Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If God can't do all things, then he's not omnipotent. Ipso facto.
It would be against God's nature to even entertain such a meaningless question.
You've made your personal decision, you deny the existence of God. Somehow you still have to discuss and attack this being in which you're positive doesn't exist though.
Carry on. You're just one of the many controlled by the antichrist spirit (per scripture) which have made the same mistake for quite a long time now.
Why does people try to play word games as if God is that satellite in the original Star Trek where Kirk convince it was not perfect.Meaningless babble. Is God omnipotent or not?
Meaningless babble. Is God omnipotent or not?
Why does people try to play word games as if God is that satellite in the original Star Trek where Kirk convince it was not perfect.
God is omnipotent except when it comes to contradicting the meaning of omnipotent.
God is omnipotent except when it comes to contradicting the meaning of omnipotent.
Your question is meaningless babble. Go play somewhere else.
Fine where I am, thanks.
Is God omnipotent or not?
Also, thinking more on this, why is free will good, from God's standpoint? If free will is what makes sin exist in the first place, and God abhors sin, why does he endow beings with free will at all?
Does God exist or not? If not, you're wanting to discuss a non-existent being with non-existent attributes.
Irrelevant.
Sure it's relevant, very relevant. You're wishing to discuss a non-existent (in your view) being. A wisp of nothingness.
I never said God didn't exist. But even if I did, people discuss fictional beings all the time. It's quite common. Disbelieving the existence of a being does not mean that I'm barred from discussing the attributes such a being would have if it existed.
Maybe, maybe not. Doesn't change my question.
We have to first determine what non-existent being you believe in.
Like I said... bad plan.
Why then did he throw him down to earth and the garden, where he could wreck havoc on mankind for thousands of years???
A simple rule which God already knew before hand they would disobey.
Really? Thousands of years to let the "perfect" creation sit in satan's hands???? That's God's plan????
Maybe I am just wiser than the writers of GEN? Or more likely, maybe I am just wiser than you. You, who is misinterpreting GEN.
We don't have to do that at all. I don't need to believe a being exists or not in order to discuss the properties typically assigned to said being. I don't have to believe Huckleberry Finn was a real person in order to write an essay on Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. I don't have to believe animals can talk in order to discuss Animal Farm.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?