Is this rule being adhered to in this sub-forum?

[Protoevangel]

Actually, quite easy.

When someone repeatedly makes statements and claims that are not at all in line with Lutheran teaching and understanding, it is a pretty clear indication that they don't understand Lutheran theology. The determination comes from their own words.

This is a true statement.

Do you think there is a way we could address this in the main forum? What about one who continues to claim that he/she is representing Lutheran belief, but continues to promote the most un-Lutheran of doctrine?

I am not conccerned about a non-Lutheran coming in to debate, but one who falsly claims to be a Lutheran, and refuses to accept any kind of correction. Is there any way we can deal with this?

 

[Jim47]

Dan, I think I understand why you are saying this, and yes it could technically be done, BUT, do we want to do it? The reason I say this is if we don't allow debate between Lutherans with different beliefs, how will that serve God and how will it bennefit the church that Jesus died for? For if we prohibit debate and discussion just because they aren't in line with the confessions, at that point we have shut ourselves off from witnessing to them. This may relieve stress for a few, but in my eyes it will also defeat the very purpose of having discussion.

 

[DaRev]

Dan, I think I understand why you are saying this, and yes it could technically be done, BUT, do we want to do it? The reason I say this is if we don't allow debate between Lutherans with different beliefs, how will that serve God and how will it bennefit the church that Jesus died for? For if we prohibit debate and discussion just because they aren't in line with the confessions, at that point we have shut ourselves off from witnessing to them. This may relieve stress for a few, but in my eyes it will also defeat the very purpose of having discussion.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that precsiely what the main forum is for?

Wasn't the subforum created for friendly discussion among like-minded Lutherans?

If such is not the case, then I move that the subforums be deleted altogether. They are useless.

 

[SPALATIN]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that precsiely what the main forum is for?

Wasn't the subforum created for friendly discussion among like-minded Lutherans?

If such is not the case, then I move that the subforums be deleted altogether. They are useless.

Jim,

I have to agree with DaRev. The subforums were so that we could have like-minded discussions with each other. The main forum is where debate should take place.

 

[C.F.W. Walther]

I think there's some wires crossed. It looks like Jim is addressing a statement that looks like Dan wants to be discussed in the main forum when I really think he wants the change in the sub forum. and Jim is addressing the statement like it was meant for the main forum or.........???

 

[Jim47]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that precsiely what the main forum is for?

Wasn't the subforum created for friendly discussion among like-minded Lutherans?

If such is not the case, then I move that the subforums be deleted altogether. They are useless.

I agree, but Dan's question was on the main forum.

Dan

Do you think there is a way we could address this in the main forum? What about one who continues to claim that he/she is representing Lutheran belief, but continues to promote the most un-Lutheran of doctrine?

I am not conccerned about a non-Lutheran coming in to debate, but one who falsly claims to be a Lutheran, and refuses to accept any kind of correction. Is there any way we can deal with this?

 

[Protoevangel]

My question was abut the main forum only.

My question was not about debate about differences in the Lutheran Synods.

My question was not about debate from non-Lutheran denominations.

My question only referred to false bretheren...

People who:
1. Call themselves Lutheran
2. Continue to promote non-Lutheran Doctrine
3. Continue to refuse correction.

 

[Jim47]

My question was abut the main forum only.

My question was not about debate about differences in the Lutheran Synods.

My question was not about debate from non-Lutheran denominations.

My question only referred to false bretheren...

People who:
1. Call themselves Lutheran
2. Continue to promote non-Lutheran Doctrine
3. Continue to refuse correction.

I understood all of that Dan. I know its frustrating. What would you like me to do?

This is a bigger decision then I can make, and I think before we take it to a staff level we should poll all the members here, but not the usual poll. One where they have to respond with posts and give their reasons.

You are welcome to PM me. Or anyone for that matter.

 

[Protoevangel]

Ah, I guess I'm just blowing steam.

Even if we did decide to discuss it in earnest, I suppose I shouldn't hijack this thread, it should be discussed in the main forum, since that is where it would affect.

 

[LutherNut]

Ah, I guess I'm just blowing steam.

Even if we did decide to discuss it in earnest, I suppose I shouldn't hijack this thread, it should be discussed in the main forum, since that is where it would affect.

There is always the option of starting a subscription forum on another Groups server, like MSN or one of those. It's not like we are all locked up here in CF.


...just a thought.

 

[DaRev]

There is always the option of starting a subscription forum on another Groups server, like MSN or one of those. It's not like we are all locked up here in CF.


...just a thought.

There is already a "Missouri Synod Lutherans" group on MSN Groups, but it's an open forum. There are some who come in to stir up the pot from time to time, but the regulars there (including some pastors) do a good job of keeping order.
It's not as active as it once was, but there are still some good discussions that arise from time to time. Most of the trouble makers have been weeded out.

It might be worth checking out.

There is also a LCMS/WELS oriented group called "White Rose Ministries" but there is a lot more debate that goes on there.

And there is a LCMS oriented forum at lcms.suddenlaunch.com, although this one is rarely active. It could be "re-invigorated" if need be.

 

[C.F.W. Walther]

Well LQ is available but they are somewhat irratic and argumentative allthough very active

 

[Protoevangel]

I have been enjoying LQ lately, although I still lurk a lot more than I participate there.

 

[ByzantineDixie]

I have been enjoying LQ lately, although I still lurk a lot more than I participate there.

Enjoying LQ??? I hardly know what to make of that!

 

[DaRev]

Friends don't let friends read LQ!

 

[C.F.W. Walther]

Friends don't let friends read LQ!

Why?------because it's Cascione's site or because it's argumentative?

Actually I like their more lenient rules but it brings in some unusual people. Would be informative to have the Prues's over here. Might just go invite them.

 

[LilLamb219]

I have been reading LQ daily for more than 3 years and really have learned a lot. I rarely post on there though.

 

[Protoevangel]

Yea, I've had a pretty good reception there the two or three posts I have made there.

I would really like to see the Prues's post here on occasion!