Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
John Durham concludes FBI should NOT have investigated Trump
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="childeye 2" data-source="post: 77244183" data-attributes="member: 412375"><p>My point is that the IG was correct in his criticism; The FBI should have acted quickly rather than drag it out, so as to not leave people wondering and guessing about what will be found on Anthony Wieners laptop in the midst of a campaign.</p><p></p><p>It was a counter-intelligence investigation "to determine whether individual(s) associated with the Trump campaign [were] witting of and/or coordinating activities with the Government of Russia", and also it was opened as a SIM (sensitive investigative matter). The Russians would therefore need to be kept unaware of it and so would the public.</p><p></p><p>No. I'm claiming the public was not informed about crossfire hurricane which began on July 31, 2016. The public announcement that it was Russia that hacked the DNC came on June 14, 2016, when Crowd strike published its forensic report.</p><p></p><p>I'm just stating the facts according to the reports.</p><p></p><p>The public was aware the FBI had been investigating what they had reason to believe was Russian hacking of the White house, the state department, and the joint chiefs of staff beginning in 2014. The DNC was alerted to an intrusion by the FBI in mid 2015.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know if he ever worked in the OIG.</p><p></p><p>Yes, I am aware, thanks for asking. That doesn't change the fact that crossfire hurricane was never announced to the public and Wiener's laptop was, which created the logical fallacy in Durham's report that revealed his bias.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="childeye 2, post: 77244183, member: 412375"] My point is that the IG was correct in his criticism; The FBI should have acted quickly rather than drag it out, so as to not leave people wondering and guessing about what will be found on Anthony Wieners laptop in the midst of a campaign. It was a counter-intelligence investigation "to determine whether individual(s) associated with the Trump campaign [were] witting of and/or coordinating activities with the Government of Russia", and also it was opened as a SIM (sensitive investigative matter). The Russians would therefore need to be kept unaware of it and so would the public. No. I'm claiming the public was not informed about crossfire hurricane which began on July 31, 2016. The public announcement that it was Russia that hacked the DNC came on June 14, 2016, when Crowd strike published its forensic report. I'm just stating the facts according to the reports. The public was aware the FBI had been investigating what they had reason to believe was Russian hacking of the White house, the state department, and the joint chiefs of staff beginning in 2014. The DNC was alerted to an intrusion by the FBI in mid 2015. I don't know if he ever worked in the OIG. Yes, I am aware, thanks for asking. That doesn't change the fact that crossfire hurricane was never announced to the public and Wiener's laptop was, which created the logical fallacy in Durham's report that revealed his bias. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
John Durham concludes FBI should NOT have investigated Trump
Top
Bottom