JK Rowling uncovers a key point in the transgender ideology debate that many are overlooking

[Michie]

One of the richest and most famous writers in the world exposes what trans activists are willing to do to enforce their cultural domination, and most of the media remains silent.

(LifeSiteNews) – Last week, R&B star Macy Gray went on Piers Morgan’s TV shows and inadvertently stepped into the centre of America’s hottest culture war. “Just because you change your parts,” she told Morgan, “that doesn’t make you a woman.” Little did she know that she was contradicting the fundamental premises of the elite’s most powerful ideologues—and that they do not accept public dissent, least of all from celebrities. Gray turned from a beloved African American icon to an acceptable target overnight; Vanity Fair unironically called the pile-on “very public reeducation process.”


As Vanity Fair put it: “After speaking with a number of people in the LGBTQ+ community,  Macy Gray  says she’s reconsidered her opinions about trans women and her previous statements have been ‘grossly misunderstood.’” In short, she misunderstood that her heresies would put a bullseye on her back because everyone believed what she had said just fifteen short minutes ago, but after her struggle session she has acquired the right lines and can now parrot them obediently. “Being a woman is a vibe,” she said on the Today Show. “If you feel in your heart that’s what you are, that’s what you are.” And all the trans activists said: Amen. Good girl.

A debate over Gray’s recantation promptly erupted on Twitter between the different factions of those opposing gender ideology. Matt Walsh, who has been front and centre in the debate since his documentary What is a Woman? was released, tweeted that “women who publicly renounce the definition of ‘woman’ for fear of mean comments from trans activists deserve all the scorn they get. That kind of gutless cowardice is exactly what got us into this position in the first place.”

Continued below.
JK Rowling uncovers a key point in the transgender ideology debate that many are overlooking - LifeSite

 

[WarriorAngel]

reeducation -

One of the richest and most famous writers in the world exposes what trans activists are willing to do to enforce their cultural domination, and most of the media remains silent.

(LifeSiteNews) – Last week, R&B star Macy Gray went on Piers Morgan’s TV shows and inadvertently stepped into the centre of America’s hottest culture war. “Just because you change your parts,” she told Morgan, “that doesn’t make you a woman.” Little did she know that she was contradicting the fundamental premises of the elite’s most powerful ideologues—and that they do not accept public dissent, least of all from celebrities. Gray turned from a beloved African American icon to an acceptable target overnight; Vanity Fair unironically called the pile-on “very public reeducation process.”


As Vanity Fair put it: “After speaking with a number of people in the LGBTQ+ community,  Macy Gray  says she’s reconsidered her opinions about trans women and her previous statements have been ‘grossly misunderstood.’” In short, she misunderstood that her heresies would put a bullseye on her back because everyone believed what she had said just fifteen short minutes ago, but after her struggle session she has acquired the right lines and can now parrot them obediently. “Being a woman is a vibe,” she said on the Today Show. “If you feel in your heart that’s what you are, that’s what you are.” And all the trans activists said: Amen. Good girl.

A debate over Gray’s recantation promptly erupted on Twitter between the different factions of those opposing gender ideology. Matt Walsh, who has been front and centre in the debate since his documentary What is a Woman? was released, tweeted that “women who publicly renounce the definition of ‘woman’ for fear of mean comments from trans activists deserve all the scorn they get. That kind of gutless cowardice is exactly what got us into this position in the first place.”

Continued below.
JK Rowling uncovers a key point in the transgender ideology debate that many are overlooking - LifeSite

reeducation.. <~~ now that says it all.
Go from a common sense and albeit logical view of the human dna/chromosomes to some 'emotional and mental battle' [despite compassion needed yet isn't helpful giving in] to a new mantra that does zero to assist people in their crisis.

If you genuinely care for someone, you get them through it. You don't pretend which further destabilizes logic.

 

[WarriorAngel]

This is so sad...
In a time allegedly women have those long fought rights, they are pushed back into submission by a group of men who wish to improve what femininity is and moreover dare or threaten a woman disagree.

Consider the list of things Rowling says female critics of transgender ideology can expect: bomb threats, death threats, rape threats, doxing, loss of career, physical harassment. Nearly everyone engaged in the debate seems to accept at face value the idea that this is an accurate list; that women who dare question their cultural overlords in drag will face a backlash that ranges from threats of sexual assault to actual physical assault. One of the richest and most famous writers in the world—a writer—exposes what trans activists are willing to do to enforce their cultural domination, and most of the media remains silent.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

“Being a woman is a vibe,” she said on the Today Show. “If you feel in your heart that’s what you are, that’s what you are.”

So if a man feels the vibe of being a woman he can so go into the woman's bathroom and stuff. There's activism, but there's also healthy boundaries.

