Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Engineered ignorance to accommodate creationism is a blight on the US and should be seen as a form of child abuse.
I've heard of the same rants from the scientific community when Andreas Vesalius tried to publish a book to correct to misconceptions of Galen's medical teachings which were mostly incorrect about the human body. Yet were taught from for years as fact during the 1400-1500's in major universities.
I am not trivializing it but child abuse comes in many forms both physical and mental and deliberately retarding a child's mind in order for it to believe in a myth can well be considered child abuse.
Who made these rants?
Unfortunately yes you do, you tell a child about Santa Claus but you must indoctrinate a child about Gods.
Then as the child get's older you stop telling them about Santa but you keep indoctrinating them about Gods.
It's fear that keep children believing in Gods, the fear of punishment for something they didn't do.
Only in religious circles would scaring a child half to death be considered to be good for them, religion is a sickness.
If that is natural then we can certainly be unnatural. We can break rules and we can be immoral.
Engineered ignorance to accommodate creationism is a blight on the US and should be seen as a form of child abuse.
One of the first things impressed upon the students in the animal behavior class I took, was that we should not project human motives on non-human animals.Often the morals we claim animals have are our interpretation of an animal's behavior. (This would included rape., murder, etc.)
Unfortunately yes you do, you tell a child about Santa Claus but you must indoctrinate a child about Gods.
Then as the child get's older you stop telling them about Santa but you keep indoctrinating them about Gods.
It's fear that keep children believing in Gods, the fear of punishment for something they didn't do.
Only in religious circles would scaring a child half to death be considered to be good for them, religion is a sickness.
You have no answer so you bring on the mumbo jumbo and try to deflect and you must know exactly what no shame is.
What I said is true and you can not deny it.
Engineered ignorance to accommodate creationism is a blight on the US and should be seen as a form of child abuse.
Apparently not. I really have not a lot of patience with militant anti theists nor militant theists. Both do much more damage than good in my opinion.Back with yet another sock-puppet, consol? Have you no shame?
Exactly the opposite, I am a thinking fully functioning human being which is more than I can say for you people,
without your imaginary friends you would be unable to function properly, if at all.
Careful, don't be flaming.
You are not going to cheat fate or reality just by telling yourself to believe something someone told you, growing up and facing and living life full on is the only hope any of us have, I'm doing it why aren't you?
You can place your hope in yourself and your fellow man if you want to, we place ours in God and Jesus Christ.
How can the truth be flaming?
Like the Muslims do with Allah? or have they got it all wrong?
Its no "mumbo jumbo" to point out that your multiple accounts here are not only against forum rules, but also an unethical means of getting around forum bans.You have no answer so you bring on the mumbo jumbo and try to deflect and you must know exactly what no shame is.
I can deny it. You are belittling child abuse, by comparing it to teaching creationism. I agree that creationism is something of a blight, but it is not child abuse for people to teach their children what they believe is true. Not to mention the fact that your behavior here is counter-productive (as always) in keeping people from teaching their children creationism.What I said is true and you can not deny it.
Engineered ignorance to accommodate creationism is a blight on the US and should be seen as a form of child abuse.
Its no "mumbo jumbo" to point out that your multiple accounts here are not only against forum rules, but also an unethical means of getting around forum bans.
I can deny it. You are belittling child abuse, by comparing it to teaching creationism. I agree that creationism is something of a blight, but it is not child abuse for people to teach their children what they believe is true. Not to mention the fact that your behavior here is counter-productive (as always) in keeping people from teaching their children creationism.
They can be as nasty and as unkind as they like but not us, why is that, is it because they are damaged and so in need that we must make allowances for them?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?