Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I assume that you have Serafini's book, so if it's not asking too much, could you please provide me with the link. Surely that wouldn't violate the copyright.But it turns out it actually it did. Serafini read it at the sanctuary and says don’t waste your time, it adds nothing : but it is linked from his book.
I assume that you have Serafini's book, so if it's not asking too much, could you please provide me with the link. Surely that wouldn't violate the copyright.
Perhaps I wasn't clear, I don't want a link to the book, I want the link to the WHO/UN report which you said was in the book.Be fair to me, I did!!
I mentioned it / linked it several times!
I got shouted down because it’s a book!!
Perhaps I wasn't clear, I don't want a link to the book, I want the link to the WHO/UN report which you said was in the book.
(I noticed that you changed your post from "linked" to "referenced")
So I'm still left questioning whether this report ever actually existed. And I'm assuming that the quote which everyone references isn't actually from the report, but rather it's from Serafini's reference to the alleged report. To be honest, I don't think that the report ever actually existed, and you have given me no reason to change my mind.
It's exactly because of things like this that I can't trust what you say, nor would I trust any of the books which you recommend so adamantly.
So after hours of searching I'm asking you for one thing, some evidence that this alleged WHO/UN report ever actually existed.
I'll try...thanks.But I dare say you could track down biondini.
So if I send you an Amazon voucher to the value of the kindle serafini will you read it? You say you have never read a book, I found that surprising.I'll try...thanks.
Just to clarify, I previously said that I had never bought a book, not that I had never read one. But you're close enough that your point is valid as far as I'm concerned. I'm not an avid reader, and no, I wouldn't read a book even if you gave me a voucher.So if I send you an Amazon voucher to the value of the kindle serafini will you read it? You say you have never read a book, I found surprising.
Just to clarify, I previously said that I had never bought a book, not that I had never read one. But you're close enough that your point is valid as far as I'm concerned. I'm not an avid reader, and no, I wouldn't read a book even if you gave me a voucher.
I"ll readily admit that I'm uneducated, unread, and relatively ignorant compared to many other posters here. But as my sister would say, "don't let him fool you, he's not stupid."
That being said however, I'm actually having problems coming up with much of anything concerning Prof. Giuseppe Biondini, other than a couple of Lanciano websites referencing him in regards to the WHO/UN report. But I'll keep trying. I have an internet connection and I know how to Google, so if he's out there I should be able to find him.
I think that you and I, although probably from the same generation have grown up in different worlds, you with your books and education, and me with my internet and little else. You're just gonna have to trust me, I'm doing the best that I can.
You didn’t . I did. I pointed out that even junk costs money
Why do you expect free? I seriously don’t get it.
You do love your assumptions, that alone disqualifies you as a scientist. I did indeed defend a thesis.
Because I'm trying to give these claims the due diligence that they require. Not jump around from one supposed miracle to another. I chose to begin at the beginning...Lanciano. I'm trying to ascertain whether the claims made are valid.Why bother with biondini? He didn’t do the pathology, and from serafinis opinion he made a hash of retelling it even
Why not read tixtla. Sokolka. Legnica. Buenos airies?
I notice - as a result of web limitations - you made up the idea that castarnon didn’t report.
Ummm, yeah. The p-value is not low enough yet to reject the null hypothesis on this one.
You seem to lack basic skills in discussing science topics. What was your thesis in? It clearly wasn't science.
I'm not joking here, Mike. I'm not saying this to be rude and offensive but you have shown ZERO facility with discussing science. Your posts are a mixture of appeals to authority, lists of how much you've paid for books and hand-waving coupled with pseudo-scientific gobbledygook.
Because I'm trying to give these claims the due diligence that they require. Not jump around from one supposed miracle to another.
As I, Opdrey, and many others would no doubt maintain, a book doesn't equate to a published report.
apriori p values
You seem more interested in me than the evidence! Does your hubris ever allow new information in?
Because I'm trying to give these claims the due diligence that they require. Not jump around from one supposed miracle to another. I chose to begin at the beginning...Lanciano. I'm trying to ascertain whether the claims made are valid.
The Eucharistic miracle of Buenos Aires, in fact, has only recently started to be known because the bishop of Buenos Aires at the time of the event was Jorge Bergoglio, who has become Pope a few years ago. The only one who disclosed the news was Dr. Castanon, who did it through interviews and conferences, but it seems he has not published any results yet.
Recent Eucharistic miracle in Argentina, Buenos Aires | Thresholds - Le Soglie
As I, Opdrey, and many others would no doubt maintain, a book doesn't equate to a published report.
.. and your self-claimed 'high IQ' is not a non sequitur there?As someone blessed ( or cursed ) with a high IQ I see through all his straw men and non sequiturs.
The tests themselves should have been designed for ruling out contamination (by controlling for those variables). They didn't. Therefore contamination remains possible (and plausible).Mountainmike said:He cannot blame comtamination with no credible suggestion of what contaminated them consistent with it.
As for @Opdrey I give up.
As someone blessed ( or cursed ) with a high IQ I see through all his straw men and non sequiturs.
Indeed in the pictures with zugibe you actually see tesoriero and willeseee.
I am not going to waste any more time explaining the detail to people who refuse to pay for books,
preferring any old blog, or like opdrey thinks his opinion counts more than pathologists!
In his case p value is spelled p-e-e ( load of)
The tests themselves should have been designed for ruling out contamination (by controlling for those variables). They didn't. Therefore contamination remains possible (and plausible).
.. and your self-claimed 'high IQ' is not a non sequitur there?
The tests themselves should have been designed for ruling out contamination (by controlling for those variables). They didn't. Therefore contamination remains possible (and plausible).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?