In my search for the 'truth' between creation and evolution, I've come to realize that there are very few (any?) resources that the writer/speaker is not already comitted one way or another. As such, whatever it is that is being researched seems to have a foregone conclusion depending on the author's comittment. If you know the author's committment in advance, you already know what you are about to read and if you don't know in advance, you'll know by the time you finish reading.
It's rare (ever?) for a writer to, regardless of their comittment, say, "Yeah, this simply does not fit (creation/evolution) because. . .(the reason will greatly weaken or destroy my case)" without at least qualifing the reason to eliminate the weakening or destruction.
My inquisition becomes maddening and frustrating. I think it's even more frustrating than talking about political 'hot topics' with the opposition
It would be so refreshing to talk/read about <insert any creation/evolution facet here> with people who can honestly see, consider, and discuss both 'sides' of the issue. With that, does anyone know of a book or other resource in which the author firmly stands in the middle and discusses both sides of the issue? Is there anyone here that can discuss both sides?
It's rare (ever?) for a writer to, regardless of their comittment, say, "Yeah, this simply does not fit (creation/evolution) because. . .(the reason will greatly weaken or destroy my case)" without at least qualifing the reason to eliminate the weakening or destruction.
My inquisition becomes maddening and frustrating. I think it's even more frustrating than talking about political 'hot topics' with the opposition
It would be so refreshing to talk/read about <insert any creation/evolution facet here> with people who can honestly see, consider, and discuss both 'sides' of the issue. With that, does anyone know of a book or other resource in which the author firmly stands in the middle and discusses both sides of the issue? Is there anyone here that can discuss both sides?