Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Is There a 'Middle Ground' Author?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rush1169" data-source="post: 60751380" data-attributes="member: 309746"><p>To clarify my less than detailed enough problem description: Person "B" can answer 'yes', 'no', or 'maybe' because he/she holds an evolutionary worldview, therefore is NOT the middle ground. Just as person 'A', the creationist, is not a middle ground. The only reason "B" can answer 'maybe' is not meant to imply that 'maybe' is a middle ground on the question, rather the creature in question doesn't reveal <em>enough</em> for evolutionist "B" to make a firm declaration either way. Both person "A" and "B" hold opposing worldviews. I'd like to see a person "C" who doesn't adhere to either worldview filter the argument of person "B" to just the facts of the fossil and then talk about in what ways <em>just the facts</em> of the fossil may support it's transitional status or how the facts may not support it's transitional status. Hopefully that helps you understand what (and why) I'm looking for person "C" - and that person "C" need not be specific to transitionals, but <em>any </em>point of argument between the two sides. . .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rush1169, post: 60751380, member: 309746"] To clarify my less than detailed enough problem description: Person "B" can answer 'yes', 'no', or 'maybe' because he/she holds an evolutionary worldview, therefore is NOT the middle ground. Just as person 'A', the creationist, is not a middle ground. The only reason "B" can answer 'maybe' is not meant to imply that 'maybe' is a middle ground on the question, rather the creature in question doesn't reveal [I]enough[/I] for evolutionist "B" to make a firm declaration either way. Both person "A" and "B" hold opposing worldviews. I'd like to see a person "C" who doesn't adhere to either worldview filter the argument of person "B" to just the facts of the fossil and then talk about in what ways [I]just the facts[/I] of the fossil may support it's transitional status or how the facts may not support it's transitional status. Hopefully that helps you understand what (and why) I'm looking for person "C" - and that person "C" need not be specific to transitionals, but [I]any [/I]point of argument between the two sides. . . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Is There a 'Middle Ground' Author?
Top
Bottom