Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And who records "History" the official
True History? That exists only in dream world.
Anyone who has taken part in an event
and then reads the news account knows
theres different histories by the next day.
What would you expect? Why would you expect them to be different?The human remains and the charcoal were carbon dated to the same to time?
The recorded history as in "written" history is ~6000 years old. Are you claiming that writing was invented about the YEC time of Adam & Eve? To do so you need to defy a logical earth, deny all dating methods and find excuses for everything recorded that is older than 6000 years. That is quite a deep rabbit hole to go down.I accept historically dated events understanding that the further you go back in recorded history the less accurate they are. But I accept that Germany invaded Poland in 1939. No additional proof is necessary. The recorded history speaks itself. Recorded history does not rely on assumptions and unknowns. Science, especially without recorded History, heavily relies on assumptions and unknowns. It’s basically useless without recorded history to confirm the results
What would you expect? Why would you expect them to be different?
I know creationists are good at coming up with "just so stories" but they invariably lead you...
View attachment 324579
You needed to do all that "study"No one writes the "official True History." Because no one human can.
See? The study of the Philosophy of History and Htistoriography does come in handy ...
Or flight to Neptune with all the Flood water.What would you expect? Why would you expect them to be different?
I know creationists are good at coming up with "just so stories" but they invariably lead you...
View attachment 324579
You needed to do all that "study"
to figure there is no official True history.
That is the most disconnected "because"Yes, because believe it or not, not everyone was born with a Marxian pacifier in their mouths. I wasn't.
On the flip side, though, not everyone had parents who put a Bible in their cradle either. I didn't.
That is the most disconnected "because"
I've seen recently.
You do know don't you that HK Is
a hotbed of capitalism?
I have an uncle who is still convinced
Mao was the greatest, but I'm a very
happy recipient of the bennies of capitalism.
Anyway, I know you did not have to study
Historiographicalism to know there's no
official true history.
Oh course with my background of helicopterSure I had to study Historiography and the Philosophy of History!!!! You know why don't you? Because I was born into a capitalistic, individualistic, anti-intellectual prone, "free" nation that enabled me from birth to be and to remain a below average American thinker at will. Mostly.
I didn't understand squat about the world, and what's more, until age 17, I didn't really care to understand. Nor did I really want to know, let alone maintain a memory about whatever it was they were teaching me in Junior High through High School. Any appreciation or clear thinking about History wasn't on my conceptual radar as a kid or teenager. Comic books were. Sci-Fi movies were. Being an "artist" was.
More importantly, my statement about "Marxian" perspectives wasn't a slight at you. So, don't assume it was. Why? Because .................... in the U.S., we have Marxian theorists of all types running rampant over here in this "here Capitalist" society, particularly in the Social Science/Sociology sectors of the universities. Hence, we also have folks (like me) who have learned from Michel Foucault and/or Pierre Bourdieu, among other similar theorists, who teach what they teach at the universities---mostly on a wider scale, like they did at my university.
Because charcoal and the human remains would not be the same age?What would you expect? Why would you expect them to be different?
I know creationists are good at coming up with "just so stories" but they invariably lead you...
View attachment 324579
Not a rabbit hole at all you tell me, how could the earth be created 6000 years ago but something dated older than that?The recorded history as in "written" history is ~6000 years old. Are you claiming that writing was invented about the YEC time of Adam & Eve? To do so you need to defy a logical earth, deny all dating methods and find excuses for everything recorded that is older than 6000 years. That is quite a deep rabbit hole to go down.
You are need to support such claims as to why the ages would be different.Because charcoal and the human remains would not be the same age?
You are the one making a claim a young earth. Creations have to deny all dating methods that provides dates older than 6000 years which in light of the consilience of evidence it is a very deep rabbit hole.Not a rabbit hole at all you tell me, how could the earth be created 6000 years ago but something dated older than that?
Yes but I don’t have an issue with million year old rocks when the earth was created 6000 years ago. That would seem logical to me.You are the one making a claim a young earth. Creations have to deny all dating methods that provides dates older than 6000 years which in light of the consilience of evidence it is a very deep rabbit hole.
Yes but I don’t have an issue with million year old rocks when the earth was created 6000 years ago. That would seem logical to me.
This is not a response to my post but a diversion.I accept historically dated events understanding that the further you go back in recorded history the less accurate they are. But I accept that Germany invaded Poland in 1939. No additional proof is necessary. The recorded history speaks itself. Recorded history does not rely on assumptions and unknowns. Science, especially without recorded History, heavily relies on assumptions and unknowns. It’s basically useless without recorded history to confirm the results
You have no idea what "my camp" thinks, do you?Why is that logical?
Or are you in AVs camp that God is deceptive in making the world 6000 years ago but made it all look, in every single testable way, 4.5 billion years old?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?