• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Islam doesn't condone terror

Status
Not open for further replies.

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I'm from middle-east myself

Hi, and welcome to CF! I started this thread, and haven't looked at it in over a month. This "place" amazes me in that I can come in contact w/ people from such different backgrounds, that otherwise I might not, ever. You and Ishraqiyun seem to be following up on my original intent, and I thank you

There will be many questions - please forgive my ignorance. The world is a big place! The perspectives gained from opposite sides of it truly do give different meanings to seeing the same things ...
 
Upvote 0

StThomasMore

Christian Democrat
Feb 27, 2011
1,584
95
✟24,751.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat


I don't think genocide or mass killing is dependent on the culture or the times. Killing is killing and everyone in their God given conscience knows its wrong because it is written in the heart by divine law.
So being against the glorification of killing and genocide more has to do with inner intuition than political correctness.

Political correctness is more saying something like gay marriage is not wrong out of worry of being labeled a bigot by the media and political system.
 
Upvote 0

Ishraqiyun

Fanning the Divine Spark
Mar 22, 2011
4,882
169
Montsalvat
✟28,535.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Than please explain the difference between national-socialism and faith-socialism..
I'm not sure what faith socialism is.

Like the fact that many (some 40% in some polls) of Muslims in the west want to impose Sharia in the West? Is that perhaps the Islam you are referring to?
Can you link to the poll ? I don't see what it has to do with terrorism though? Supporting sharia law = terrorism?
 
Upvote 0

FRM48

Honorably Discharged Vet
Jan 31, 2011
354
50
62
Home
✟24,253.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution

By that definition even Islam is guilty of P.C. Don't say anything against the prophet or allah.Don't draw a cartoon of mohammed.Lol nice definition Henry.
 
Upvote 0

plenary

Newbie
Jan 18, 2011
210
7
✟22,874.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I'm not sure what faith socialism is.
It is in some respects exactly the same, except that it doesn't deal with race but with specific religion. If one wants to understand national-socialism (and thereby faith or religion-socialism) one must understand the pillars of the hells...)
There are three pillars in the hells, which are self-love, egoism and the love to rule others... These are the fundamental characteristics of the devils....
Why? Because these aren't really loves, but types of hatred.

And loving only your own race, or own religion, is self-love... Which is no love at all... Wanting to destroy another race or to dominate over another race or religion, is the love of rule, which is another part of the deep hellish loves... Which is dark, sinister and will bring condemnation.

That is why, in Christian laws, the highest in the heavens is the one who serves, not the one who rules... Because if one wants to rule others, one is not in the heavenly state, but in the hellish state...

The love of self, is the love that breeds egoism and the love to rule.... The love of self is called the devlish love, which leads to the deepest of hells... This can also be called the devlish hatred...
And it gets worse, because as heavenly love has a Son, which is called Truth, also hellish hatred has a son, which is called lie... Which is depicted in the love for the material World (Because the world stands for the lie, just as the heavens stand for Truth)... This is called the satanic characteristic...

(which is Christian doctrine, maybe you can now understand why Jesus is called the "Son of God" and He Himself proclaimed to be The Way, the Truth and the Life.... Because the Son of God and Truth are exactly the same thing, the Word of God made flesh... That is why Christ could resurrect people just by uttering one word... He Is the Master of the Universe, Lord and God almighty... The Father and the Son are one and the same.)

And what did Muhammad proclaim:
Which is a big problem, if one grasps the demonic and satanic loves...



Muhammad was indeed the messenger of Allah, but not of God... Because if he had been, he had proclaimed the following:

Thus spoke the Lord...
Can you link to the poll ? I don't see what it has to do with terrorism though? Supporting sharia law = terrorism?
Multiculturalism 'drives young Muslims to shun British values' | Mail Online

From the poll:

While only 17 per cent of over-55s said they would prefer to live under Sharia law, that increased to 37 per cent of those aged 16 to 24.
Chopping of limbs because of thievery, is so unjust, one can only weep... Christian law is the exact opposite of this supposedly law of God.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Ishraqiyun

Fanning the Divine Spark
Mar 22, 2011
4,882
169
Montsalvat
✟28,535.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
So you think faith socialism = Islam and we can understand it better by studying National Socialism?

Christian law is the exact opposite of this supposedly law of God.

Jesus (pbuh) didn't set forth any juridical laws and penalties in the first place. It would make more sense to compare it with the Old Testament which does. Is the Old Testament evil?

O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty. (9:123)




This was when permission was given to fight some of the unbelievers who were persecuting and waging war against the Islamic community. If you are a total pacifist I can understand your opposition to it but if you do believe that there is a time to fight in defense I can't see how you could attack them for doing so.
 
Upvote 0

Ishraqiyun

Fanning the Divine Spark
Mar 22, 2011
4,882
169
Montsalvat
✟28,535.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
As for the meaning of "cutting off their hands":

The derivatives that are read in the 2nd verb form (QaTTaA) occur 17 times. This form, which expresses intensity or frequency of the action, is used both to mean physical cutting off [5:33, 7:124, 20:71, 26:49, 13:31] and metaphorical cutting off [2:166, 6:94, 7:160, 7:167, 9:110, 47:15, 47:22, 21:93, 22:19, 23:53] as well as physically cutting/marking [12:31, 12:50]. It is interesting to note that even though 12:31 uses the more intensive verb form and both "cut" and "hands" together, it does not mean "cut off". The less intensive form is used in 5:38.

