Junk DNA not refuted.

[SLP]

Here are the publications of souljah's preferred expert:

**********************************************
Hagg GM, Suurkula J.

Zero crossing rate of electromyograms during occupational work and endurance tests as predictors for work related myalgia in the shoulder/neck region.
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1991;62(6):436-44.
*****************************************************

Suurkula J, Hagg GM.

Relations between shoulder/neck disorders and EMG zero crossing shifts in female assembly workers using the test contraction method.
Ergonomics. 1987 Nov;30(11):1553-64.
******************************************************
Hagg GM, Suurkula J, Liew M. Related Articles

A worksite method for shoulder muscle fatigue measurements using EMG, test contractions and zero crossing technique.
Ergonomics. 1987 Nov;30(11):1541-51.
******************************************************

Hagvall K, Suurkula J.
[Geriatric day care--experiences from a 3 year study]
Lakartidningen. 1975 Mar 12;72(11):1091-4, 1097. Swedish.
*****************************************************


One - even a layman - can see that this MD has no relevant publications (and therefore has no relevant expertise) in genetics.

 

[Chris†opher Paul]

Thats why he himself cited 700 studies by experts backing up his position.

 

[Morat]

Morat,
You're evolving AD&D characters? ROFLMAO..... now that should go over well on a christian forum.

  Just melee types, at the moment. I'm looking for any...interesting..combinations of classes and prestige classes, and GA's weed out the unsuccessful. Mage-types and ranged (as well as mixes) come later. You can simply the combat (and tactics) of a melee fighter...

 

 

[SLP]

Originally posted by s0uljah
Thats why he himself cited 700 studies by experts backing up his position.

But according to creationist lawyer Phil Johnson, he is just naother layman. One layman preferring another layman's take on an issue is...
well... what we usually see in creationist circles....

 

[RufusAtticus]

Originally posted by s0uljah
Thats why he himself cited 700 studies by experts backing up his position.

Souljah,

It doesn't matter how many studies that he cited. It is an internet article and not part of the peer-reviewed scientific literature. This is supposed to be a discussion about scientific literature, not internet articles. If those 700 studies support him so well, then surely you can go to a library and pick one or two of the 700 and use them to rebut me. You can't use secondary literature when we are already discussing primary literature.