 

[Michie]

So if a man feels the vibe of being a woman he can so go into the woman's bathroom and stuff. There's activism, but there's also healthy boundaries.

There is no if, ands or buts about this as far as I’m concerned, I do not want a biological male disguised or identifying as a woman or not in the vicinity in what is supposed to be a safe space for actual biological females. This is a huge hit against REAL FEMALES.

And most most if these men identify as lesbians or have several other sexual fetishes? They are not lesbians any more than I am a frog. What happened to common sense? As well actual science and DNA?

 

[Katania]

I use public facilities as little as I can get away with. If we're getting to a point where large burly men self identifying as women get to walk into women only facilities and intimidate others with their presence, I'll try to stop using them altogether. I support efforts in the UK to stop our country from going down the road the US has gone down - where fully intact males are routinely placed in women's prisons based on their self identification as trans women and where feminism apparently fully supports this.

On another forum I occasionally post on, I had a bizarre conversation with a couple of American feminists about this. These women are normally the first to rail on men for being predators, they see misogyny on every corner etc. But their mindset seemed to be that all is forgiven once men identify as women. I pointed one of them to this story:

Transgender inmate accused of rape | News | Illinois Times

Her response was something like "women as well as men are capable of violence & sexual abuse." 15 years ago, it's the sort of comment anti-feminist (or possibly downright misogynistic) men would have made to wind women up. Now, it's a line from American feminists.

As a woman, I'm very grateful to JK Rowling for holding her ground on this and helping to ensure that there's a feminist network in the UK which supports women who have concerns about this development. The US seems to have no such thing. As you say, when Macy Gray spoke up she was quickly cowed into submission by trans activists who are aided and abetted by American feminists.

It's not great to have a feud that promotes resentment & hatred on both sides. It's certainly not a situation that feels very Christian to be part of, but Christian organisations are no more helpful to women than organised mainstream feminism is on this particular issue.

I've started listening to Christian Questions podcasts. Christian Podcast | Bible Questions | Christian Questions Radio and the first couple of podcasts I've listened to have been amazing in terms of the depth they go into in trying to understand scriptural passages and what they reveal to us. There are hundreds and hundreds of these podcasts, but I'm going to try to search through to see what they have on transgender issues...because at the moment, I'm feeling like that resource is the best one for me personally, to help me make sense of these rapidly changing social norms.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

There is no if, ands or buts about this as far as I’m concerned, I do not want a biological male disguised or identifying as a woman or not in the vicinity in what is supposed to be a safe space for actual biological females. This is a huge hit against REAL FEMALES.

And most most if these men identify as lesbians or have several other sexual fetishes? They are not lesbians any more than I am a frog. What happened to common sense? As well actual science and DNA?

Having been cursed with an extreme form of empathy over a decade ago, I understand a bit about this gender dysphoria people speak of. However, for me it was obvious that the feelings and other impulses were coming from (many) someone else(s). So there are similarities, but that's where it ends.

Fortunately, the occult elements encountered in church have been brought under submission. Not sure if this being allowed in my circumstance was just to give me perspective. That this perception, of being something you're not, is really rooted in the occult spiritual domains spreading, and nothing else.

I'll continue to pray on this matter.

 

[WarriorAngel]

Having been cursed with an extreme form of empathy over a decade ago, I understand a bit about this gender dysphoria people speak of. However, for me it was obvious that the feelings and other impulses were coming from (many) someone else(s). So there are similarities, but that's where it ends.

Fortunately, the occult elements encountered in church have been brought under submission. Not sure if this being allowed in my circumstance was just to give me perspective. That this perception, of being something you're not, is really rooted in the occult spiritual domains spreading, and nothing else.

I'll continue to pray on this matter.

I understand empathy.
Extreme.

If you know it, you can help heal it. I believe the gift is for healing.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

I understand empathy.
Extreme.

If you know it, you can help heal it. I believe the gift is for healing.

I understand a sacrament that is similar. It's in the healing sacrament section called "union with the passion of Christ"

Regrettably, the type of unity I was encountering with all people was more of an applied version of modalism, and therefore occult. So I'm in the process of shutting it down and replacing it with the godly version so there is no vacuum effect.

I don't think it's right if I walk around town and start feeling like anyone I pass by, my body doesn't have breasts, so I shouldn't feel that I do. This is what I meant by extreme, and curse. The above example stopped some years ago, but I must continue towards trinitarian style unity so it doesn't relapse.

 

[WarriorAngel]

I understand a sacrament that is similar. It's in the healing sacrament section called "union with the passion of Christ"

Regrettably, the type of unity I was encountering with all people was more of an applied version of modalism, and therefore occult. So I'm in the process of shutting it down and replacing it with the godly version so there is no vacuum effect.

