Same as us.Actually, he has provided evidence. The evidence, such as it is, consists of the opinions of men born centuries after the fact who were evidently influenced by the secular culture of their time.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Same as us.Actually, he has provided evidence. The evidence, such as it is, consists of the opinions of men born centuries after the fact who were evidently influenced by the secular culture of their time.
That has been explained already.Then, why did she ask?
I believe that the Moravian Church is now in full fellowship with the ELCA/ELCIC and their affiliates, what is left of their congregations, if they are using new hymnals, it would likely be the ELCA book.
And that 'early church' started getting wobbly during that time, even as some were spreading corruption while the apostles were alive.
Why, YES IT DOES! I posted the verses above! And there's not one quark of Scripture saying Joe had been married before, by the slightest implication!
The WOG says they were His bros. & that He had sisters as well. THAT'S what counts. There's NOTHING in the WOG suggesting Mary was a perpetual virgin. That's a RCC invention.You have provided no Scriptural evidence to support your opinion, you have conjectured that although some form of the word "brother' in the Bible in example after example refers to cousin or kinsmen that somehow, in the example you cite, it must prove that Mary had other children. Do not try and add your personal belief to the Word of God.
Semper Virago is the norm; your position is a recent innovation attributable only to the most radical of the radical reformers. It is also irreverent and disrespectful of the Mother of God.The WOG says they were His bros. & that He had sisters as well. THAT'S what counts. There's NOTHING in the WOG suggesting Mary was a perpetual virgin. That's a RCC invention.
Semper Virago is the norm; your position is a recent innovation attributable only to the most radical of the radical reformers. It is also irreverent and disrespectful of the Mother of God.
That happens when I hate it...Something like that!(LOL)...
This post was made accidentally.
There is plenty support in Scripture for Mary being only the mother of Jesus. It is not a RCC invention. It was the understanding passed down in the Church long before the papacy became established in Rome as it now exists in the Catholic Church.There's NOTHING in the WOG suggesting Mary was a perpetual virgin. That's a RCC invention.
Which is not what I said.I think that we all agree that Mary was the only mother of Jesus Christ.
Which is not what I said.
You might as well have stated that wood comes from trees.Quite true. I did not quote you as saying that, did I? I merely stated a belief which all Christians hold. I assume you believe that, as well.
I think that we all agree that Mary was the only mother of Jesus Christ.
This, Theotokos, a Virgin Birth (virginity ante-partum and in-partu), and salvation, her being worthy of imitation in some degree, and probably something else I am missing are the bare minimums all believe concerning her. This is true.