Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't care if SHEOUL means PEPTO BISMOL.
I'm not the one who sat in the seat of a King James translator and wrote the word HELL.
The King James Bible says it, that settles it.
Lazarus ... simple question I ask of all non-KJVOs:
What is God the Father's name?
Will you tell me that, please?
Not exactly ... but I do believe that God superintended the work of the KJB.You must, then, believe that the KJV translators with their single-denomination outlook, were more inspired than Moses and all the rest of the Biblical writers.
No.Lazarus Short said:If you believe in the Anglican KJV so strongly, should you not convert to the Anglican church, or at least to the Episcopal?
Its a reference to the deity of Christ.OK, but first tell me why the KJV hides the name of the Father behind "LORD."
OK, we are in agreement there, but I got clued in by the "YHVH" as in my avatar, which the KJV hides. You still have not admitted why the KJV translators hid the fact of the pre-incarnate Christ being the God of the OT by using "LORD." It seems to me that they gave us only an obscure hint.JESUS of the New Testament is the LORD of the Old Testament.
If the King James translators wrote HELL over the word SHEOUL, then more power to them.
The King James Bible says it, that settles it.
Lazarus ... simple question I ask of all non-KJVOs:
What is God the Father's name?
Will you tell me that, please?
The doctrine of the inerrancy of Scripture is foundational to evangelical faith...
Or is it????!!
In the same way that the human authors of the scriptures knew.Thanks for you response. I just wondered how someone could know about what Jesus had done to save them without hearing the scriptures, the message, that relates to salvation.
Wow, thank you @sparow . I now consider my mind officially blown!I think this is a wrong question; the correct question should be "is the belief that the Bible is inerrant, a form of idolatry"? The only people who would need a inerrant Bible would be a legalist; the Bible or scripture is a living entity and editing's and extras do not have life; from scripture is an endless stream of understanding and wisdom; if one understood first go the endless stream would not be present. Seriously, what better place for Satan to attack than to interfere with the scriptures; changing Laws and times.
OK, but the Faith is called "Christ-ianity", not "Bible-ianity". So why do you worship the Book rather than the Man? Isn't worshipping the book a form of idolatry? Or is it a mystical-magical inerrant book?I do not know about evangelical faith, but it is foundational for TRUE Christianity. There are some who like to call themselves Christian but are far from being Christian. Either the Bible is God's Word and is without error or it is not God's Word and is in error. God is Perfect and without error, his Word must also be without error or it is not from him. There are false teachers and false Christians ( who are really not Christian ) who embrace an idea of God but not the true nature of God, and therefore are diluted in their thinking and except falsehood.( Romans 1:18-32 ) These people have no fellowship with the one true God, and his people the Church. John 1:1-5 states that Jesus Christ is the Word made flesh and blood. Jesus Christ is without error and so is the Word that he became one with.
Now I'm not talking about the English Bibles that we have, but the Original Word in the Original language of Hebrew and Greek, of which we have over 5000 copies. More than any other ancient document of History. The Original Word has been well Preserved.
Where does scripture indicate (in every instance) that the original words were lead by the holy Spirit?Scripture nowhere indicating those who would later translate the Bible into different languages were lead by the Holy Spirit.
I'm not saying that God's Word is in error, I'm saying that the Bible has errors.Well you would be wrong. God does not like to be called a Liar, and that is what your doing when you say his Word is in error.
Where does scripture indicate (in every instance) that the original words were lead by the holy Spirit?
Not all Christians worship the Bible. Some Christians just worship Christ. (That's what the word "Christian" means.)
They were there.In the same way that the human authors of the scriptures knew.
When those words were written, the New Testament cannon didn't exist. So this only refers to the Tanakh.2 peter 1:20-21
2 timothy 3:16-17
A perfect answer!They were there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?