I don't think it's right if I walk around town and start feeling like anyone I pass by, my body doesn't have breasts, so I shouldn't feel that I do. This is what I meant by extreme, and curse. The above example stopped some years ago, but I must continue towards trinitarian style unity so it doesn't relapse.

Well, people are connected and I could go on.
It's confusing and I learned to protect my mind from people. Still working on it. We must learn our thoughts from others, from temptation etc.

THIS IMHO is the reason people get in bad relationships. Empathy. And not only feeling sorry for someone, but probably much deeper. Picking up their attraction. etc

 

[Gregory Thompson]

Well, people are connected and I could go on.
It's confusing and I learned to protect my mind from people. Still working on it. We must learn our thoughts from others, from temptation etc.

THIS IMHO is the reason people get in bad relationships. Empathy. And not only feeling sorry for someone, but probably much deeper. Picking up their attraction. etc

Emotions are produced by the body, the flesh. Conducting those signals through electromagnetic contact is done by the body. It is not spiritual.

Best remedy I have found is to replace modalism with trinity. Since "the flesh" cannot discern "spiritual things" a unity protocol that is based on the trinity, excludes by virtue the flesh mirror.

Since Jesus prays "may they be one as we are" trinity applies here. The results are a unity that respects that I am me, but I am not you, and we are both human.

Relying on the default flesh mode of empathy leaves the whole network of humans open to occultism. So I have observed this is to be avoided.

Having an occult network with an outward appearance of Godliness results in all sorts of altered perceptions of reality, and susceptibility to demonic possession.

 

[WarriorAngel]

Emotions are produced by the body, the flesh. Conducting those signals through electromagnetic contact is done by the body. It is not spiritual.

Best remedy I have found is to replace modalism with trinity. Since "the flesh" cannot discern "spiritual things" a unity protocol that is based on the trinity, excludes by virtue the flesh mirror.

Since Jesus prays "may they be one as we are" trinity applies here. The results are a unity that respects that I am me, but I am not you, and we are both human.

Relying on the default flesh mode of empathy leaves the whole network of humans open to occultism. So I have observed this is to be avoided.

Having an occult network with an outward appearance of Godliness results in all sorts of altered perceptions of reality, and susceptibility to demonic possession.

I know this one guy who said to me 'You're not attracted to me, I usually can tell.'

So people do feel one another. It's what you pick up from another empathetically that can mislead.

I am lost on your theory of default flesh mode.

 

[Gregory Thompson]

I know this one guy who said to me 'You're not attracted to me, I usually can tell.'

So people do feel one another. It's what you pick up from another empathetically that can mislead.

I am lost on your theory of default flesh mode.

People who are born again by the Holy Spirit still retain the same physical bodies. Thus what you are talking about is possible, I wasn't saying it wasn't.

What I'm talking about is the spiritual manifestation that Christians Only can experience. This is in contrast to what all humans experience whether born again by the Holy Spirit or not.

In Christianity, we say we have a spiritual reality that is separate from all of the other religions. However, the empathy of the physical body is the basis for non-Christian spirituality. However, if this distinctness is not sought out or experienced by Christians, then the claims that "Christianity is just another religion" may have some basis.

I hope I have explained why the distinction is important.

The relation to the subject of this thread is, default use empathy results in being affected by the occult, and altered perceptions such as gender dysphoria, and also the new age concept that 1) I am everyone, I am you, and 2) I am god, so I do not encourage shared sensation empathy.

 

[WarriorAngel]

People who are born again by the Holy Spirit still retain the same physical bodies. Thus what you are talking about is possible, I wasn't saying it wasn't.

What I'm talking about is the spiritual manifestation that Christians Only can experience. This is in contrast to what all humans experience whether born again by the Holy Spirit or not.

In Christianity, we say we have a spiritual reality that is separate from all of the other religions. However, the empathy of the physical body is the basis for non-Christian spirituality. However, if this distinctness is not sought out or experienced by Christians, then the claims that "Christianity is just another religion" may have some basis.

I hope I have explained why the distinction is important.

The relation to the subject of this thread is, default use empathy results in being affected by the occult, and altered perceptions such as gender dysphoria, and also the new age concept that 1) I am everyone, I am you, and 2) I am god, so I do not encourage shared sensation empathy.

Grace? Gifts?
Grace is utterly impossible to explain.
It's not taught, and it goes beyond the scope of studying.

Only opting to know graces, hoping or desiring and praying can 'awaken' the soul and spirit of humans via the Almighty [Holy Spirit] What the Lord is always pouring unto humans will be 'noticed' when one opens to them.

 

[RileyG]

Yes, people have gender dysphoria. I won't argue with that.

Mutilating your body and pumping it with hormones won't solve anything and will only make the cross heavier to bear.