Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
John Durham concludes FBI should NOT have investigated Trump
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="childeye 2" data-source="post: 77269889" data-attributes="member: 412375"><p>Respectfully, you're mistaken. "Significant" is not coming word for word from the FBI's own operations guide, the DIOG, nor the AGG. Sections IV.A.3.b and c. are references to sections in the Durham report itself.</p><p></p><p>The term "significant' is an adjective descriptive of something as noteworthy or meaningful. It's therefore relative and arbitrary, meaning it is subjective, not definitive. </p><p></p><p>In this application it is clearly a chosen word by Durham to describe his subjective opinion of what he calls the FBI's "review" of the FBI intelligence database. And in Durham's mind, the "review" which supposedly is pursuant to evaluating the raw intelligence should pertain to, and I quote, "information about Trump being involved with Russian leadership officials", even though the raw information is not even indicative of Trump being involved with any Russian leadership officials, nor does the EC describe any intention to determine if Trump is involved with Russian leadership officials.</p><p></p><p>I'm just stating the facts concerning the situation the FBI was already in (see Horowitz). They were already investigating Russian infiltration of the DNC servers and the leaking of stolen documents. As shown below, the EC is referencing those <u>Russian activities</u> happening at the time, and there is no question these activities relate to the investigating of Russian interference in the election.</p><p></p><p>The EC: "to determine whether individual(s) associated with the Trump campaign [were] witting of and/or coordinating <u>activities with the Government of Russia. "</u></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="childeye 2, post: 77269889, member: 412375"] Respectfully, you're mistaken. "Significant" is not coming word for word from the FBI's own operations guide, the DIOG, nor the AGG. Sections IV.A.3.b and c. are references to sections in the Durham report itself. The term "significant' is an adjective descriptive of something as noteworthy or meaningful. It's therefore relative and arbitrary, meaning it is subjective, not definitive. In this application it is clearly a chosen word by Durham to describe his subjective opinion of what he calls the FBI's "review" of the FBI intelligence database. And in Durham's mind, the "review" which supposedly is pursuant to evaluating the raw intelligence should pertain to, and I quote, "information about Trump being involved with Russian leadership officials", even though the raw information is not even indicative of Trump being involved with any Russian leadership officials, nor does the EC describe any intention to determine if Trump is involved with Russian leadership officials. I'm just stating the facts concerning the situation the FBI was already in (see Horowitz). They were already investigating Russian infiltration of the DNC servers and the leaking of stolen documents. As shown below, the EC is referencing those [U]Russian activities[/U] happening at the time, and there is no question these activities relate to the investigating of Russian interference in the election. The EC: "to determine whether individual(s) associated with the Trump campaign [were] witting of and/or coordinating [U]activities with the Government of Russia. "[/U] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
John Durham concludes FBI should NOT have investigated Trump
Top
Bottom