• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

John 3:7

Lik3

Newbie
Nov 21, 2011
2,809
411
South Carolina
✟109,581.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
John 3:7
" You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You must be born again.’"

I have asked before are there different definitions of the "once saved, always saved" doctrine. Could differing denominations have differing beliefs on what it means to be born again? Do Catholics truly define, for example, differ on who is or isn't born again from Baptists? Are there different modes of a person being born again? I admit to not being an expert on Catholicism, but why don't many Protestants believe that Catholics aren't truly born again? Is it about the mode of baptism and confirmation or is it something else? Why also, did Jesus tell Nicodemus that he should not be surprised about Jesus' teaching on being born again? Is it because Nicodemus was a Pharisee and that salvation is from the Jews? Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Jesus initially preach to save the Jewish people first and foremost because He is/was their Messiah?
 
Last edited:

Shempster

ImJustMe
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2014
1,561
788
✟303,941.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Some say that Nicodemus should not have been surprised because people at that time believed in a sort of reincarnation. Not like the Hindus say, but within the human race only.
I have done extensive research into the subject. It appears that much of the documentation mentioning that people did in fact believe in it was likely erased from the books several years after Justinian made it an anathema in 553.
So from that perspective, Jesus may have been saying that we MUST die, but afterwards we can expect to become alive or reincarnate again. I mean think about it.... if we physically die then we are raised up with a NEW BODY, well isn't that what reincarnation is? Isn't that notion a major Christian tenet?

Now I am not claiming this to be true because I don't know. Only that it is a possible explanation.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Lik3
Upvote 0