Secondly, the Arabic word for "hands" (aydi) is often used in The Quran in a metaphorical/metonymical manner [some examples are 2:195, 2:237, 3:3, 3:73, 5:64, 6:93, 8:70, 9:29, 23:88, 28:47, 30:36, 38:45, 48:10, 48:24, 111:1], and often has a meaning of power/means. It should also be noted that this word is in the Arabic plural meaning 3 or more hands, whilst only two people are referenced: the male and the female thief. Some have commented that this plural usage causes problems for the common interpretation of hand cutting.

Thus, it is possible to understand the punishment for thieves in three alternative ways, (1) cutting off their hands, or (2) cutting or marking their hands, or (3) cutting their means to steal, or cutting their hands from committing the crime. It is up to the society to choose one of these meanings or a combination of them depending on the severity of the crime and their ability to enforce the penalty.
 
Upvote 0

plenary

Newbie
Jan 18, 2011
210
7
✟22,874.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
No it wasn't... Because it is stated that the infidels should be wiped out to the last...

En even in wartime, that is not the predicament... One should strive to conquer to enemy, when he is evil, not to wipe the enemy out... Which is a statement of hatred in itself.

Only the judgments of God are such, that there was a demise of an entire group of people, such as Sodom and Gomorra and the great flood... Which has all to do with the evil of the people.

And yes, there will be other judgments, which will not be of man, but of God... If certain groups are planning the demise of for example the Jews, it will mean their own demise, as can be read in certain prophetic texts....
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

StThomasMore

Christian Democrat
Feb 27, 2011
1,584
95
✟24,751.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat


I don't think you have to be politically correct to know that sawing off a POWs head is somehow wrong.
 
Upvote 0

Ishraqiyun

Fanning the Divine Spark
Mar 22, 2011
4,882
169
Montsalvat
✟28,535.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
En even in wartime, that is not the predicament... One should strive to conquer to enemy, when he is evil, not to wipe the enemy out... Which is a statement of hatred in itself.
What do you make of :

"This is what the LORD Almighty says: 'I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy everything that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys." (1st Sam 15:2-3)


Or Numbers 31:7-18 ?

No it wasn't... Because it is stated that the infidels should be wiped out to the last...
The specific infidels who were waging war against them. The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) also specified the proper behavior in times of war and what would violate the limit. Specifically in the hadith the Prophet (pbuh) said not to kill women, children, and the aged. He also said not to kill pilgrims , people under your protection, or monks and nuns. He also commanded Muslims to protect prisoners of war.

http://ilovemuhammed.com/answering-the-critics/claims-against-islam/59-jihad-in-islam
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

plenary

Newbie
Jan 18, 2011
210
7
✟22,874.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Mankind has been able to corrupt the message of Love of Christ and has murderd, killed and oppressed in the name of love... What does one think will happen with a message which is from Satan himself??

Jesus taught light, Muhammad darkness.....
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Palermo

İ love my Heavenly Father
Mar 25, 2011
113
1
✟15,261.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
''islam doesnt condone terror''

it must be an irony

''islam is religion of peaaacee'' im bored hearing this :S, yeah,its religion of peace,sure,mohammad killed many people in his life and taken their wives,and their children as slaves.there are many hadiths about execution of apostates (especially in bukhrai,such as ''bukhari 52:260,Bukhari 84:57 bukhari 89:271) and verses in quran about discriminating ''others'' such as forcing them to pay jizya(i think this is a humiliation),not be friend with them and slay polytheists whereever you find them,islam condones terrorism in the name of allah

also there are some scholars encouraging jihad and slaying others.also nonmuslims are 2.nd class citizens in sharia-ruled countries
 
Upvote 0

TG123

Regular Member
Jul 1, 2006
4,965
203
somewhere
✟29,469.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Find me the passage in the Quran that says Islam wants to dominate the world. Please list the Surah.

And also please show me where in either verse you mentioned is it stated that it is OK to forcefully convert someone to Islam.

Thanks.
 
Upvote 0

StThomasMore

Christian Democrat
Feb 27, 2011
1,584
95
✟24,751.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The weird thing with the Quran, is in one verse it can be a religion of peace, and then a verse right after it is one of war and even terror. The Quran seems to go back and forth a lot between the peace/war issue. One verse says the "people of the Book" are good, and then another says to 'slay them whenever you see them" and to "cast terror in their hearts". Then it says "there is no compulsion in religion".

So its no surprise that there will be the "religion of peace" crowd and the "religion of jihad" crowd. As the Quran sanctions both ways. It seems to have everything for both the peacemaker and the warlord.

The Mecca verses tend to be much softer. Whereas the Medina verses are much more harsher and war oriented. It seems maybe Mohammad's wrote harshly more when he noticed more opposition against him.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.