Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
OK, what is your plan? How do you propose to deal with Hamas? Or would you prefer to see Israel cease to exist as a nation and 6 million more Jews put to death?They failed on both counts. They didn't protect their own and now they are endangering them further by dealing with their enemy in a manner which is losing them friends.
Don't be nonsensical. I've already said that I agree with a multi national peace keeping force as you suggested.OK, what is your plan? How do you propose to deal with Hamas? Or would you prefer to see Israel cease to exist as a nation and 6 million more Jews put to death?
The problem is, Hamas is just one of Iran's proxies. Hezbollah (and maybe even Houthis) are a much bigger threat. Iran's plan was to attack Israel with all it's proxies, Hamas jumped the gun as they wanted all the glory to themselves. I have no idea what should be done, but as a Biblical Christian I know how it will end.My solution is simple. Israel withdraws completely and the UN sends in forces to control Gaza and protect Israel 100% from Hamas' aggression. Israel goes back to a peaceful existence while the UN runs around in circles trying to do the impossible. I'd buy a bag of popcorn to watch that show.
A quick internet search:You said that millions supported Hamas. That is patently wrong. They are supporting Palestinians.
What better idea do you have in mind that would convince Hamas to stop murdering Jews and surrender to Israel?Yeh let's just wait until Israel has killed a load more Palestinians and then let's rig the later investigation so they are declared innocent. I'm sure that's the morally right thing to do. Or Biden could find some backbone and tell Netanyahu enough is enough - you cannot kill an idea with bullets but you can kill it with a better idea - a just resolution giving dignity to all the people who live in the region.
I think a peace keeping force presumes that peace precedes their presence. If multi-national means a coalition of Muslim countries sending their sons and daughters into the conflict in Gaza to attain that peace, then such an idea has possibilities.I agree with a multi national peace keeping force as you suggested.
The problem is, Hamas is just one of Iran's proxies. Hezbollah (and maybe even Houthis) are a much bigger threat. Iran's plan was to attack Israel with all it's proxies, Hamas jumped the gun as they wanted all the glory to themselves. I have no idea what should be done, but as a Biblical Christian I know how it will end.
God is clear how it will end, I don't understand why you made this commentYou know how it will end?
Best keep it under your hat.
"He who knows does not tell,
he who tells does not know."
God is clear how it will end, I don't understand why you made this comment
and creating more anger and recruiting more people for Hamas. It doesn't take much imagination to work out how this bombardment affects those under (often literally) it e.g. just replace Gaza with Ukraine and Israel with Russia.They failed on both counts. They didn't protect their own and now they are endangering them further by dealing with their enemy in a manner which is losing them friends.
How can anyone believe such an absurd claim? Like others, you appear to be defending the view that because Gazan terrorists started the present conflict, Israel bears no responsibility for the nature of their response.If hamas had not attacked Israel, Israel would not be in Gaza. It is as simple as that. This war is the responsibility of hamas as are all the casualties.
It's a foolish demand for Hamas to quit attacking Israel and let the hostages go? I'm done with you. You are obviously unable to grasp the simplest logic.Except their airport was blown up, and they had no access to the sea and were surrounded by barbed wire and regulated heavily etc?
So vote them out
Ridiculous claim, when they have mass murdered civilians for many weeks now.
Proof?
? Communist saying I think that they may have (like many other folks) adopted
Proof?
Normal people do not mass murder civilians
Let the ones bombing civilians be silent and not make foolish demands.
I'm 72. I have rarely come across such stupidity as yours and the others who are clueless as to the nature of the Gaza conflict. None of you bleeding hearts have come up with an alternative to what Israel is doing. You conveniently ignore the facts of the situation, that's if you've even bothered to find out anything.How can anyone believe such an absurd claim? Like others, you appear to be defending the view that because Gazan terrorists started the present conflict, Israel bears no responsibility for the nature of their response.
That is, of course, a position that cannot be taken seriously.
I think a peace keeping force presumes that peace precedes their presence. If multi-national means a coalition of Muslim countries sending their sons and daughters into the conflict in Gaza to attain that peace, then such an idea has possibilities.
History tells us that until an unjust aggressor is vanquished that peace is impossible. Let the Muslims police their own criminals.
I was being sarcastic. What nation would contribute to a peace keeping force? And there has to be peace before you can keep it. I asked what practical solution there was. Peacekeeping may work (the UN's track record is not great) but it's not going to happen. Not one nation has suggested it. I doubt that anyone who matters frequents this forum. If they do, they have ignored my advice.Don't be nonsensical. I've already said that I agree with a multi national peace keeping force as you suggested.
Of course. JesusYou have a solution to the problem?
If the land cannot be shared and co habituated by the former residents then you are saying it is one or the other. Well, Israel has no right from God to be there until they are saved and He restores them to that land. The land will be theirs forever as promised, but not while they are enemies of God and in unbelief. So that leaves regular folks that need to share land. Work it out. Otherwise, if one neighbor is surrounded by many neighbors who don't accept their title to the property then it cannot end well.Hint. Expecting Palestinians to accept a two state solution is not it. They have had a number of opportunities and refused to take them. They will only settle for a one state solution, one where Israel ceases to exist.
I guess Christians have not been preaching in all the world and making converts of all men enough. They need to work on that. If Christians support the wanton slaughter of their people in Gaza, how would you imagine that they would embrace Christianity??If they get away with destroying Israel, Christians will be next. I'm 72 so it matters little to me personally. I do care about my children and the next generation. Communism is rare these days. Useful idiots abound. "Queers for Palestine"? Muslims hate homosexuality and cheerfully kills gays. Maybe you should go visit Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq or Iran. You should make sure you tell everyone that you are a Christian. I doubt you'd get out of the airport alive.
Yes it is about as foolish as Hamas demanding Israel lay down their arms and vacate the country.It's a foolish demand for Hamas to quit attacking Israel and let the hostages go? I'm done with you. You are obviously unable to grasp the simplest logic.
Why? It's an important piece to this. All stopping does is remove focus from where it should be. You have to have perspective on who started this. If you don't compare you can't figure out who the real bad guy is and what needs to be done about it.I mean, you guys really have to stop doing this. Honestly. Seriously, just stop.
You want to talk about stupidity? All right, let's talk about stupidity. The textbook definition of stupidity would be to argue that agent B is relieved all responsibilities for their actions just because agent A provoked agent B.I'm 72. I have rarely come across such stupidity as yours and the others who are clueless as to the nature of the Gaza conflict. None of you bleeding hearts have come up with an alternative to what Israel is doing. You conveniently ignore the facts of the situation, that's if you've even bothered to find out anything.
Please explain precisely how pointing out the idiocy of arguing that Israel is automatically relieved of all responsibilities for their reactions simply because Hamas instigated the war constitutes evidence of "ignoring the facts of the situation"?You conveniently ignore the facts of the situation, that's if you've even bothered to find out anything.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?