-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Is Unguided Evolution Scientific?
- Thread starter rush1169
- Start date
- Status
Evidence for what?
You act as if forensic evidence is never used to support the claim that someone is guilty. This couldn't be farther from the truth.
Upvote
0
D
DerelictJunction
Guest
Then, you consider neither one to be evidence since evidence cannot be used to support a hypothesis (John killed his wife), only falsify that hypothesis.
If eyewitness testimony is not evidence, then what is it?
Maybe it is evidence and is being used to falsify a different hypothesis (John didn't kill his wife)? Similarly, the video footage, fingerprints, blood trail and clothing can be used to falsify that same hypothesis.
Extrapolating upon this, I conclude that the ERV evidence presented by Loudmouth falsifies the following two hypotheses:
1. Literal Genesis creationism.
2. Life did not evolve from a common ancestor.
Upvote
0
This thread was split automatically after 1000 replies and this thread has been automatically closed.
The new thread automatically created is here: "Is Unguided Evolution Scientific? (2)"
The new thread automatically created is here: "Is Unguided Evolution Scientific? (2)"
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
