Jerome Corsi Says He Couldn't Lie?

[Ana the Ist]

He was just shot from behind, Clinton style.

I don't think that's what "Clinton style" entails...I'm pretty sure a dress, cigar, and office desk are involved.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Also, let's not forget that when you subtract the letters in Corsi from Ocasio-Cortez....you're left with "ooze cat".

I wouldn't line my cat's litter box with some of the things 40% of the american public are inclined to believe.

Anything you'd like to tell us variant ? If that is your real name...

 

[DaisyDay]

Corsi isn't an elected official...unless something that I never heard of happened during midterms.

That's right, he is a player behind the throne, so to speak.

Ocasio-Cortez on the other hand....

Is not the subject of this thread. Please try to stay on track.

Mr. Corsi has filed a suit against Mueller now.

Corsi files formal complaint against Mueller

His claim is that the special prosecutor was pressuring him to falsely admit that he lied...but he insists that he didn't lie (in this particular case), he merely forgot he sent those incriminating messages.

Complaint (pdf).

 

[Ana the Ist]

That's right, he is a player behind the throne, so to speak.

And?

Is not the subject of this thread. Please try to stay on track.

Tell it to Summer...he brought up Ocasio-Cortez over a week ago, in a post you replied to no less.

No reason why I shouldn't be able to do the same.

 

[KWCrazy]

Conspiracy theory forum is that way.

So you believe it was a robbery, even though nothing was taken and whoever killed him just walked up behind him, shot him and kept going? Baaahhh.

 

[USincognito]

No, the person in the DNC working with Wikileaks was found and killed by the orders from Hillary Clinton. His name was Seth Rich. The police called it a robbery but nothing was taken. He was just shot from behind, Clinton style.

^^^ And now we enter Corsi territory

 

[essentialsaltes]

So you believe it was a robbery, even though nothing was taken and whoever killed him just walked up behind him, shot him and kept going? Baaahhh.

The crime has not been solved, so we may never know for certain.
I know the police have judged that it was a robbery.
I have no reason to believe otherwise, so I believe it was a robbery.
I know you have no credible evidence that Seth Rich was involved with Wikileaks.
And I know you have no credible evidence that Hillary ordered his murder.

 

[KWCrazy]

The crime has not been solved, so we may never know for certain.

No crime with possible ties to the Clintons is ever solved. Even when Bill Clinton was on tape suborning perjury from Gennifer Flowers or the attorney general admitting that time after time Hillary lied under oath about her illegal use of the private server.

I know the police have judged that it was a robbery.

Police said it was suicide when a woman Bill Clinton was involved with was shot in the back of the head and even when Vince Foster's body was found in Ft Marcy Park.

I have no reason to believe otherwise, so I believe it was a robbery.

You believe it was a robbery though nothing was taken? I believe you stole my car because it wasn't taken either. Seth Rich was shot twice in the back, or as they say, double tapped center of mass. Nothing was taken. Saying that it was a botched robbery proves you are too uninformed to vote. Rich was killed for passing Hillary's emails to WikkiLeaks.

I know you have no credible evidence that Seth Rich was involved with Wikileaks.

How many times has Jullian Assange personally offered a reward for the capture of someone's killer? Why would he do that for a low level staffer he didn't even know? Some things require thought; even though the media insists you stop thinking and just believe.

And I know you have no credible evidence that Hillary ordered his murder.

Who else had motive, opportunity and the means to carry it out?

 

[essentialsaltes]

How many times has Jullian Assange personally offered a reward for the capture of someone's killer? Why would he do that for a low level staffer he didn't even know? Some things require thought.

Who cares? Why did OJ offer half a million dollars for information about 'the real killer or killers'? How much thought does it require to determine that he had a motive other than a sincere one?

Who else had motive, opportunity and the means to carry it out?

You should read the thread on the link between teleological thinking and conspiracy thinking.