• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Is truth relavtive?

Is truth relative?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Spherical Time

Reality has a well known Liberal bias.
Apr 20, 2005
2,375
227
44
New York City
Visit site
✟33,773.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
HouseApe said:
Did you want to provide a working definition of truth for the thread?
Well, since I think that any definition of truth is subjective, yes, I think that truth is relative.
 
Upvote 0

Spinrad

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2005
4,021
245
59
✟35,370.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
Truth is just a term used to describe someone's percieved accuracy about a given circumstance. All terms are somewhat relative, I think. If the word truth is to be used to describe some transcendental accuracy that is independant of the observer, then it could be said to be non-relative. But when a person uses it to describe some aspect of reality they percieve it is relative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hydra009
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
59
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟134,256.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Code-Monkey said:
Truth is not relative. Perspectives can be relative, but the fact that people have those perspectives is either true or not true.

Agreed.
 
Upvote 0

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟34,690.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Spinrad said:
I wouldn't call that "truth" anyway. I would say that according to what we know - or how we define 2 and 4 that mathematical phrase is accurate. I would call it truth to say I cannot concieve of a way that the mathematical phrase above would be innaccurate.
that's why I specified the logic behind it and not necessarily the equation.
I think mathmatical axioms fit the bill for truths that aren't relative.
In my opinion to doubt this is to enter into an espistemological discussion that borders on nihilism.
 
Upvote 0

Spinrad

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2005
4,021
245
59
✟35,370.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
US-Others
That's OK by me. Truth is a vague and easily misused term. I don't like it very much. Any time I hear the word truth used as a qualifier I automatically suspect the statement it is being used to qualify. Yes, even mathematically. I think that's why math is rarely qualified. It stands on it's own. I haven't ever heard anyone say 1+1 is truly 2, I guess is what I mean. No one really needs to question it. But when someone says that they saw something happen and or believe someothing happened and then try to demand that this is truth apart from their perceptions, they are full of it. They might be accurate in their statements, but they have no ability to judge them as true for anyone other than themselves.
 
Upvote 0

tcampen

Veteran
Jul 14, 2003
2,704
151
✟33,632.00
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Spinrad said:
Truth is just a term used to describe someone's percieved accuracy about a given circumstance. All terms are somewhat relative, I think. If the word truth is to be used to describe some transcendental accuracy that is independant of the observer, then it could be said to be non-relative. But when a person uses it to describe some aspect of reality they percieve it is relative.

That's the best darn answer anyone could hope for. Well Done!

:clap:
 
Upvote 0

Lonnie

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2003
601
10
US
✟32,704.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
A reason why I think that truth is not relative, is because logicaly it is impossible for two contradicting truths to exist.

Example:
There is no God.
There is a God.
Could both these statements be true? Logicaly, no. If so, then prove it logicaly.

I think that too often people use truth, as they would belief.
 
Upvote 0
C

Code-Monkey

Guest
Anyone who tries to claim that truth must absolutely be relative is being illogical. Someone can claim that it might be relative, but they can't claim that it definitely is relative. As soon as they have done that, then they are defeating themselves with their own logic. Their own claim doesn't agree with itself.

If truth truly were relative, then that would be itself an absolute truth. Thus, some truth must exist in the absolute realm.
 
Upvote 0
Dec 23, 2003
8
1
✟133.00
Faith
Atheist
I am personally of the opinion that truth does not exist, and is merely a human construct. Although mathematics is as well, it has proven applicable to the external world by all those who understand the rules of the idea, (1+1=2) while religious, social, and philosophical "truths" are ever changeing. In this sense, I view science as dealing with the concrete (in that it generally accurately describes the world of the observers) and reproducable, while "truth," despite its deffinition, exists as influenced by the believer.

Having never percieved any evidence for absolute truths, I shall abstain from believing them to exist.
 
Upvote 0

Lonnie

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2003
601
10
US
✟32,704.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Can the following contradicting statements be true?

1) There is no God. There is a God.

2) I have never eaten, and never will. I am always eating, and always will.

3) Truth is relative. Truth is not relative.

4) You believe truth is relative. You believe that truth is not relative.

5) You are exactly 6 feet tall. You are exactly 5 feet tall.
 
Upvote 0

David Gould

Pearl Harbor sucked. WinAce didn't.
May 28, 2002
16,931
514
55
Canberra, Australia
Visit site
✟44,118.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
AU-Labor
I think Spinrad has it perfectly correct in this thread. The big problem is the definition of 'truth'.

My position is that there is a way the universe really operates. However, there is no way of ever telling if we have worked out what that way actually is.
 
Upvote 0
C

Code-Monkey

Guest
David Gould said:
I think Spinrad has it perfectly correct in this thread. The big problem is the definition of 'truth'.

My position is that there is a way the universe really operates. However, there is no way of ever telling if we have worked out what that way actually is.

Regardless of whether or not we can actually figure out the world (as if we were omniscient somehow), I think we can agree that it is in fact true that we believe it's a difficult task to understand the world. It's true that your username is David Gould, and mine Code-Monkey. These are absolute truths. So we can agree that at least some exist.
 
Upvote 0