OK so my thought is, If someone is Gay,or had an abortion, or is engaging in sexual relations with someone and they are not married. Or if you lie, or steal, or cheat someone, or smoke, or drink, or get a tattoo, or curse. Aren't they all the same? In the lines of sin i mean. Isn't a sin a sin. So shouldn't real Christians not be judgemental or shouldn't they not condemn someone who is in a sense in the same amount of sin? Like my friend who is gay, yet goes to church and believes in God, shouldn't i embrace him? Because we all know i have sinned. I am not better then he is. He is no better then me.
Of course you should embrace him.
By why would embracing him mean embracing his vices?
If you mean embracing him as justifying his behavior, then no, because you are not truly embracing this person.
For instance I can embrace someone who is committing adultery, but In no way would I justify what he is doing. If I do, then I'm not following the Gospel.
Many people read the "judge not, lest ye be judged", but tend to forgot the rest of the verse which says:
You hypocrite! First remove the beam from your own eye, and then you will see clearly enough to remove the speck from your brother's eye." - Matthew 7:5
So Jesus not not telling us to never Judge, as that would be impossible(nearly all the posts on this forum, from Christian and non-Christian are types of judgments). People who have correct teaching and knowledge can judge in certain matters of the flock. Otherwise the apostles would never have appointed bishops in areas of the Holy See(Polycarp, Clement of Rome, Linus, Igantius, Evaristus, Papias, Cletus, etc) if they did not see fit that they could judge correctly in matters and oversee the flock.
I myself an currently reading Eusebius's Church History(
Historia Ecclesiae) and the apostles put in GREAT efforts to put in overseers and bishops to judge and correct the flock, as well as fight heresies. The apostles would not have done this unless they saw certain followers in Christ to judge correctly in things.