And as usual you just don't get it.
Have you come across a history book where it is left to the reader to arrive at the date of an event?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And as usual you just don't get it.Then I'll take your post with a grain of salt, since James Ussher arrived at a 4004 BC date.
And he didn't even use an electronic calculator.
No, but if you have a science book -- (or any book for that matter) -- which gives peoples names and times of births, and you can concatenate them, then it doesn't take a Rhodes scholar to calculate the passage of time.And as usual you just don't get it.
Have you come across a history book where it is left to the reader to arrive at the date of an event?
Free will is not a flaw.
Enough of your pussyfooting does the Bible record a creation date of 4004 BC, yes or no.No, but if you have a science book -- (or any book for that matter) -- which gives peoples names and times of births, and you can concatenate them, then it doesn't take a Rhodes scholar to calculate the passage of time.
Even Jesus is said to have been crucified at the age of 33.
Ready it yourself and find out.Enough of your pussyfooting does the Bible record a creation date of 4004 BC, yes or no.
You're more than welcome to answer it for me.Guess answering can take a hike along with science.....
And as far as "along with science" is concerned, I take it from your previous posts that you agree with me?
Interesting how academia can concatenate the pharaohs, but go 404 with the Bible.Guess answering can take a hike along with science.....
Interesting how academia can concatenate the pharaohs, but go 404 with the Bible.
You have a good point, but the fact of the matter is, I think collective academia is so overrun with the tares now, that it's hard to separate them.You need to stop using the word "academia" as an umbrella term for everything that doesn't jive with your particular viewpoint. You might be blacklisting some of your own allies who touch upon issues to support the Bible that YOU NEVER touch.
You have a good point, but the fact of the matter is, I think collective academia is so overrun with the tares now, that it's hard to separate them.
I too have a college degree, my pastor has two doctorates, and several people in our church have degrees and certificates; but I still use that "umbrella term" because "my own allies" are the exception now, rather than the rule.
So what word should I use then?I do get what you're saying, BUT because I'm an academic, I think it's in my cognitive power---even my God given cognitive power---to make fine distinctions.
I think it's in your power too to do so.
Post of the year.Science is amazing when it comes to creating and discovering things - it terrible when trying to tell us about the past (because of the unknowns and assumptions it has to make).
God is deceptive? Where did that concept come from? God creating Adam as a man instead of a baby was deceptive?
Science is amazing when it comes to creating and discovering things - it terrible when trying to tell us about the past (because of the unknowns and assumptions it has to make).
Denial of the collective ways stemming from multiple unrelated scientific fields to make sense of the past will lead to strange, problematic thinking.Science is amazing when it comes to creating and discovering things - it terrible when trying to tell us about the past (because of the unknowns and assumptions it has to make).
Pretty vague and opionated.Science is amazing when it comes to creating and discovering things - it terrible when trying to tell us about the past (because of the unknowns and assumptions it has to make).
Denying something a person knows nothingDenial of the collective ways stemming from multiple unrelated scientific fields to make sense of the past will lead to strange, problematic thinking.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?