Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Is There a 'Middle Ground' Author?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rush1169" data-source="post: 60751299" data-attributes="member: 309746"><p>I've exhausted myself with internet arguing between creationism and evolutionism (not in this thread or forum). I've never come across anyone who doesn't resort to hyperbole and rhetoric from BOTH sides of the argument. It always results ridiculous discussions in semantics, wordiness, and assumptions presented as fact. So much so that inordinate amounts of time and typing is required to keep both parties focused and to filter out the false statements that are presented as fact. It's a tiresome process that never results in any coherent agreement or conclusion or presentation. Just look at the crazy long topics in this forum that are a continuous recycling of talking points.</p><p> </p><p>@Loudmouth: While I appreciate your worldview explanation of how the scientific method applies to transitional fossils, you've really just provided an example as to why I'm looking for a science professional who can take a non-worldview based, soley factual approach to examining the presentations of both worldviews applicable to, in this case, a specific transitional fossil. More generally, one who takes a non-worldview stance on many of the talking points found in any evolutionist/creationist 'debate'.</p><p> </p><p>Maybe there are no well researched analysis made from a standpoint that objectively examines both worldviews. . .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rush1169, post: 60751299, member: 309746"] I've exhausted myself with internet arguing between creationism and evolutionism (not in this thread or forum). I've never come across anyone who doesn't resort to hyperbole and rhetoric from BOTH sides of the argument. It always results ridiculous discussions in semantics, wordiness, and assumptions presented as fact. So much so that inordinate amounts of time and typing is required to keep both parties focused and to filter out the false statements that are presented as fact. It's a tiresome process that never results in any coherent agreement or conclusion or presentation. Just look at the crazy long topics in this forum that are a continuous recycling of talking points. @Loudmouth: While I appreciate your worldview explanation of how the scientific method applies to transitional fossils, you've really just provided an example as to why I'm looking for a science professional who can take a non-worldview based, soley factual approach to examining the presentations of both worldviews applicable to, in this case, a specific transitional fossil. More generally, one who takes a non-worldview stance on many of the talking points found in any evolutionist/creationist 'debate'. Maybe there are no well researched analysis made from a standpoint that objectively examines both worldviews. . . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Is There a 'Middle Ground' Author?
Top
Bottom