M
ManFromUncle
Guest
Is Silverstein the Key to Breaking 9/11 Wide Open? | Peace . Gold . LOVE
Mob busts are always accomplished by turning the burros into states evidence – the runners, the carriers, the bag men. You immunize them or grant them plea bargains in exchange for giving up the higher ups who know more. The charges against them are easily proven. They get caught red-handed, with the load, the gun, trying to ditch the car whatever. There are two open-and-shut cases against bag men in 9/11: Rudy Giuliani for felony destruction of evidence, and Larry Silverstein.
The owner of the WTC put his foot in his mouth when he told PBS that they decided to “pull” Building 7. "Pull it" is a term used by demolitions experts which means "pull" the building down, also used in the military for some military demo devices requiring a "twist and pull" motion. WTC 7 is the weakest link in the chain of lies that is the official story. Not hit by any planes, it nevertheless sank, dead-level at free-fall acceleration, into its own footprint on 9/11, the third building which disappeared from the skyline within seconds. The building held an emergency command and control center for disasters built by Rudy Giuliani.
Silverstein said:
Prosecutor: Mr. Silverstein, it is clear you knew WTC7 was wired for demolition. It is on-camera on national TV. You said they decided to "pull it." How did you know at that time that the building was wired? Who wired it?
Larry: I meant pull out the firefighters.
Prosecutor: But Mr. Silverstein, you know the firefighters had all been pulled out many hours before the building collapsed. You also said, after saying "so we pulled it," the words "and we watched the building collapse." So it is obvious you were referring to a demolition.
Larry: I wish to invoke my 5th Amendment.
Prosecutor: Very well you have that right. Your honor, I request you direct the bailiff to place Mr. Silverstein under arrest as a suspect in the crime of 9/11. Mr. Silverstein, you may want to reconsider. If you are more forthcoming we may be able to arrange a plea bargain.
Larry: If I do that I'm as good as dead.
Prosecutor: Think about it, Larry.
Any honest prosecutor must acknowledge that Silverstein:
- admitted to foreknowledge of the crime.
- as owner of the WTC was in a position to provide access to the entire complex
- actually profited immensely from the attacks, through a court decision doubling his insurance payment by counting the attack as two events, one for each tower hit.
Silverstein took the insurance out just six weeks before 9/11.
We also know that Silverstein was not at breakfast on 9/11 at his usual table at the Windows on the World restaurant in WTC1. Silverstein told Charlie Rose that he had breakfast meetings there "every morning" since July 26th of that year. Remarkably, Silverstein's son and daughter, who worked for him on the 88th floor of the North Tower, were also not in their usual places. The New York Observer reports that they were "running late" that day. (Another who escaped death due to a last minute change is Bush cousin Jim Pearce.)
Therefore any honest prosecutor must view Silverstein with heightened interest if not outright suspicion. Silverstein blocked his own out by linking "pull it" to WTC7's "collapse." There is no satisfactory explanation for this admission to foreknowledge, caught on tape. If he does not answer how he got that foreknowledge he can be held in contempt. If he pleads the Fifth that's as good as a confession to some juries, especially with his monetary gain, and can be found guilty without testifying against himself.
Checkmate.
Additionally there is the remarkable material witness testimony of Fox News reporter Jeffrey Shapiro, who in an article criticizing "conspiracy theories" nevertheless reveals:
2014 is the Year of Truth. You don't start at the top. You start at the bottom. Bottom-feeder Silverstein knows something. The billions he profited are small potatoes compared to the agenda of the big boys. 2014 is the year of getting beyond the "what" that is the shills' preferred battleground, because they simply repeat the silly index card points about the towers, for example, being like "hollow tubes."
Whoever allowed Silverstein on-camera to shoot-off his mouth made a grievous error. One problem with the criminally insane is you never know what they are going to say. There is no moral compass, so what is shocking to us, sounds fine to them.
We're moving the debate to the who and why. The trick to that is getting the bag men talking. On March 1, 1967, New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison arrested and charged New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw with conspiring to assassinate President Kennedy, reflecting the fact that law enforcement in America is not monolithic, but consists of thousands of elected fiefdoms.
Because the effects of 9/11 were felt across the country, sending young men to war in almost every county, jurisdiction can be asserted by almost any DA. Garrison's case against Shaw was far flimsier and more circumstantial than the direct evidence against Silverstein.
The case is momentous. If Silverstein is the key to the higher ups, then WTC7 is the key to 9/11. Because if one building was wired, they were all wired.
Look up you local DA
[youtube]-jPzAakHPpk[/youtube]
Mob busts are always accomplished by turning the burros into states evidence – the runners, the carriers, the bag men. You immunize them or grant them plea bargains in exchange for giving up the higher ups who know more. The charges against them are easily proven. They get caught red-handed, with the load, the gun, trying to ditch the car whatever. There are two open-and-shut cases against bag men in 9/11: Rudy Giuliani for felony destruction of evidence, and Larry Silverstein.
