Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Amen! But we choose to ignore our own. It's going to another 9/11 or a severe economic event to get people to be like-minded for a week.Both parties are corrupt ...
I consider violations of U.S. law a bad thing. Joe is supposed to be acting within the law, he took an oath to God to uphold the Constitution and thus the laws of the land. Using taxpayer money for political purposes, or federal employees violating the Hatch Act, is prohibited.And this is a bad thing because..?
If Biden says that inflation was 9% when he took office, that was easily shown to be 'misinformation'. When Trump said 'In February alone, nearly 1 million jobs held by native-born Americans disappeared' the same applies.
How difficult do you see this being? Why can't an honest bi-partisan group fulfill that need?
Amen! But we choose to ignore our own. It's going to another 9/11 or a severe economic event to get people to be like-minded for a week.
It appears that that hard left-wing groups are involved, with people that advocate voting for illegals. An encouragement to vote by the government should be strictly non-partisan.Who are these "approved outside groups"?
What are the alleged "sweeping election policy changes"?
Could they possibly involve registering more citizens to vote? I suppose that activity is now viewed as "election interference". SMH
That sounds like a very good plan, something along those lines. But be aware that more and more non-citizens are receiving social security numbers from the Biden administration. There is great concern because the Biden administration is already violating the immigration laws and the order by the Supreme Court on student loans, so what's to stop from them just ignoring non-citizens voting? I would add pre-registration where an individual needs to do more than just sign a statement claiming they are a citizen. I don't want millions of unregistered non-citizens showing up to vote on election day, claiming they are citizens.I am 100% for voter registration and even voting by mail with two caveats:
1. Registration and ballots must be requested by the voter and mailed to their residence -
2. Registration and voting must include the voters Social Security Number (last 4 is OK) and signature.
Since they are already attesting to their citizenship and all citizens have Social Security numbers - it would be a no brainer and number could be checked against socials that are associated with non citizens.
Both sides would be satisfied.
Encouraging voting is not a political purpose.I consider violations of U.S. law a bad thing. Joe is supposed to be acting within the law, he took an oath to God to uphold the Constitution and thus the laws of the land. Using taxpayer money for political purposes, or federal employees violating the Hatch Act, is prohibited.
I already sign the book every time I vote.I am 100% for voter registration and even voting by mail with two caveats:
1. Registration and ballots must be requested by the voter and mailed to their residence -
2. Registration and voting must include the voters Social Security Number (last 4 is OK) and signature.
Since they are already attesting to their citizenship and all citizens have Social Security numbers - it would be a no brainer and number could be checked against socials that are associated with non citizens.
Both sides would be satisfied.
Using government money to encourage voter registration and participation is not political or illegal.Correct. Using government money for political purposes is the part that is illegal.
It appears that that hard left-wing groups are involved, with people that advocate voting for illegals. An encouragement to vote by the government should be strictly non-partisan.
Increasing the number of citizens that vote is not against the constitution. If you have some details of anything illegal that the current administration is doing or wants to do then can you please present it?I consider violations of U.S. law a bad thing. Joe is supposed to be acting within the law, he took an oath to God to uphold the Constitution and thus the laws of the land. Using taxpayer money for political purposes, or federal employees violating the Hatch Act, is prohibited.
But they gave no examples of who was likely doing it and what they were doing. Some details would be instructive. In fact, nothing can be said for or against this until we have some.They could.
The allegations are that this isn't being done by fair minded non partisans. If it was I'm sure there wouldn't be the concern here, as they said this is being done by far left activists not fairminded individuals as being why it's mentioned as concerning.
Not just political purposes, but partisan political purposes.Correct. Using government money for political purposes is the part that is illegal.
I know that in Washington D.C. it is legal for illegals to vote for mayor and city council members. And how many illegals will be voting for president despite the laws against it we do not know.Well that's idiotic.
Illegal or undocumented immigrants can't vote. It isn't a voting demographic and never has been.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?