Wave3Girl said:
This is coming from my dad:
He was a SeaBee in the United States Navy for 22 years. He worked along side marines, dressed like marines. You think because you are going to be a marine that you won't have to go to sea, but marines go to sea just as much as the navy does. But the navy men have a job to do at sea, while the marines are pretty much confined to doing nothing while at sea. (of course eating, sleeping, and shining their guns) The navy you sleep in 3 and 5 star hotels most the time on shore, however the marines sleep on cots and in sleeping bags practically all the time. The navy eats 3 and 4 course meals when the marines eat a ready-made Bag of Food. You throw them an orange and it is seen as a delicasy. Marines are sharp and they know their job, a marine can stand in 30 minutes and teach me about his gun or bazooka and i'll know it up and down...where as a most sailors couldn't do this.
1. Not all Marines do sea duty.
2. When they do, they don't just "do nothing...eat sleep and shine their guns" (by the way, if your dad was a seabee, then he should know that Marines don't carry guns, they carry rifles. Guns are artillary.)
When Marines do sea duty, they have
duties to carry out.
3. Onboard, Marines are
not restricted from mess priviledges.
4. Marines do not sleep on cots and sleeping bags unless they're in the field and I've never met a sailor who wouldn't fall over laughing at the thought of being put up in a five star hotel.
Granted, the accomodations at "The Island" and San Diego are a little spartan
but you're not there for a vacation, you're there to become a Marine. If you want a place where they put little mints on your pillow in the morning, join the Air Force.
Otherwise, accomodations are pretty much the same as you'll find in civilian life.
We are fighting a war right now where we were lied to.
Really? What was the lie?
My brother and me both are retired from the navy.
And yet, you completely botched your description of a Marine's sea duty.
We knew that their were no weapons of mass destruction and the president is just mad cause they tried to kill his daddy.
1. If there were no weapons of mass destruction they why...
a. ...were Iraqi forces wearing chem suits when we invaded?
b. ...didn't Saddam allow the UN access? It would seem that the easiest way to have prevented a war and keep himself in power would be to have just allowed UN inspectors in to see for themselves that there are no WMDs.
c. ...couldn't he account for the weapons that he
did have that he was supposed to have destroyed?
d. ...was he working on delivery systems to carry WMDs that he "didn't have"?
e. ...was sarin gas and Botulinum toxin found and one Iraqi scientist who testified that he was asked to hide strains of anthrax?
Do you understand the reasons we went to war?
a. WMDs
b. Iraqi violation of UN1441
c. Hostile acts on the part of Iraq toward UN and US planes
d. violation of the peace treaty that ended the first round of the Gulf War
WMDs are only one reason we went. If WMD are found not to exsist (and simple logic tells us that they
do exist), this does not negate the other three reasons.
Second, as for the fact that we went to war because they "tried to kill his daddy", did you know that assaination or attempted assasination of the president is an act of war?
Did you know that the assasination of Archduke Ferdinand in 1914 was one of the causes of WW1? Do you think, therefore, that we shouldn't have fought in that fight to protect Europe?
The marines have to endure extense mental abuse. They break you down and build you back up.
Could you please give us an example of "extense mental abuse"? Did you know that DIs are closely monitored and that any Marine or Boot can go at anytime of the day or night to report abuse without fear of reprisal?
As far as the "break you down and build you back up" garbage, isn't it interesting that the only time I hear that is from people who aren't Marines?
The truth is, they don't break you down, they take all of your best qualities and build them up, while eliminating your bad ones.
Since you suggested that Amadeus look into the Navy, does the Navy employ such abuse in their training (think carefully before you answer)?