The owner of the WTC put his foot in his mouth when he told PBS that they decided to “pull” Building 7. "Pull it" is a term used by demolitions experts which means "pull" the building down, also used in the military for some military demo devices requiring a "twist and pull" motion. WTC 7 is the weakest link in the chain of lies that is the official story. Not hit by any planes, it nevertheless sank, dead-level at free-fall acceleration, into its own footprint on 9/11, the third building which disappeared from the skyline within seconds. The building held an emergency command and control center for disasters built by Rudy Giuliani.
Silverstein said:
"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.
Silverstein later tried to correct his slip by saying what he meant was "pull" out the firefighters, hoping no one would notice that the pronoun used was "it," not "them." One problem with this is firefighters had been pulled out by 11:30a.m., six hours before the building collapsed at 5:20. The New York Times reported:
" Falling debris also caused major structural damage to the building, which soon began burning on multiple floors, said Francis X. Gribbon, a spokesman for the Fire Department. By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from it for safety reasons."
This is corroborated by the FEMA report on WTC7 which indicates that firefighting was not attempted in WTC7:
"due to lack of water, no manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY."
I can hear it now.
Prosecutor: Mr. Silverstein, it is clear you knew WTC7 was wired for demolition. It is on-camera on national TV. You said they decided to "pull it." How did you know at that time that the building was wired? Who wired it?
Larry: I meant pull out the firefighters.
Prosecutor: But Mr. Silverstein, you know the firefighters had all been pulled out many hours before the building collapsed. You also said, after saying "so we pulled it," the words "and we watched the building collapse." So it is obvious you were referring to a demolition.
Larry: I wish to invoke my 5th Amendment.
Prosecutor: Very well you have that right. Your honor, I request you direct the bailiff to place Mr. Silverstein under arrest as a suspect in the crime of 9/11. Mr. Silverstein, you may want to reconsider. If you are more forthcoming we may be able to arrange a plea bargain.
Larry: If I do that I'm as good as dead.
Prosecutor: Think about it, Larry.
Any honest prosecutor must acknowledge that Silverstein:
- admitted to foreknowledge of the crime.
- as owner of the WTC was in a position to provide access to the entire complex
- actually profited immensely from the attacks, through a court decision doubling his insurance payment by counting the attack as two events, one for each tower hit.
Silverstein took the insurance out just six weeks before 9/11.
We also know that Silverstein was not at breakfast on 9/11 at his usual table at the Windows on the World restaurant in WTC1. Silverstein told Charlie Rose that he had breakfast meetings there "every morning" since July 26th of that year. Remarkably, Silverstein's son and daughter, who worked for him on the 88th floor of the North Tower, were also not in their usual places. The New York Observer reports that they were "running late" that day. (Another who escaped death due to a last minute change is Bush cousin Jim Pearce.)
Therefore any honest prosecutor must view Silverstein with heightened interest if not outright suspicion. Silverstein blocked his own out by linking "pull it" to WTC7's "collapse." There is no satisfactory explanation for this admission to foreknowledge, caught on tape. If he does not answer how he got that foreknowledge he can be held in contempt. If he pleads the Fifth that's as good as a confession to some juries, especially with his monetary gain, and can be found guilty without testifying against himself.
Checkmate.
Additionally there is the remarkable material witness testimony of Fox News reporter Jeffrey Shapiro, who in an article criticizing "conspiracy theories" nevertheless reveals:
"Shortly before the building collapsed, several NYPD officers and Con-Edison workers told me that Larry Silverstein, the property developer of One World Financial Center was on the phone with his insurance carrier to see if they would authorize the controlled demolition of the building – since its foundation was already unstable and expected to fall."
Shapiro seems not to understand that office towers do not come pre-wired, nor that such work requires weeks if not months of planning and preparation.
2014 is the Year of Truth. You don't start at the top. You start at the bottom. Bottom-feeder Silverstein knows something. The billions he profited are small potatoes compared to the agenda of the big boys. 2014 is the year of getting beyond the "what" that is the shills' preferred battleground, because they simply repeat the silly index card points about the towers, for example, being like "hollow tubes."
Whoever allowed Silverstein on-camera to shoot-off his mouth made a grievous error. One problem with the criminally insane is you never know what they are going to say. There is no moral compass, so what is shocking to us, sounds fine to them.
We're moving the debate to the who and why. The trick to that is getting the bag men talking. On March 1, 1967, New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison arrested and charged New Orleans businessman Clay Shaw with conspiring to assassinate President Kennedy, reflecting the fact that law enforcement in America is not monolithic, but consists of thousands of elected fiefdoms.
Because the effects of 9/11 were felt across the country, sending young men to war in almost every county, jurisdiction can be asserted by almost any DA. Garrison's case against Shaw was far flimsier and more circumstantial than the direct evidence against Silverstein.
The case is momentous. If Silverstein is the key to the higher ups, then WTC7 is the key to 9/11. Because if one building was wired, they were all wired.
Look up you local DA
[youtube]-jPzAakHPpk[/youtube]
Last edited:
