupmaster

Member
Jan 22, 2008
5
1
✟22,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Here's a parallel argument, which aims at the incomaptibility between libertarian free will and the KCA more generally.

1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence (where 'cause' is understood as the sufficent determining factor which brings the effect into existence). [Kalam premise]
2. An ultimate cause is that which produces an effect but is itself uncaused.
3. If libertarian free will is true, then my choosing to do A (if it's free) is an ultimate cause.
4. My choosing to do A began to exist.
5. Therefore, if (1) is true, then my choosing to do A must have a cause of its existence.
6. However, if libertarian free will is true, then my choosing to do A must be uncaused.
7. Therefore, (1) excludes libertarian free will.
 
Upvote 0
N

Nathan45

Guest
Here's a parallel argument, which aims at the incomaptibility between libertarian free will and the KCA more generally.

1. Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence (where 'cause' is understood as the sufficent determining factor which brings the effect into existence). [Kalam premise]
2. An ultimate cause is that which produces an effect but is itself uncaused.
3. If libertarian free will is true, then my choosing to do A (if it's free) is an ultimate cause.
4. My choosing to do A began to exist.
5. Therefore, if (1) is true, then my choosing to do A must have a cause of its existence.
6. However, if libertarian free will is true, then my choosing to do A must be uncaused.
7. Therefore, (1) excludes libertarian free will.

Translating this into english:

If free will exists, then our own arbitrary decisions are an uncaused cause. Interesting observation.

And this conflicts with some philosophy that posits that all uncaused causes always existed.
 
Upvote 0

elman

elman
Dec 19, 2003
28,949
451
85
Texas
✟54,197.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
The KCA is suppose to establish the existence of a being who freely chose to create the universe into existence. Below, I argue that such a "free" being is precluded if we accept the first premise of the KCA.
1. God created the universe by the act of freely willing it into existence (FWUE) - i.e. he freely chose to bring about an effect without antecedent determining conditions. [Craig's assumption]
2. The act of FWUE either began to exist or it didn't. [premise]
-------------------------------------
i. If the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist, then the act either (a) always existed or (b) it didn't exist at all. [premise]
ii. If (b) is the case--the act of FWUE didn't exist at all-- then (1) is false. [claim]
iii. Therefore, if the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist, then (b) cannot be the case. (from ii)
iv. If the act of FWUE always existed, then our universe is always being created, which is absurd. [claim]
v. Therefore, if the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist, then (a) cannot be the case. (from iv)
vi. Therefore, since neither (b) nor (a) are the case, then it is false that the act of FWUE didn't begin to exist. (from i, iii, v)
--------------------------------------------
3. Therefore, the act of FWUE began to exist. (from vi)
4. The first premise of the KCA states: Everything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence (where 'cause' is understood as the sufficent determining factor that brings the thing which began to exist into existence). [premise]
5. Therefore, if the first premise of the KCA is true, then the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. (from 3, 4)
6. The cause of the act of FWUE either began to exist or it didn't.
7. [repeat arguments i-vi on 6].
8. Therefore, the cause of the act of FWUE began to exist.
9. Therefore, the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. (from 4, 8)
10. Therefore, the cause of the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. [repeat 6 and 7]
11. Therefore, the cause of the cause of the act of FWUE has a cause of its existence. [repeat 6, 7]
12. Ad infinitum... [repeat 6, 7]
13. Therefore, (1) is false: God's willing the universe into existence wasn't free. (from 5-12)
There are always many causes, not just one.
 
Upvote 0