Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
John Durham concludes FBI should NOT have investigated Trump
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ana the Ist" data-source="post: 77263363" data-attributes="member: 302807"><p>Again, everyone suspected Russia. It was all over the news. If everyone in the media is saying it was Russia, there's nothing about the timeline that helps your argument. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Of course it matters.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You have access to his sealed testimony?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Don Jr was also in the bar with the Australians and Papadopoulos?</p><p></p><p>This bar get more crowded by the minute.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>According to the Australians. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Corroborated by what? The media was saying that the Russians were being the hacking in Hillary's campaign. What does an Australian saying he heard something similar in a London bar "corroborate"?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Right and so did the media as a result.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Did he? I heard the account from the FBI was different. What did he lie about then?</p><p></p><p>Also, don't quote the report unless you are linking the relevant section. I don't trust anyone claiming factual evidence that isn't linking that factual evidence. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Now it's "if" it's contemporaneous. You didn't read the report did you?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're saying that the FBI got the info on the 16th? </p><p></p><p>Or are you saying they got the info later after the dump and it was labeled as if it were written May 16th?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It alleges he said that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually until it's corroborated, it's not evidence of anything. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There you go....I cut out the parts that seem to be distracting you.</p><p></p><p>After all, if you claim they weren't alleging a crime....there wouldn't be any reason to open a full investigation on the Trump campaign. That would be....extremely corrupt. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Australians?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And turned up nothing criminal by Trump’s team.....with the exception of not cooperating with an investigation that shouldn't have happened. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's remarkable, so the Australians hadn't even alleged a crime by Papadopoulos but the FBI opened an entire criminal investigation into the Trump campaign based on their words?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ana the Ist, post: 77263363, member: 302807"] Again, everyone suspected Russia. It was all over the news. If everyone in the media is saying it was Russia, there's nothing about the timeline that helps your argument. Of course it matters. You have access to his sealed testimony? Don Jr was also in the bar with the Australians and Papadopoulos? This bar get more crowded by the minute. According to the Australians. Corroborated by what? The media was saying that the Russians were being the hacking in Hillary's campaign. What does an Australian saying he heard something similar in a London bar "corroborate"? Right and so did the media as a result. Did he? I heard the account from the FBI was different. What did he lie about then? Also, don't quote the report unless you are linking the relevant section. I don't trust anyone claiming factual evidence that isn't linking that factual evidence. And? Now it's "if" it's contemporaneous. You didn't read the report did you? You're saying that the FBI got the info on the 16th? Or are you saying they got the info later after the dump and it was labeled as if it were written May 16th? It alleges he said that. Ok. Actually until it's corroborated, it's not evidence of anything. There you go....I cut out the parts that seem to be distracting you. After all, if you claim they weren't alleging a crime....there wouldn't be any reason to open a full investigation on the Trump campaign. That would be....extremely corrupt. Australians? And turned up nothing criminal by Trump’s team.....with the exception of not cooperating with an investigation that shouldn't have happened. That's remarkable, so the Australians hadn't even alleged a crime by Papadopoulos but the FBI opened an entire criminal investigation into the Trump campaign based on their words? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
John Durham concludes FBI should NOT have investigated Trump
Top
Bottom