• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Jesus and Violence

Status
Not open for further replies.

eclipsoul

Lover
Apr 4, 2004
574
54
46
Washington, D.C.
Visit site
✟23,494.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
12volt_man, I truly do want to understand your position fully, and am
frustrated that my analogies weren't able to communicate to you my position.
I am confident that once we both understand one another, each of us will
learn something new. I am not being obtuse intentionally, and I know you
aren't either.

12volt_man said:
I already see the flaw in your thinking: you do not understand the difference in the nature and role of government and the church and you seem not to be overly concerned with following the context of the passage.

Then, at last (perhaps), we've come to an agreement on where we differ.

I see the context of Romans 13 as a teaching against rebellion.
You see the context of Romans 13 as a teaching on proper governance.

My understanding of the context of Romans 13 stems from knowing that
Christians were being killed by the government. It is natural to want to rebel
against the authorities when they crucify you. Yet in the spirit of Jesus'
nonviolence, Paul teaches us not to rebel.

Is Romans 13 a teaching on proper governance, or is it a teaching against
rebellion - a teaching which refuses to let Christians use violence, even when
it is against a government which wants to destroy them?

It is profitable, when dwelling upon the context of Romans 13, to ponder
Peter's teachings:

Slaves, submit yourselves to your masters with all respect, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh. For it is commendable if a man bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because he is conscious of God... To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.

With a sincere and loving heart, I ask all of you to consider following Christ,
and to bear the cross of unjust suffering as he did. I ask you to consider
loving your enemies. I ask you to consider becoming a slave to all. And
finally, I ask you to consider Jesus' words, and to ponder their meaning in your
life as I ponder them in my own...

"Why do you call me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ and do not do what I say?"


I pray that our answer is not this:

Christ's commands to His followers and Paul's teaching concerning the nature and role of government are two different teachings concerning two different things.

God bless. :)
 
Upvote 0

12volt_man

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2004
7,339
260
✟9,150.00
Faith
Christian
eclipsoul said:
I see the context of Romans 13 as a teaching against rebellion.
You see the context of Romans 13 as a teaching on proper governance.

What's the difference? How does that negate Paul's teaching on the role of government?

I pray that our answer is not this:

And I pray that our answer is not yours. The last thing we should do is abandon all discernment for the sake of our political ideologies.
 
Upvote 0

eclipsoul

Lover
Apr 4, 2004
574
54
46
Washington, D.C.
Visit site
✟23,494.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
12volt_man said:
I see the context of Romans 13 as a teaching against rebellion.
You see the context of Romans 13 as a teaching on proper governance.

What's the difference? How does that negate Paul's teaching on the role of government?

Paul says that Christians should not rebel against government, but does that
mean government is good?

Paul says that slaves should not rebel against their masters, but does that
mean slavery is good?


Unfortunately, there are many Christians who do believe in slavery - simply
because Paul told slaves not to rebel. Yet I think you and I would both agree
on the error of such logic.

On a personal note, I think that I've been attacked unjustly for having some
sort of "political ideology". I follow no political party, and do not vote. The
only man I follow is Christ (and well, I dont even do a very good job of that,
but I'll keep trying).

I think, perhaps, that my partner in this debate is getting a little frustrated
with my answer (as am I with his), and in our love for Christ, we want to do
our best to bring one another closer to Truth. And so, I understand and
forgive the misunderstanding, and ask for the same from him. I only write this
here, because I think it is a chance to show the world how true Christians
interact with one another - with understanding, patience, and utter Love.

God bless, and may the peace of Christ be with you all, forever. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.